Skip to main content
. 2018 Feb 1;6(3):e13517. doi: 10.14814/phy2.13517

Figure 2.

Figure 2

OEA did not affect locomotor activity or food intake when measurements started 1‐h postadministration. (A) locomotor activity in an open field test 1‐h post‐OEA (10 mg/kg BW) or veh administration (n = 10), Student t‐test, ns. (B–I) food intake and meal pattern analysis 1‐h post‐OEA (10 mg/kg BW) or veh administration (n = 10). Short‐term (4 h) food intake (B), 2‐way ANOVA, group F(1,9) = 1.497 ns, time F(3,27) = 124.9 P < 0.01, group × time F(3,27) = 1.589 ns. 24 h food intake (C), Student t‐test, ns. Latency to eat (D), Mann–Whitney U test, ns. First meal size (E), average meal size (F), number of meals (G) satiety ratio (H), intermeal interval (I), Student t‐tests, all ns. Results are presented as means ± SEM. veh = vehicle, ns = not statistically significant.