Table 3.

Critical Appraisal Skills Program Quality Assessment of the Reviewed Articles.

Authors	Item 1	Item 2	Item 3	Item 4	Item 5	Item 6	Item 7	Item 8	Item 9	Item 10	Item 11	Item 12	Total quality score (0 to 12)
Eltas et al. (2013)	Yes	Yes	No	Yes	Yes	No	Yes	Yes	No	No	Yes	Yes	8
Keller et al. (2012)	Yes	Yes	No	Yes	Yes	No	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	10
J. H. Lee et al. (2015)	Yes	Yes	No	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	9
Matsumoto et al. (2014)	Yes	Yes	No	No	No	No	Yes	Yes	No	Yes	Yes	Yes	7
Oguz et al. (2013)	Yes	Yes	No	Yes	Yes	No	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	10
Sharma et al. (2011)	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	12
Tsao et al. (2015)	Yes	Yes	No	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	11
Uppal et al. (2014)	Yes	No	No	Yes	Yes	No	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	9
Zadik et al. (2009)	Yes	Yes	No	No	No	No	Yes	Yes	No	Yes	Yes	Yes	7