Skip to main content
. 2017 Jun 22;67(6):2046–2052. doi: 10.1099/ijsem.0.002013

Table 1. Genetic identification of hybrids between S. jurei (D5088T and D5095), S. cerevisiae (FY3), S. mikatae (IFO 1815T), S. paradoxus (N-44, N-17, YPS138), S. uvarum (CBS 7001), S. kudriavzevii (IFO 1802T), S. arboricola (CBS 10644T) and S. eubayanus (PYCC 6148T).

Hybrids engineered No. of tetrads dissected Percentage of viable ascospores of hybrids
S. jurei×S. jurei
 D5095×D5088T 640 89
S. jurei×S. cerevisiae
 D5095×FY3 624 0.30
 D5088T×FY3 612 0.50
S. jurei×S. mikatae
 D5095×IFO 1815T 648 2.0
 D5088T×IFO 1815T 472 1.0
S. jurei×S. paradoxus N-44
 D5095×N-44 484 0
 D5088T×N-44 648 0.3
S. jurei×S. paradoxus N-17
 D5095×N17 532 1.6
 D5088T×N-17 648 0
S. jurei×S. paradoxus YPS138
 D5095×YPS138 640 1.2
 D5088T×YPS138 600 0.25 
S. jurei×S. uvarum
 D5095×CBS 7001 604 0.3 
 D5088T×CBS 7001 644 0.2 
S. jurei×S. kudriavzevii
 D5095×IFO 1802T 620 0
 D5088T×IFO 1802T 614 1
S. jurei×S. arboricola
 D5095×CBS 10644T 632 0
 D5088T×CBS 10644T 648 0
S. jurei×S. eubayanus
 D5095×PYCC 6148T 632 0.2 
 D5088T×PYCC 6148T 648 0