Skip to main content
. 2018 Jan 29;7:e31130. doi: 10.7554/eLife.31130

Figure 4. Regional clustering results.

(a) regions from the CoCoMac data organized according to rich club (red), feeder (blue) or local (green) status, along with a force-directed plot of the top 10% of connections (aligned by hemisphere), colored according to structural hub connectivity status; (b) the rich club cluster demonstrated an increase in realized mean gain (the relative output as a function of its’ unique topology) at the bifurcation boundary, compared to feeder and local nodes, which showed higher realized gain at high levels of σ and γ; (c) the three clusters of regions also demonstrated differential responses to neural gain; and (d) excitability. The black lines in (c) and (d) denote significant differences in BA between the two groups.

Figure 4.

Figure 4—figure supplement 1. Diverse Club.

Figure 4—figure supplement 1.

(a) regional differences in integration (BA) as a function of changes in neural gain; and (b) excitability, separated into regions within or outside the diverse club.
Figure 4—figure supplement 2. Clustering coefficient.

Figure 4—figure supplement 2.

(a) clustering coefficient across the parameter space; (b) as a function of changes in neural gain; and (c) excitability.