Skip to main content
. 2017 Mar 29;153(7):666–674. doi: 10.1001/jamadermatol.2017.0002

Table 1. Characteristics of the Included Studies.

Source Country Study Design Level of Evidencea Subtype, Body Surface Area Treatment Duration Fitzpatrick Skin Type Intervention No. of Patients Age, Mean (Range), y
al-Aboosi and Ajam, 1995 Iraq Nonblind single-arm IV Generalized vitiligo, ND 6-18 mo III, IV PUVA 29 23.0 (14-32)
Westerhof and Nieuweboer-Krobotova, 1997 The Netherlands Nonblind parallel trial IIA Active, extensive, and generalized vitiligo, ND 3-12 mo II, III, IV, V 1: NBUVB
2: Topical PUVA
1: 51
2: ND
1: 36.0 (7-70)
2: 36.7 (8-63)
Njoo et al, 2000 The Netherlands Single-arm open trial IV Generalized vitiligo, ≥5% 12 mo II, III, IV, V NBUVB 51 9.9 (4-16)
Cestari et al, 2001 Brazil Double-blind parallel RCT IB Vitiligo, <2% 3 mo II, III, IV, V 1: Topical PUVA (4-dimethoxyamoidina, 2%)
2: Topical PUVA (8-MOP)
1: 14
2: 13
1: 23.9 (ND)
2: 15.2 (ND)
Ermis et al, 2001 Turkey Double-blind within-patient RCT IB Generalized vitiligo, ≥5% 3 mo II, III, IV 1: PUVA
2: PUVA + topical calcipotriol, 0.005%
1: 35
2: 35
29.8 (16-64)
Al Rubaie, 2002 United Arab Emirates Nonblind parallel RCT IB Generalized vitiligo, ND 6-12 mo IV, V 1: NBUVB
2: PUVA
3: PUVA + topical calcipotriol
1: 13
2: 9
3: 11
28.6 (9-65)
Cherif et al, 2003 Tunisia Nonblind within-patient trial III Bilateral and symmetrical NSV, ND 15 wk IV, V 1: PUVA
2: PUVA + topical calcipotriol, 0.005%
1: 23
2: 23
36 (19-73)
Park et al, 2003 Korea Nonblind single-arm IV Vitiligo, ND >6 mo III, IV, V NBUVB 13 36.6 (11-66)
Hamzavi et al, 2004 Canada Nonblind within-patient RCT IB Vitiligo on the trunk and extremities, >5% 6 mo II, III, IV, V 1: NBUVB
2: No treatment
22 47 (23-77)
Valkova et al, 2004 Bulgaria Nonblind within-patient trial III Various vitiligo, ND 4 mo II, III, IV 1: PUVA
2: Topical khellin + UV-A
17 26.1 (12-59)
Brazzelli et al, 2005 Italy Nonblind single-arm open trial IV Vitiligo in children, ND 6 mo II, III, IV NBUVB 10 9.7 (6-14)
Kanwar and Dogra, 2005 India Uncontrolled single-arm open trial IV Generalized vitiligo, ≥5% ≤12 mo IV, V NBUVB 26 10.6 (5-14)
Kanwar et al, 2005 India Nonblind single-arm trial IV Vitiligo vulgaris, ≥5% 12 mo IV, V NBUVB 15 ND (12-56)
Anbar et al, 2006 The Netherlands Uncontrolled single-arm open trial IV NSV, ND >6 mo II, III, IV NBUVB 135 24.5 (4-65)
Arca et el, 2006 Turkey Nonblind parallel RCT IB Stable NSV, ≥10% 10 wk ND 1: NBUVB
2: NBUVB + topical calcipotriol, 0.05%
1: 24
2: 13
1: 22.0 (ND)
2: 21.5 (ND)
Goktas et al, 2006 Turkey Nonblind within-patient trial IIA Generalized symmetrical NSV, ≥20% 6 mo II, III 1: NBUVB
2: NBUVB + topical calcipotriol, 0.005%
1: 28
2: 28
34.2 (16-53)
Bhatnagar et al, 2007 India Single-blind parallel RCT IB NSV, ≥5% 12 mo IV, V 1: NBUVB
2: PUVA
1: 25
2: 25
1: 29.0 (ND)
2: 26.6 (ND)
Dell’Anna et al, 2007 The Netherlands Double-blind parallel RCT IB Generalized vitiligo, ≥15% 6 mo II, III, IV, V 1: NBUVB
2: NBUVB + systemic antioxidant
1: 14
2: 21
39.9 (24-61)
Nicolaidou et al, 2007 Greece Single-arm open trial IV NSV, ≥5% 12 mo I, II, III, IV, V NBUVB 84 39.5 (8-68)
Sitek et al, 2007 Norway Single-arm open trial IV Generalized vitiligo, ND ≤12 mo II, III, IV, V NBUVB 34 ND (ND)
Yones et al, 2007 England Double-blind parallel RCT IB NSV, ≥20% I, II, III, IV, V, VI 1: NBUVB
2: PUVA
1: 25
2: 25
1: 38 (18-64)
2: 36 (18-70)
Percivalle et el, 2008 Italy Single-arm open trial IV Localized or generalized vitiligo, ND ≤12 mo II, III, IV, V, VI NBUVB 53 36.5 (3-74)
Elgoweini and Nour El Din, 2009 Egypt Nonblind parallel RCT IB Stable vitiligo, ≥20% 6 mo II, III, IV 1: NBUVB
2: NBUVB + oral antioxidant
1: 12
2: 12
1: ND (19-48)
2: ND (20-50)
Esfandiarpour et al, 2009 Iran Double-blind parallel RCT IB NSV, ND 3 mo ND 1: NBUVB
2: NBUVB + topical pimecrolimus, 1%
1: 25
2: 25
1: 34.6 (15-72)
2: 25.9 (16-56)
Kishan Kumar et al, 2009 India Single-arm open trial IV Localized and generalized vitiligo, ND ≤12 mo IV, V NBUVB 150 ND (3-70)
Stinco et al, 2009 Italy Nonblind parallel RCT IB Stable vitiligo, ND 6 mo II, III, IV 1: NBUVB
2: Topical pimecrolimus, 1%
3: Topical tacrolimus, 0.1%
1: 13
2: 15
3: 16
1: 48.8 (27-72)
2: 42.9 (27-56)
3: 43.2 (30-61)
Yuksel et al, 2009 Turkey Nonblind parallel trial IIA Generalized NSV, ≥20% 6 mo ND 1: NBUVB
2: NBUVB + topical antioxidant
1: 15
2: 15
1: 28 (18-67)
2: 33 (20-54)
Nordal et al, 2011 Norway Double-blind within-patient RCT IB Stable NSV, ND 3 mo II, III, IV, V, VI 1: NBUVB
2: NBUVB + topical tacrolimus, 0.1%
46 44.8 (23-69)
Sapam et al, 2012 Nepal Single-blind parallel RCT IB Stable NSV, >5% 6 mo IV, V
III, IV, V
1: NBUVB
2: PUVA
1: 28
2: 28
1: 31.3 (ND)
2: 29.2 (ND)
Bansal et al, 2013 India Nonblind parallel RCT IB NSV, ≥5% 5 mo ND 1: NBUVB
2: Psoralen-NBUVB
1: 20
2: 20
29.9 (ND)
El-Mofty et al, 2013 Egypt Single-blind parallel RCT IB Bilateral and symmetrical NSV, >30% 4 mo III, IV 1: NBUVB
2: Broadband UV-B
1: 20
2: 20
1: 26.9 (ND)
2: 33.3 (ND)
Satyanarayan et al, 2013 India Nonblind within-patient RCT IB Generalized NSV, 5%-50% 36 wk III, IV 1: NBUVB
2: NBUVB + topical tacrolimus, 0.1%
25 ND (14-36)
Singh et al, 2013 India Nonblind parallel RCT IB NSV, ≥2% 36 wk III, IV, V 1: PUVA (8-MOP)
2: PUVA sol
1: 18
2: 17
1: 27.3 (16-41)
2: 31.8 (12-49)
Baldo et al, 2014 Italy Nonblind within-patient RCT IB Stable vitiligo, ND 36 wk ND 1: NBUVB
2: Topical tacrolimus, 0.1%
48 27.0 (6-67)
Khullar et al, 2014 India Nonblind within-patient RCT IB Slowly progressive NSV, 5%-50% 24 wk III, IV, V 1: NBUVB
2: NBUVB + topical calcipotriol, 0.005%
27 24.4 (12-37)

Abbreviations: MOP, methoxypsoralen; NBUVB, narrowband UV-B; ND, not determined; NSV, nonsegmental vitiligo; PUVA, psoralen–UV-A; RCT, randomized clinical trial.

a

IB indicates randomized controlled studies; IIA, nonrandomized controlled studies; III, comparative studies, correlation studies, and case-control studies; and IV, expert committee reports or opinions and case reports.