Skip to main content
. 2017 Apr 19;153(7):644–650. doi: 10.1001/jamadermatol.2017.0204

Table 2. Diagnostic and Management Concordance Between PCPs, Teledermatologists, and In-Clinic Dermatologists.

Concordance Comparison (Total No. of Cases Compared) Discordant, No. (%) of Cases Partially
Concordant Level 1, No. (%) of Casesa,b
Partially
Concordant Level 2, No. (%) of Casesa,b
Completely Concordant, No. (%) of Cases Observed Concordance (Partial 1 and 2 and Completely), No. (%) of Cases Expected Concordance (Partial 1 and 2 and Completely), %c 1-Sided P Value Using Yates Correction (95% CI)d
PCP vs tele 1 diagnosis (79) 49 (62) 9 (11) 10 (13) 11 (14) 30 (38) 68 >.99 (27-49)
Tele 1 vs tele 2 diagnosis (79) 0 10 (13) 44 (56) 25 (32) 79 (100) 88 .001
Tele 1 vs derm clinic diagnosis (29) 3 (10) 5 (17) 10 (35) 11 (38) 26 (90) 67 .008 (79-100)
PCP vs tele 1 management (79) 44 (56) 8 (10) 23 (29) 4 (5) 35 (44) 61 .99 (33-55)
Tele 1 vs tele 2 management (79) 12 (15) 4 (5) 33 (42) 30 (38) 67 (85) 75 .03 (77-93)

Abbreviations: Derm, in-person dermatologist; PCP, primary care physician; tele, teledermatologist.

a

Diagnostic concordance: Discordant, no agreement or differential diagnosis not provided. Partially concordant level 1, agreement between at least 1 but not all diagnoses. Partially concordant level 2, agreement between diagnostic categories only (from Table 1). Concordant, full agreement.

b

Management concordance: Discordant, no agreement or management plan not provided. Partially concordant level 1, partial agreement with 1 category of change only. Partially concordant level 2, partial agreement with more than 1 category of change. Concordant, full agreement.

c

Expected concordance percentage was assigned based on previously published studies.

d

One-sample proportions tests using a Yates correction were performed to compare observed vs expected concordances between the physicians’ diagnoses and management recommendations. Probability that event was larger than expected [null hypothesis]. A 1-sided P value <.05 was considered significant. Bold font indicates statistical significance.