Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Nov 15.
Published in final edited form as: Opt Lett. 2017 Nov 15;42(22):4573–4576. doi: 10.1364/OL.42.004573

Fig. 5.

Fig. 5

Gaussian fit comparisons for experimental data: Fit parameters for CS and GIRAF reconstructions are shown. Error bars represent 95% confidence bounds. CS reconstruction for undersampling factor 20 are not reported in the plot because it could not be fitted to the model due to severe distortion of the lineshape. Lineshape fits for CS reconstruction degrade rapidly with increasing acceleration factor whereas the GIRAF results are within ± 10% of the true fits.