Skip to main content
. 2018 Feb 16;8:3167. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-21548-x

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Actuarial analysis of complications after experimental constriction of the mid aortic arch with the RT and DLC techniques. (a) Comparison of mortality estimates shows a significant difference favouring the double loop technique and a concentration of early deaths in the Rockman group and relatively constant attrition rate in the DLC cohort. (b) Comparison of the probabilities of a low transcoarctational gradient not attributable to LV systolic dysfunction (gradient <30 mm Hg with LVEF>50%). (c) Estimates of percent probability of freedom from the combined end-point (death or low gradient) reflect a significant superiority of the double loop technique. (d) Actuarial survival, using the DLC technique, for animals operated of TAC and, TAC+de-TAC. Numbers over the X axis represent the animals at risk for each cohort at the corresponding time point. All comparisons with Gehan-Breslow-Wilcoxon test. TAC: Transverse aortic constriction; de-TAC: Release of TAC.