Table 3.
Correspondence between intensive care professionals’ intentions and improvement recommendations before and after receiving feedback
| Intentions corresponding with improvement recommendations | Absolute risk difference | Odds ratio* (95% CI) |
p value | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Before feedback | After feedback | ||||
| All quality indicators (n = 288) | 197 (68.4%) | 230 (79.9%) | 11.5% | 2.41 (1.53 to 3.78) | < 0.001 |
| Improvement recommendation | |||||
| Good performance (n = 71) | 19 (26.7%) | 31 (43.7%) | 17.0% | 3.88 (1.39 to 10.87) | 0.010 |
| Room for improvement and improvement recommended (n = 217) | 178 (82.0%) | 199 (91.7%) | 9.7% | 4.36 (1.94 to 9.79) | < 0.001 |
*Adjusted for clustering with random effects for each individual professional, ICU and quality indicator