Skip to main content
. 2018 Jan 24;8(4):2182–2195. doi: 10.1002/ece3.3775

Table 1.

(a) Mitochondrial genetic diversity levels, mtDNA neutrality tests, and a summary of mismatch distributions for 486 bp of Lethrinus harak and Lethrinus mahsena COI mtDNA: mtDNA sample size = N, number of haplotypes = H, number of private haplotypes = pHap, haplotype diversity = h, nucleotide diversity = π. (b) Microsatellite genetic diversity across nine (L. harak) and 10 (L. mahsena) loci in L. harak and L. mahsena, respectively: microsatellite sample size = N, number of alleles = N A, expected heterozygosity = H E, observed heterozygosity = H O, and probability of deviation from Hardy–Weinberg expectations = p. For both mitochondrial and microsatellite data sets statistically significant estimates (p < .05) are highlighted in bold and instances where tests could not be performed are indicated as such (−)

(a) mtDNA (COI) (b) Microsatellite
N H Phap h π N N A H O H E p
Mauritius
 L. harak 22 2 0 0.42 (0.09) 0.0008 (0.0009) 43 4.00 0.52 0.45 .000
 L. mahsena 18 4 1 0.54 (0.12) 0.0017 (0.0014) 19 4.40 0.59 0.56 .023
Seychelles Mahe
 L. mahsena 3 3 2 1.00 (0.27) 0.0027 (0.0028) 12 3.60 0.58 0.50 .044
Tanzania
 L. harak 18 4 2 0.63 (0.07) 0.0015 (0.0013) 60 4.11 0.42 0.42 .000
 L. mahsena 18 5 1 0.57 (0.13) 0.0016 (0.0014) 21 4.40 0.54 0.53 .412
Mozambique Pemba
 L. harak 22 3 0 0.39 (0.11) 0.0008 (0.0008) 44 3.89 0.41 0.42 .000
 L. mahsena 3 3 0 1.00 (0.27) 0.0041 (0.0039) 7 3.10 0.46 0.45 .246
Mozambique Maputo
 L. mahsena 6 3 0 0.60 (0.22) 0.0018 (0.0020) 10 3.60 0.45 0.49 .053
Madagascar Belo sur Mer
 L. harak 42 3 0 0.47 (0.06) 0.0009 (0.0009) 100 4.78 0.42 0.42 .000
 L. mahsena 5 2 1 0.60 (0.18) 0.0012 (0.0014) 5 2.30 0.53 0.40 .991
Total
 L. harak 104 5 2 0.52 (0.03) 0.0011 (0.0019) 247 4.19 0.44 0.42 .000
 L. mahsena 53 9 7 0.59 (0.07) 0.0018 (0.0036) 72 3.57 0.52 0.49 .025