Skip to main content
. 2018 Feb 19;5(2):025001. doi: 10.1117/1.NPh.5.2.025001

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3

Evaluating performance of mirror scanners. (a) Diagram of galvanometer or resonant scanner with input beam diameter d. Given d and the clear aperture of the galvanometer W, the maximum scan angle θm,g can be determined. (b) Diagram of spinning polygonal scanner with clear aperture W, input beam diameter d, beam footprint on the facet dm, and feed angle α. (c) Line rate of galvanometer mirrors, resonant scanners, and polygonal scanners. Parts are listed in Appendix B. (d) Maximum scan angle of scanners plotted as a function of input beam diameter for the nine scanners calculated using Eqs. (12) and (15). (e) Optical invariant of scanners in isolation plotted as a function of input beam diameter to scanner. Curves are colored according to legend in (d). Also shown is the optical invariant of a conventional TPM system (dashed green line) and the two macro-objectives: XLFLUOR4X (dashed red line) and MVPLAPO 2XC (dashed blue line). Comparison of (c) and (e) demonstrates trade-off between speed and throughput.