Table 6. Analysis of molecular variance (AMOVA) from microsatellite data within three species of octopus from Northwest México.
Species | Source of variation | Variance | df | Sum of squares | Means of squares | Estimated variance | P value |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Octopus | Among Populations (FST) | 19% | 2 | 28.808 | 14.404 | 0.610 | 0.000 |
extbfbimaculoides | Among Indiv (FIS) | 0% | 28 | 56.338 | 2.012 | 0.000 | 1.000 |
Within Indiv (FIT) | 81% | 31 | 80.000 | 2.581 | 2.581 | 0.005 | |
Total | 100% | 61 | 165.145 | 3.190 | |||
Octopus | Among Populations (FST) | 16% | 5 | 87.004 | 17.401 | 0.471 | 0.000 |
hubbsorum | Among Indiv (FIS) | 11% | 93 | 256.834 | 2.762 | 0.308 | 0.000 |
Within Indiv (FIT) | 73% | 99 | 212.500 | 2.146 | 2.146 | 0.000 | |
Total | 100% | 197 | 556.338 | 2.925 | |||
Octopus | Among Populations (FST) | 9% | 8 | 92.321 | 11.540 | 0.293 | 0.000 |
bimaculatus | Among Indiv (FIS) | 3% | 129 | 380.349 | 2.948 | 0.094 | 0.003 |
Within Indiv (FIT) | 88% | 138 | 381.000 | 2.761 | 2.761 | 0.000 | |
Total | 100% | 275 | 853.670 | 3.148 |