Skip to main content
. 2018 Jan 15;5(1):27–39. doi: 10.1530/ERP-17-0047

Table 3.

Inter-observer differences of LVEF and GLS assessed with Vivid 7 and Vivid E95.

Vivid 7 Vivid E95
LVEF LVEF
r Bias P value LOA % variability ICC r Bias P value LOA % variability ICC
Expert vs Fellow A 0.89 −0.3 .1867 ±7.4 6.5% 0.888 0.89 0.2 .3118 ±6.9 5.3% 0.893
Expert vs Fellow B 0.87 −1.5 <.0001 ±8.0 7.4% 0.859 0.87 −1.1 <.0001 ±7.4 6.5% 0.859
Fellow A vs Fellow B 0.88 −1.2 <.0001 ±7.8 7.1% 0.871 0.86 −1.3 <.0001 ±8.0 6.3% 0.848
GLS GLS
r Bias P value LOA % variability ICC r Bias P value LOA % variability ICC
Expert vs Fellow A 0.93 −0.8 <.0001 ±2.5 8.1% 0.900 0.95 −0.3 <.0001 ±2.0 5.5% 0.945
Expert vs Fellow B 0.91 −0.9 <.0001 ±2.9 8.8% 0.882 0.93 −0.5 <.0001 ±2.5 6.7% 0.916
Fellow A vs Fellow B 0.92 −0.1 .5426 ±2.6 7.2% 0.900 0.94 −0.1 .0234 ±2.2 5.9% 0.936

GLS, global longitudinal strain; ICC, intra-class correlation coefficient; LOA, limits of agreement; LVEF, left ventricular ejection fraction.