Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 Mar 1.
Published in final edited form as: Trends Pharmacol Sci. 2017 Dec 9;39(3):295–306. doi: 10.1016/j.tips.2017.11.008

Combination Therapies Targeting HDAC and IKK in Solid Tumors

Ivana Vancurova 1,*, Mohammad M Uddin 1, Yue Zou 1, Ales Vancura 1
PMCID: PMC5818305  NIHMSID: NIHMS925493  PMID: 29233541

Abstract

The rationale for developing histone deacetylase (HDAC) inhibitors (HDACi) as anti-cancer agents was based on their ability to induce apoptosis and cell cycle arrest in cancer cells. However, while HDACi have been remarkably effective in treatment of hematological malignancies, clinical studies with HDACi as single agents in solid cancers have been disappointing. Recent studies have shown that in addition to inducing apoptosis in cancer cells, class I HDACi induce IκB-kinase (IKK)-dependent expression of pro-inflammatory chemokines, such as interleukin-8 (CXCL8), resulting in increased proliferation of tumor cells, and limiting the effectiveness of HDACi in solid tumors. Here, we discuss the mechanisms responsible for the HDACi-induced CXCL8 expression, and opportunities for combination therapies targeting HDACs and IKK in solid tumors.

Keywords: Combination therapies, histone deacetylases (HDACs), histone deacetylase inhibitors (HDACi), interleukin-8 (IL-8, CXCL8), IκB kinase (IKK), solid cancers

Development of HDACi

Histone deacetylases (HDACs; see Glossary) are epigenetic modulators that remove acetyl groups from histone and non-histone proteins, and play an important role in the regulation of gene expression. In general, increased acetylation is associated with transcriptional induction, while decreased acetylation is associated with transcriptional repression. Based on their function and sequence homology, HDACs are grouped into four classes, class I–IV (Box 1). Increased expression of HDACs, particularly class I HDACs, has been associated with a variety of cancers, including hematological malignancies and solid cancers, and correlates with poor prognosis and development of chemoresistance [1].

Box 1. Classification of HDACs.

Class I HDACs are localized mainly in the nucleus; they include HDACs 1, 2, 3, and 8. Class II HDACs are localized both in the nucleus and in the cytoplasm; they include HDACs 4–7, 9, and 10. Class IV contains only HDAC 11, which shares sequence similarity with HDACs class I and II. In contrast to HDACs class I, II, and IV, class III HDACs, or sirtuins, do not contain zinc, but require nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide (NAD+) for their catalytic activity.

The rationale for developing HDAC inhibitors (HDACi) as anti-cancer agents was based on their ability to induce hyperacetylation of histones and non-histone proteins, resulting in increased differentiation, apoptosis, and cell cycle arrest of cancer cells [13]. HDACi have been used in the treatment of hematological malignancies, since they exhibit excellent differential action on normal and cancer cells at therapeutic dosages [13]. In contrast, clinical trials with HDACi as single agents in the treatment of solid tumors have produced disappointing results, but the specific responsible mechanisms are largely unknown. These mechanisms are likely multifactorial, and may include a limited distribution of HDACi in solid tumors, inactivation of specific anti-tumor immune responses, and increased expression of IκB kinase (IKK)-dependent pro-inflammatory and pro-angiogenic chemokines in solid cancer cells, thus limiting effectiveness of HDACi in solid tumors. This review specifically focuses on the mechanisms of how HDACi induce IKK-dependent transcription of pro-inflammatory and pro-angiogenic chemokines, particularly interleukin-8 (CXCL8), in solid cancer cells, and on the opportunities for combination therapies targeting HDACs and IKK in solid tumors. Since HDACs class I, particularly HDAC1, 2, and 3, are involved in the HDACi-induced pro-inflammatory gene expression in solid tumor cells, this review focuses mainly on these HDACs.

HDACi effects are cell and gene specific

HDACi are structurally diverse compounds that can be divided into several classes, including hydroxamates, cyclic peptides, aliphatic acids, ketones, and benzamides. Four HDACi have been approved by FDA as of 2017: Vorinostat (suberoylanilide hydroxamic acid, SAHA, Zolinza), which is the first FDA approved HDACi and has been used to treat cutaneous T cell lymphoma (CTCL); romidepsin (depsipeptide, FK228, Istodax), which has been used to treat CTCL and peripheral T-cell lymphoma (PTCL); belinostat (PXD101, Beleodaq), approved for PTCL; and panobinostat (LBH589, Farydak), which has been used to treat patients with multiple myeloma (MM). In addition, many other HDACi have been tested in pre-clinical studies and clinical trials, either as a monotherapy or in combination therapies. Since HDACi have many different, often opposing, cellular effects, combination therapies will likely be more effective than a monotherapy. Some HDACi, such as vorinostat, belinostat, and panobinostat are non-selective (pan-inhibitors), and inhibit all HDACs, while other HDACi are class, or even isozyme specific. For example, romidepsin specifically inhibits class I HDACs, particularly HDAC 1, 2, and 3 [4].

Since HDACi induce hyperacetylation of histones and non-histone proteins, they can reactivate tumor suppressor genes and regulate key oncogenic signaling pathways. In addition to increasing acetylation of histones, HDACi induce acetylation of tumor suppressors, such as p53 and RUNX3, proto-oncogenes, including c-myc, and transcription factors involved in immune regulation and cancer signaling, such as the STAT transcription factors, hypoxia-inducible factor-1α (HIF-1α), Foxp3, and NFκB [1, 59]. By increasing acetylation of histones and different transcription factors, HDACi can both induce and repress gene expression, thus providing a rationale why so many genes are differentially regulated by HDACi. Gene expression profiling studies have shown that HDACi affect expression of approximately 2–10% genes, with approximately equal number of genes being activated and suppressed [1012]. HDACi exhibit their anti-cancer effect by increasing expression of the cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor p21, resulting in cell cycle arrest and differentiation; increasing apoptosis by upregulating pro-apoptotic genes and downregulating anti-apoptotic genes; regulating DNA damage, ROS production, proteasome activity and DNA repair; and increasing ER stress and autophagy [2, 13]. In addition, HDACi regulate immune recognition of cancer cells by increasing expression of MHC class I and II molecules [14, 15], inducing expression of PD-L1 [16, 17], and promoting differentiation and function of regulatory T cells [18].

Importantly, the HDACi-mediated effect is cell- and HDAC-specific; different effects and outcomes have been observed in different cell types, and targeting different HDAC isoforms. While HDACi exhibit a strong pro-apoptotic potential in human leukemia cells [1922], they have a limited ability to induce apoptosis in solid cancer cells [2325]. While HDAC inhibition by vorinostat inhibits CXCL8 expression in CTCL Hut-78 cells, it increases CXCL8 expression in ovarian cancer (OC) cells [26, 27]. Targeting class I HDACs induces IL-10 expression in macrophages, whereas HDAC6 suppression inhibits IL-10 production in macrophages [2830]. HDAC6 effectively deacetylates tubulin dimers, but the deacetylation rate of tubulin polymeric forms is much slower [31]. Identification of cellular targets of the individual HDACs and HDACi in different cell types is crucial for the development of targeted HDAC-based anti-cancer strategies.

HDACi have anti-inflammatory effect in stimulated leukocytes, but pro-inflammatory and pro-angiogenic effect in solid cancer cells

Even though HDACi were originally developed as anti-cancer drugs, based on their ability to induce apoptosis in hematopoietic malignancies, they also exhibit anti-inflammatory properties. In most immune cells including monocytic cells, macrophages, and dendritic cells stimulated with lipopolysaccharide or TNF, HDACi suppress expression of NFκB-dependent pro-inflammatory cytokines including TNF, IL-1, and IL-6 [3237]. Intriguingly however, in solid cancer cells characterized by constitutively increased NFκB activity, HDACi actually increase expression of NFκB-dependent pro-inflammatory genes, and this is associated with increased survival, proliferation, and migration of solid cancer cells (Table 1).

Table 1.

HDACi induce NFκB-dependent pro-inflammatory and pro-survival gene expression in solid cancer cells

HDACi HDAC involved Effect on NFκB-dependent transcription Cells Reference
TSA, apicidin HDAC 1, 2 Induction of IKK-dependent CXCL8 and cIAP1 expression associated with increased resistance to apoptosis HeLa cells [3840]
Romidepsin, TSA, butyrate, vorinostat Induction of CXCL8, CXCL9, CXCL10, Bcl-xL, MM 9, CXCR1, CXCR2; increased resistance to apoptosis Lung cancer cells [16, 23, 24, 41]
TSA Induction of IKK-dependent CXCL8 expression Breast cancer cells [42]
CI994, romidepsin, vorinostat HDAC 1, 2, 3 Induction of IKK-dependent CXCL8 expression; increased resistance to apoptosis Ovarian cancer cells [26, 27]

In cervical cancer HeLa cells, inhibition of HDAC class I and II activity by trichostatin A (TSA) increased both basal and TNF-induced NFκB-dependent CXCL8 expression [38, 39]. HDAC1 and HDAC2 were found to regulate the NFκB transcriptional activity through a direct association of HDAC1 with the Rel homology domain of p65. While HDAC2 does not seem to interact with p65 directly, it can regulate NFκB activity through its association with HDAC1 [38]. The CXCL8 expression, as well as expression of the NFκB-dependent pro-survival gene cIAP1, was induced in HeLa cells also by apicidin, which preferentially inhibits HDAC class I [40]. The apicidin-induced CXCL8 and cIAP1 expression in HeLa cells was mediated by IKK, and associated with resistance to apicidin-induced apoptosis [40]. Inhibition of HDAC activity by pan-HDACi failed to induce apoptosis also in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) cells, and this was associated with increased transactivation potential of p65, recruitment of the p300 transcriptional co-activator and histone acetyltransferase (HAT) to chromatin, and increased expression of CXCL8, Bcl-xL, and MMP9 [23, 24]. Interestingly, in addition to inducing expression of CXCL8 in NSCLC cells, TSA induced expression of CXCL8 receptors CXCR1 and CXCR2 that are also regulated by NFκB, while it suppressed expression of CXCL1, CXCL2, and CXCL3 [41]. Inhibition of class I HDACs by romidepsin also induced CXCL9 and CXCL10 expression in human lung cancer cells, mouse lung tumors, and tumor-infiltrating macrophages and T cells [16]. In human breast cancer cells, TSA induced IKK-dependent CXCL8 expression and release that were associated with increased histone H3 promoter acetylation and nuclear p65 accumulation [42]. In human ovarian cancer cells, inhibitors of HDACs 1, 2, and 3, CI994 and romidepsin, but not inhibitors of HDACs class II, specifically induced the IKK-dependent CXCL8 expression that was associated with increased p65 promoter recruitment [26, 27]. Suppression or neutralization of the CXCL8 induced by class I HDACi in OC cells increased their pro-apoptotic and anti-proliferative effect [26, 27].

Interleukin-8 (CXCL8), originally discovered as the neutrophil chemoattractant and inducer of leukocyte-mediated inflammation, is a pro-inflammatory and pro-angiogenic chemokine that contributes to cancer progression through its induction of tumor cell proliferation, survival, and migration [4346]. Increased production of CXCL8 confers a tremendous growth advantage to malignant cells, and increased CXCL8 levels correlate with poor prognosis in solid tumors, including ovarian, breast, lung, and prostate cancer [4651]. Interestingly, recent studies have shown that HDACi induce the CXCL8 expression also in cancer associated fibroblasts (CAF) [52, 53]. The HDACi-induced CXCL8 released by solid tumor cells and CAF then activates tumor-associated macrophages and neutrophils to release more CXCL8, which further amplifies the pro-angiogenic and metastatic effect (Figure 1). Since suppression of the HDACi-induced CXCL8 release potentiates the cytotoxic and pro-apoptotic effect of HDACi [26], these data indicate that targeting the HDACi-induced, IKK-dependent expression of CXCL8, and other pro-inflammatory chemokines, may increase effectiveness of HDACi in ovarian cancer and other solid tumors characterized by the HDACi-induced chemokine expression.

Figure 1. Role of HDACi-induced CXCL8 in promoting proliferation, angiogenesis, and metastasis in solid tumors.

Figure 1

In solid cancer cells and cancer-associated fibroblasts (CAF), HDACi induce expression of CXCL8, which induces tumor cell proliferation, survival, and migration. In addition, the increased expression of CXCL8 activates tumor-associated macrophages (TAM) and neutrophils to release more CXCL8, which further amplifies the proangiogenic and metastatic effect.

HDACi effect on proteasomal regulation of IκBα and p65 levels

At the transcriptional level, expression of CXCL8, as well as many other pro-inflammatory chemokines, is regulated by the transcription factor NFκB, which is constitutively activated in solid cancers including ovarian, lung, and breast cancer, and conveys a poor outcome [5456]. Activation of NFκB is mediated by the enzymes of IKK complex that consists of two catalytic subunits, IKKα and IKKβ, and a regulatory subunit IKKγ (NEMO). IKK phosphorylates the NFκB inhibitor, IκBα, resulting in IκBα proteasomal degradation and nuclear translocation of NFκB subunits [57, 58]. In addition to phosphorylating IκBα, IKKs can phosphorylate histones and p65 NFκB, thus increasing p65 acetylation, promoter recruitment, and transcriptional activity [57, 58]. While the proteasomal degradation of IκBα, resulting in the nuclear translocation and accumulation of NFκB subunits, represents a general step in NFκB activation, specificity and duration of NFκB-regulated responses are mediated by the protein composition of NFκB complexes and their post-translational modifications [5963]. The NFκB family includes five structurally related proteins, p65 (RelA), p50, p52, c-Rel, and RelB, which form homo- and heterodimers; p65/p50 heterodimers are the most abundant dimers. In addition to IκBα, the p65 subunit of NFκB can also undergo proteasomal degradation [63]. Thus, inhibition of proteasome activity can stabilize both IκBα and p65 NFκB, potentially resulting in two diametrically different outcomes in the regulation of NFκB-transcriptional activity.

Since HDACi can modulate the proteasome activity [5, 64, 65], they can inhibit or activate the NFκB-dependent transcription, depending on the cellular context. Inhibition of HDAC activity with pan-HDACi reduces expression of the catalytic beta subunit of the proteasome, resulting in the inhibition of the inducible proteasomal degradation of IκBα [65]. Therefore, in stimulated immune cells, HDAC inhibition is likely to inhibit the inducible cytoplasmic degradation of IκBα thus preventing the nuclear translocation of NFκB subunits and NFκB dependent transcription, as was observed is stimulated leukocytes [3237]. The importance of cell stimulation for the HDACi-mediated suppression of NFκB-dependent transcription is evident from the study by Grabiec et al [35]. In the absence of cell stimulation, exposure of human macrophages to TSA had no influence on basal IL-6 or TNF expression, but TSA inhibited IL-6 and TNF expression in TNF- or LPS-stimulated macrophages [35].

However, in most cancer cells, NFκB is constitutively activated, and the NFκB proteins are already localized in the nucleus. Thus, the HDACi-mediated stabilization of cytoplasmic IκBα is likely to have a little effect on the nuclear levels and activity of NFκB in cancer cells. Instead, HDACi may prevent the proteasomal degradation of nuclear p65, thus increasing its nuclear accumulation and promoter binding (Figure 2). Indeed, several studies have demonstrated that HDACi increase the nuclear p65 levels in cancer cells [24, 26, 39, 40, 66]. For example, in NSCLC and OC cells, pan-HDACi induce the IKK-dependent p65 nuclear accumulation, resulting in the increased CXCL8 expression [24, 26]. Furthermore, several studies have shown that HDACi increase IKK activity and IKK-dependent promoter and p65 acetylation, resulting in the increased p65 transcriptional activity in cancer cells [23, 26, 38, 39, 66, 67].

Figure 2. HDACi have anti-inflammatory effect in stimulated immune cells, but pro-inflammatory and pro-angiogenic effect in solid cancer cells.

Figure 2

In stimulated immune cells, the HDACi-mediated suppression of proteasome activity inhibits the cytoplasmic degradation of IκBα, thus preventing the inducible nuclear translocation of NFκB subunits and NFκB-dependent transcription. In contrast, in most solid cancer cells, NFκB is constitutively activated, and the NFκB proteins are already localized in the nucleus. Thus, the HDACi-mediated stabilization of cytoplasmic IκBα has a little effect on the nuclear levels of NFκB in solid cancer cells. Instead, HDACi prevent the proteasomal degradation of nuclear p65, causing its increased nuclear accumulation. In addition, HDAC inhibition increases IKK activity, and IKK-dependent p65 acetylation. Since HDAC inhibition in cancer cells increases the nuclear levels of p65, NFκB-dependent genes, such as CXCL8, regulated by p65 homodimers, may be specifically increased by HDAC inhibition in solid cancer cells.

HDACi-induced CXCL8 expression in solid cancer cells is p65- and IKK-dependent

In contrast to other NFκB-dependent genes, the CXCL8 transcription is regulated predominantly by NFκB p65 homodimers [68, 69]. Seven acetylated lysines have been identified within p65 NFκB: K122, 123, 218, 221, 310, 314, and 315 [62]. Acetylation of K122 and 123 reduces p65 binding to DNA, and promotes its nuclear export [70]. Acetylation of K221 enhances p65 DNA binding and impairs its binding to IκBα, while acetylation of K310 is required for full transcriptional activity of p65 [60]. Interestingly, acetylation of p65 at K314 and 315 does not affect p65 DNA binding, but facilitates its promoter specificity in stimulated cells [71, 72]. Acetylation of p65 is regulated by the HATs, p300 and CBP, and HDAC1, 2, and 3 [38, 7379]. However, the specific regulation of p65 by the individual HATs and HDACs differs in different cells and tissues, and may depend on the cellular status of other transcription factors and co-regulators. For example, while p65 was reported to directly interact with HDAC2 in kidney mesangial cells [80], such interaction was not observed in other cell types [38, 70, 78]. Since different acetylation sites differentially regulate the p65 functions and promoter specificity, modulation of p65 acetylation by targeting specific HATs and HDACs might prove useful in targeting specific NFκB-dependent genes.

However, HDACi can also increase acetylation of other transcription factors that regulate the p65 transcriptional activity. The HDACi-induced activation of p65 can be negated by acetylated STAT1, which can specifically bind to p65 and inhibit its transcriptional activity [8183]. Interestingly, acetylated STAT1 was found in chemotherapy sensitive but not resistant ovarian cancer cells [84]. Since activated NFκB mediates chemoresistance by inducing expression of pro-survival genes [58], these data suggest that the HDACi-induced STAT1 acetylation may suppress the p65-mediated expression of pro-survival genes, thus modulating chemoresistance. In addition, HDACi can modulate p53 activity and its interaction with p65, thus representing yet another mechanism regulating the p65-dependent transcription [6, 85].

The CXCL8 expression is specifically regulated by class I HDACs, particularly HDAC1, 2, and 3 [27, 77, 86, 87]. However, since acetylation of different lysines can both activate and inhibit the p65 transcriptional activity, HDACs can both induce and repress the CXCL8 expression. Indeed, suppression of HDAC1, 2, and 3 was reported to both inhibit and induce the CXCL8 expression, depending on the cell type, stimulus, and presence of additional transcriptional regulators [27, 77, 86, 87]. In breast cancer cells, knockdown of HDAC1 specifically suppressed the CXCL8 expression, resulting in their reduced proliferation and migration [86]. In contrast, in lung cancer cells infected with respiratory syncytial virus, the CXCL8 transcription was inhibited by Bcl3-mediated recruitment of HDAC1, indicating that HDAC1 attenuates the CXL8 promoter activity under these conditions [87]. Interestingly, while an individual suppression of HDAC1, HDAC2, or HDAC3 inhibited the CXCL8 expression in ovarian cancer cells, their simultaneous suppression induced the CXCL8 expression, suggesting that HDAC1, 2, and 3 may form complexes with other transcriptional regulators, and suppression of HDAC protein levels in these complexes disrupts their function and reduces the CXCL8 transcription [27]. In this context, previous studies have shown that in addition to p65, HDAC1, 2, and 3 form complexes with IκBα, NuRD, N-CoR/SMRT, and other transcriptional activators and repressors important for cancer cell survival and growth [38, 70, 73, 74]. Thus, the impact of pharmacologic inhibition of HDACs will likely differ from the effect of HDAC protein suppression.

Intriguingly, in ovarian cancer cells, class I HDACi dramatically increase only the CXCL8 expression, while they do not have any substantial effect on the expression of other NFκB-dependent genes, including TNFα, IL-6, CXCL5, TGFβ1, cIAP-1, Bcl-2, p65, p50, IκBα, CXCR-1, and CXCR2 [26, 27]. The HDACi-induced CXCL8 expression in OC cells is mediated by a gene specific, IKKβ-dependent recruitment of p65 homodimers to CXCL8 promoter. In addition, HDAC inhibition increases K314/315 acetylation of p65, and its promoter-specific occupancy at the CXCL8 promoter [26]. The HDACi-induced CXCL8 expression is mediated by IKKβ and p65 NFκB also in breast cancer cells [42]. Why do HDACi induce predominantly the CXCL8 expression in solid cancer cells? Since HDACi increase the nuclear levels of p65 in cancer cells [24, 26, 39, 40, 66], they may specifically increase expression of genes regulated by p65 homodimers. In addition, the HDACi-increased K314/315 acetylation of p65 may favor its specific recruitment to CXCL8 promoter, as was observed in OC cells [26]. Thus, the HDACi-induced CXCL8 expression in solid tumor cells is likely a result of several HDACi-mediated mechanisms that include the HDACi-increased nuclear accumulation of p65, increased IKK activity and IKK-dependent p65 K314/315 acetylation, and promoter-specific recruitment of K314/315 acetylated p65 homodimers to CXCL8 promoter (Figure 2).

Opportunities for combination therapies targeting HDAC and IKK in solid tumors

Inhibition of IKK activity decreases the CXCL8 expression induced by HDAC inhibition in ovarian cancer cells [26]. Since CXCL8 induces proliferation and survival in cancer cells [26, 4448], these data indicate that therapies targeting the IKK-mediated CXCL8 expression may increase effectiveness of HDACi in OC treatment. This is supported by in vitro data demonstrating that suppression of the HDACi-induced CXCL8 by siRNAs, or its neutralization by anti-CXCL8 monoclonal antibodies, increase the HDACi pro-apoptotic and anti-proliferative effect in OC cells [26], and by in vivo studies demonstrating that suppression of CXCL8 reduces ovarian tumor growth [47, 48]. In addition, Sonnemann et al. have shown that HDACi and aspirin synergistically induce cell death in OC cells, independently of cyclo-oxygenase [88]. Since aspirin and other nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), in addition to inhibiting cyclooxygenase activity, inhibit IKK activity [89], it seems plausible that the observed synergistic effect in OC cells might have been mediated by IKK inhibition and suppression of the HDACi-induced CXCL8 expression. Disruption of NFκB-signaling potentiates the HDACi pro-apoptotic effect also in other solid cancer cells, including NSCLC, head and neck squamous cell carcinomas, prostate cancer cells, hepatocellular carcinoma, and thyroid cancer [23, 24, 40, 9094].

Importantly, our recent in vivo results have demonstrated that combining HDAC and IKK inhibitors significantly reduces ovarian tumor growth when compared to either drug alone [26]. The slowest tumor growth in the HDACi/IKK inhibition combination group was associated with the lowest CXCL8 tumor and plasma levels, and with the lowest tumor expression of the murine neutrophil [7/4] antigen, indicating a reduced tumor infiltration with mouse neutrophils. Recent studies have demonstrated a key role of the CXC chemokine receptor, CXCR2, in pancreatic cancer development and progression [95, 96]. Inhibition of the CXCR2 signaling significantly reduced metastases, prolonged survival, and enhanced sensitivity to anti-PD-1 immunotherapy in a mouse model of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma [95]. The CXCL8-CXCR1/2 signaling plays a crucial role in the initiation and progression of solid tumors [46]. Thus, targeting the HDACi-induced, IKK-dependent CXCL8 expression may increase effectiveness of HDACi in treating ovarian cancer and possibly other solid tumors characterized by the increased CXCL8 expression (Figure 3, Key Figure).

Figure 3. IKK inhibition increases effectiveness of HDACi in solid tumors by suppressing the HDACi-induced, IKK-dependent CXCL8 expression.

Figure 3

While HDAC inhibition induces apoptosis in cancer cells, it also increases IKK-dependent expression of CXCL8, which induces tumor growth. Inhibition of IKK activity suppresses the induced CXCL8 expression, thus potentiating the pro-apoptotic effect of HDAC inhibitors, and increasing their effectiveness in reducing tumor growth.

Targeting IKK activity and NFκB-dependent expression of pro-survival genes induced by HDACi has been investigated in the treatment of hematological malignancies [66, 67, 97, 98]. Inhibition of IKK activity and NFκB signaling by Bay 11-7082 or parthenolide potentiated the HDACi-mediated cell death in leukemia cells [66, 97]. Inhibition of IKK activity by Bay 11-7082 or the selective IKKβ inhibitor IKK-2 inhibitor IV also augmented the HDACi-pro-apoptotic effect in multiple myeloma cells [67]. A novel IKKβ inhibitor, LY2409881, exhibited a strong cytotoxic synergistic effect with romidepsin in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) cell lines as well as in vivo, in a DLBCL xenograft model [98]. In addition, the HDACi-induced activation of NFκB in hematological malignancies has served as the basis of many synergistic strategies combining HDACi with proteasome inhibitors that suppress the proteasomal degradation of IκBα [2].

In contrast to hematological malignancies, combination of IKK and HDAC inhibitors has not been considered in the treatment of solid tumors, perhaps because of the limited effectiveness of HDACi in solid cancers as single agents. Many compounds can inhibit IKK activity, including the IKK inhibitors PS1145, BMS345541, SC514, SPC839, ML120B, BAY 11-7082, and the newly developed IKKβ inhibitor LY2409881. In addition, IKK activity can be inhibited by NSAIDs, such as aspirin [89], and by naturally occurring agents, such as curcumin [93, 99], which are pharmacologically safe and have long been used for their chemopreventive and anti-inflammatory properties. Even though IKK inhibitors are not highly potent as single agents, accumulating evidence indicates that they may synergize with HDACi in treating solid cancers [26, 27, 42, 88, 91, 93, 100]. The mechanistic basis of this synergy consists of the HDACi-induced and IKK-dependent expression of CXCL8, which increases survival and proliferation of solid cancer cells. Inhibition of IKK activity suppresses the induced CXCL8 expression, thus potentiating the effectiveness of HDACi in reducing solid tumor growth.

Concluding Remarks and Future Perspectives

Even though HDACi have been remarkably effective in treating hematological malignancies, they have produced poor results in solid cancers. Several mechanisms likely contribute to the limited effectiveness of HDACi in solid tumors; the induced IKK-dependent CXCL8 expression may represent one of these mechanisms. Since different HDACs and mechanisms may regulate the p65 CXCL8 promoter occupancy and transactivation potential in different cell types, it will be important to identify the specific HDACs and mechanisms responsible for the HDACi-induced CXCL8 expression in different types of solid cancers (see Outstanding Questions). In addition, it will be important to determine whether HDACi induce the CXCL8 expression in primary patient samples, particularly in patients with hematological malignancies vs. solid tumors. It may be possible that HDACi induce CXCL8 expression only in selected solid tumors, and in these cancers, targeting the induced CXCL8 expression may increase the HDACi effectiveness. Thus, determining in which patient samples HDACi induce CXCL8 expression may identify patients who would respond to the HDACi/IKK inhibition combination therapies.

Outstanding Questions.

  • What are the specific mechanisms responsible for the HDACi-induced CXCL8 expression in different types of solid cancers?

  • Do HDACi induce CXCL8 expression in primary cancer patient samples, and is there a difference between hematological malignancies and solid tumors?

  • Could screening of primary solid cancer samples for the HDACi-induced CXCL8 expression identify tumors that would respond to the HDACi/IKK inhibition combination therapies?

  • Can anti-inflammatory, IKK-inhibiting drugs increase effectiveness of HDACi in ovarian cancer and other solid cancers characterized by increased CXCL8 expression?

Targeting IKK activity and NFκB-dependent transcription induced by HDAC inhibition has been investigated in the treatment of multiple myeloma and other hematological malignancies. In solid tumors, combination of IKK and HDAC inhibitors has never been considered, perhaps because of their limited effectiveness as single agents. Recent data indicate that by suppressing the CXCL8 expression, IKK inhibitors may increase effectiveness of HDAC inhibitors in ovarian cancer and other solid cancers characterized by the increased CXCL8 expression (Figure 3). Future studies and clinical trials should examine the effect of IKK inhibiting agents on increasing the effectiveness of HDAC inhibitors in ovarian cancer and other solid cancers characterized by the increased CXCL8 expression.

Trends Box.

  • The rationale for developing histone deacetylase (HDAC) inhibitors as anti-cancer agents was based on their ability to induce apoptosis and cell cycle arrest in cancer cells.

  • While HDAC inhibitors are very effective in the treatment of hematological malignancies, they are much less effective as single agents in the treatment of solid tumors, such as ovarian cancer.

  • In addition to inducing apoptosis in solid cancer cells, HDAC inhibitors induce IκB-kinase (IKK)-dependent expression of pro-inflammatory chemokines, such as interleukin-8 (CXCL8).

  • Suppression of the IKK-dependent CXCL8 expression induced by HDAC inhibition increases the pro-apoptotic and anti-proliferative effect of HDAC inhibitors in ovarian cancer cells, indicating that anti-inflammatory agents targeting the IKK activity may increase effectiveness of HDAC inhibitors in ovarian cancer and other solid cancers characterized by the increased CXCL8 expression.

Acknowledgments

The work in the Vancurova’s lab is supported by St. John’s University, and by NIH CA202775 grant.

GLOSSARY

Interleukin-8 (CXCL8)

Pro-inflammatory and pro-angiogenic chemokine originally discovered as a neutrophil chemoattractant; has an important regulatory role in promoting survival, proliferation, and migration of solid cancer cells.

Histone deacetylases (HDACs)

Epigenetic modulators that remove acetyl groups from histone and non-histone proteins.

Histone deacetylase inhibitors (HDACi)

Chemical compounds that inhibit histone deacetylases and have a significant anti-cancer potential.

IκB kinase (IKK)

A central enzymatic complex that is a part of the NFκB signaling; in addition to phosphorylating IκBα and p65 NFκB, IKK can phosphorylate other proteins involved in the transcriptional regulation.

Nuclear Factor κB (NFκB)

Transcription factor regulating expression of genes involved in a broad range of biological processes including immune responses, inflammation, stress responses, lymphoid organogenesis, and cell survival and proliferation.

Footnotes

Publisher's Disclaimer: This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final citable form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.

References

  • 1.West AC, Johnstone RW. New and emerging HDAC inhibitors for cancer treatment. J Clin Invest. 2014;124:30–39. doi: 10.1172/JCI69738. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Bose P, et al. Histone deacetylase inhibitor (HDACI) mechanisms of action: emerging insights. Pharmacol Ther. 2014;143:323–336. doi: 10.1016/j.pharmthera.2014.04.004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Li Y, Seto E. HDACs and HDAC Inhibitors in Cancer Development and Therapy. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med. 2016 doi: 10.1101/cshperspect.a026831. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Noack K, et al. Analysis of the interplay between all-trans retinoic acid and histone deacetylase inhibitors in leukemic cells. Arch Toxicol. 2017;91:2191–2208. doi: 10.1007/s00204-016-1878-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Wagner T, et al. Histone deacetylase 2 controls p53 and is a critical factor in tumorigenesis. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2014;1846:524–538. doi: 10.1016/j.bbcan.2014.07.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Schäfer C, et al. Class I histone deacetylases regulate p53/NF-κB crosstalk in cancer cells. Cell Signal. 2017;29:218–225. doi: 10.1016/j.cellsig.2016.11.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Nikolova T, et al. Interstrand Crosslink Repair as a Target for HDAC Inhibition. Trends Pharmacol Sci. 2017;38:822–836. doi: 10.1016/j.tips.2017.05.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Wieczorek M, et al. Acetylation modulates the STAT signaling code. Cytokine Growth Factor Rev. 2012;23:293–305. doi: 10.1016/j.cytogfr.2012.06.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Millard CJ, et al. Targeting Class I Histone Deacetylases in a “Complex” Environment. Trends Pharmacol Sci. 2017;38:363–377. doi: 10.1016/j.tips.2016.12.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Mariadason JM, et al. Genetic reprogramming in pathways of colonic cell maturation induced by short chain fatty acids: comparison with trichostatin A, sulindac, and curcumin and implications for chemoprevention of colon cancer. Cancer Res. 2000;60:4561–4572. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Mitsiades CS, et al. Transcriptional signature of histone deacetylase inhibition in multiple myeloma: biological and clinical implications. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2004;101:540–545. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2536759100. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Peart MJ, et al. Identification and functional significance of genes regulated by structurally different histone deacetylase inhibitors. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2005;102:3697–3702. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0500369102. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Woan KV, et al. Modulation of antigen-presenting cells by HDAC inhibitors: implications in autoimmunity and cancer. Immunol Cell Biol. 2012;90:55–65. doi: 10.1038/icb.2011.96. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Magner WJ, et al. Activation of MHC class I, II, and CD40 gene expression by histone deacetylase inhibitors. J Immunol. 2000;165:7017–7024. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.165.12.7017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Woods DM, et al. The antimelanoma activity of the histone deacetylase inhibitor panobinostat (LBH589) is mediated by direct tumor cytotoxicity and increased tumor immunogenicity. Melanoma Res. 2013;23:341–348. doi: 10.1097/CMR.0b013e328364c0ed. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Zheng H, et al. HDAC inhibitors enhance T-cell chemokine expression and augment response to PD-1 immunotherapy in lung adenocarcinoma. Clin Cancer Res. 2016;22:4119–4132. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-15-2584. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Tao R, et al. Deacetylase inhibition promotes the generation and function of regulatory T cells. Nat Med. 2007;13:1299–1307. doi: 10.1038/nm1652. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Huang J, et al. Histone/protein deacetylase 11 targeting promotes Foxp3+ Treg function. Sci Rep. 2017 doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-09211-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Kwon SH, et al. Apicidin, a histone deacetylase inhibitor, induces apoptosis and Fas/Fas ligand expression in human acute promyelocytic leukemia cells. J Biol Chem. 2002;277:2073–2080. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M106699200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Rosato RR, et al. The histone deacetylase inhibitor MS-275 promotes differentiation or apoptosis in human leukemia cells through a process regulated by generation of reactive oxygen species and induction of p21CIP1/WAF1. Cancer Res. 2003;63:3637–3645. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Mitsiades N, et al. Molecular sequelae of histone deacetylase inhibition in human malignant B cells. Blood. 2003;101:4055–4062. doi: 10.1182/blood-2002-11-3514. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Haery L, et al. Histone acetyltransferases and histone deacetylases in B- and T-cell development, physiology and malignancy. Genes Cancer. 2015;6:184–213. doi: 10.18632/genesandcancer.65. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Mayo MW, et al. Ineffectiveness of histone deacetylase inhibitors to induce apoptosis involves the transcriptional activation of NFκB through the Akt pathway. J Biol Chem. 2003;278:18980–18989. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M211695200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Rundall BK, et al. Combined histone deacetylase and NFκB inhibition sensitizes non-small cell lung cancer to cell death. Surgery. 2004;136:416–425. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2004.05.018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Grassadonia A, et al. Role of Hydroxamate-Based Histone Deacetylase Inhibitors (Hb-HDACIs) in the Treatment of Solid Malignancies. Cancers (Basel) 2013;5:919–942. doi: 10.3390/cancers5030919. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Gatla HR, et al. Histone Deacetylase (HDAC) Inhibition Induces IκB Kinase (IKK)-dependent Interleukin-8/CXCL8 Expression in Ovarian Cancer Cells. J Biol Chem. 2017;292:5043–5054. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M116.771014. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Gatla HR, et al. Epigenetic regulation of interleukin-8 expression by class I HDAC and CBP in ovarian cancer cells. Oncotarget. 2017;8:70798–70810. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.19990. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Villagra A, et al. The histone deacetylase HDAC11 regulates the expression of interleukin 10 and immune tolerance. Nature Immunol. 2009;10:92–100. doi: 10.1038/ni.1673. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Cheng F, et al. Divergent roles of histone deacetylase 6 (HDAC6) and histone deacetylase 11 (HDAC11) on the transcriptional regulation of IL10 in antigen presenting cells. Mol Immunol. 2014;60:44–53. doi: 10.1016/j.molimm.2014.02.019. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Leus NG, et al. HDAC1-3 inhibitor MS-275 enhances IL10 expression in RAW264.7 macrophages and reduces cigarette smoke-induced airway inflammation in mice. Sci Rep. 2017 doi: 10.1038/srep45047. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Skultetyova L, et al. Human histone deacetylase 6 shows strong preference for tubulin dimers over assembled microtubules. Sci Rep. 2017 doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-11739-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Leoni F, et al. The antitumor histone deacetylase inhibitor suberoylanilide hydroxamic acid exhibits antiinflammatory properties via suppression of cytokines. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2002;99:2995–3000. doi: 10.1073/pnas.052702999. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Leoni F, et al. The histone deacetylase inhibitor ITF2357 reduces production of pro-inflammatory cytokines in vitro and systemic inflammation in vivo. Mol Med. 2005;11:1–15. doi: 10.2119/2006-00005.Dinarello. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Choi Y, et al. Histone deacetylase inhibitor KBH-A42 inhibits cytokine production in RAW 264.7 macrophage cells and in vivo endotoxemia model. Exp Mol Med. 2008;40:574–581. doi: 10.3858/emm.2008.40.5.574. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Grabiec AM, et al. Histone deacetylase inhibitors suppress inflammatory activation of rheumatoid arthritis patient synovial macrophages and tissue. J Immunol. 2010;184:2718–2728. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.0901467. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Song W, et al. HDAC inhibition by LBH589 affects the phenotype and function of human myeloid dendritic cells. Leukemia. 2011;25:161–168. doi: 10.1038/leu.2010.244. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; a Leus NG, et al. HDAC 3-selective inhibitor RGFP966 demonstrates anti-inflammatory properties in RAW 264.7 macrophages and mouse precision-cut lung slices by attenuating NF-κB p65 transcriptional activity. Biochem Pharmacol. 2016;108:58–74. doi: 10.1016/j.bcp.2016.03.010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Ashburner BP, et al. The p65 (RelA) subunit of NFκB interacts with the histone deacetylase (HDAC) corepressors HDAC1 and HDAC2 to negatively regulate gene expression. Mol Cell Biol. 2001;21:7065–7077. doi: 10.1128/MCB.21.20.7065-7077.2001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Adam E, et al. Potentiation of TNF-induced NFκB activation by deacetylase inhibitors is associated with a delayed cytoplasmic reappearance of IκBα. Mol Cell Biol. 2003;23:6200–6209. doi: 10.1128/MCB.23.17.6200-6209.2003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Kim YK, et al. Activation of NFκB by HDAC inhibitor apicidin through Sp1-dependent de novo protein synthesis: its implication for resistance to apoptosis. Cell Death Differ. 2006;13:2033–2041. doi: 10.1038/sj.cdd.4401915. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Baird AM, et al. Epigenetics underpinning the regulation of the CXC (ELR+) chemokines in non-small cell lung cancer. PLoS One. 2011 doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0014593. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Chavey C, et al. Interleukin-8 expression is regulated by histone deacetylases through the NFκB pathway in breast cancer. Mol Pharmacol. 2008;74:1359–1366. doi: 10.1124/mol.108.047332. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Balkwill F. Cancer and the chemokine network. Nat Rev Cancer. 2004;4:540–550. doi: 10.1038/nrc1388. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Waugh DJ, Wilson C. The interleukin-8 pathway in cancer. Clin Cancer Res. 2008;14:6735–6741. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-07-4843. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Lazennec G, Richmond A. Chemokines and chemokine receptors: new insights into cancer-related inflammation. Trends Mol Med. 2010;16:133–144. doi: 10.1016/j.molmed.2010.01.003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Liu Q, et al. The CXCL8-CXCR1/2 pathways in cancer. Cytokine Growth Factor Rev. 2016;31:61–71. doi: 10.1016/j.cytogfr.2016.08.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Xu L, Fidler IJ. Interleukin 8: an autocrine growth factor for human ovarian cancer. Oncol Res. 2001;12:97–106. doi: 10.3727/096504001108747567. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Merritt WM, et al. Effect of interleukin-8 gene silencing with liposome-encapsulated small interfering RNA on ovarian cancer cell growth. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2008;100:359–372. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djn024. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.De Larco JE, et al. Atypical methylation of the interleukin-8 gene correlates strongly with the metastatic potential of breast carcinoma cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2003;100:13988–13993. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2335921100. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Freund A, et al. Mechanisms underlying differential expression of interleukin-8 in breast cancer cells. Oncogene. 2004;23:6105–6114. doi: 10.1038/sj.onc.1207815. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Waugh DJ, et al. Multi-faceted roles for CXC-chemokines in prostate cancer progression. Front Biosci. 2008;13:4595–4604. doi: 10.2741/3025. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Pazolli E, et al. Chromatin remodeling underlies the senescence-associated secretory phenotype of tumor stromal fibroblasts that supports cancer progression. Cancer Res. 2012;72:2251–2261. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-11-3386. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Nguyen AH, et al. Histone deacetylase inhibitors provoke a tumor supportive phenotype in pancreatic cancer associated fibroblasts. Oncotarget. 2017;8:19074–19088. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.13572. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Wu D, et al. NF-κB Expression and Outcomes in Solid Tumors: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Medicine (Baltimore) 2015 doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000001687. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.DiDonato JA, et al. NF-κB and the link between inflammation and cancer. Immunol Rev. 2012;246:379–400. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-065X.2012.01099.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Durand JK, Baldwin AS. IKK and NF-κB for Therapy. Adv Protein Chem Struct Biol. 2017;107:77–115. doi: 10.1016/bs.apcsb.2016.11.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Liu F, et al. IKK biology. Immunol Rev. 2012;246:239–253. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-065X.2012.01107.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Hayden MS, Ghosh S. NFκB, the first quarter-century: remarkable progress and outstanding questions. Genes Dev. 2012;26:203–234. doi: 10.1101/gad.183434.111. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Chen LF, et al. Duration of nuclear NFκB action regulated by reversible acetylation. Science. 2001;293:1653–1657. doi: 10.1126/science.1062374. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Chen L, et al. Acetylation of RelA at discrete sites regulates distinct nuclear functions of NF-κB. EMBO J. 2002;21:6539–6548. doi: 10.1093/emboj/cdf660. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Chen LF, et al. NF-κB RelA phosphorylation regulates RelA acetylation. Mol Cell Biol. 2005;25:7966–7975. doi: 10.1128/MCB.25.18.7966-7975.2005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Huang B, et al. Posttranslational modifications of NF-κB: another layer of regulation for NF-κB signaling pathway. Cell Signal. 2010;22:1282–1290. doi: 10.1016/j.cellsig.2010.03.017. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Natoli G. NF-κB and chromatin: ten years on the path from basic mechanisms to candidate drugs. Immunol Rev. 2012;246:183–192. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-065X.2012.01103.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Krämer OH, et al. SIAH proteins: critical roles in leukemogenesis. Leukemia. 2013;27:792–802. doi: 10.1038/leu.2012.284. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Place RF, et al. HDAC inhibition prevents NFκB activation by suppressing proteasome activity: down-regulation of proteasome subunit expression stabilizes IκBα. Biochem Pharmacol. 2005;70:394–406. doi: 10.1016/j.bcp.2005.04.030. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Dai Y, et al. Blockade of histone deacetylase inhibitor-induced RelA/p65 acetylation and NFκB activation potentiates apoptosis in leukemia cells through a process mediated by oxidative damage, XIAP downregulation, and c-Jun N-terminal kinase 1 activation. Mol Cell Biol. 2005;25:5429–5444. doi: 10.1128/MCB.25.13.5429-5444.2005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Dai Y, et al. Disruption of IκB kinase (IKK)-mediated RelA serine 536 phosphorylation sensitizes human multiple myeloma cells to histone deacetylase (HDAC) inhibitors. J Biol Chem. 2011;286:34036–34050. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M111.284216. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Kunsch C, Rosen CA. NFκB subunit-specific regulation of the interleukin-8 promoter. Mol Cell Biol. 1993;13:6137–6146. doi: 10.1128/mcb.13.10.6137. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Singha B, et al. Proteasome inhibition increases recruitment of IκB kinase β (IKKβ), S536P-p65, and transcription factor EGR1 to interleukin-8 (IL-8) promoter, resulting in increased IL-8 production in ovarian cancer cells. J Biol Chem. 2014;289:2687–2700. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M113.502641. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Kiernan R, et al. Post-activation turn-off of NFκB-dependent transcription is regulated by acetylation of p65. J Biol Chem. 2003;278:2758–2766. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M209572200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Buerki C, et al. Functional relevance of novel p300-mediated lysine 314 and 315 acetylation of RelA/p65. Nucleic Acids Res. 2008;36:1665–1680. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkn003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Rothgiesser KM, et al. Acetylation of p65 at lysine 314 is important for late NFκB-dependent gene expression. BMC Genomics. 2010 doi: 10.1186/1471-2164-11-22. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Zhong H, et al. The phosphorylation status of nuclear NFκB determines its association with CBP/p300 or HDAC-1. Mol Cell. 2002;9:625–636. doi: 10.1016/s1097-2765(02)00477-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Viatour P, et al. Cytoplasmic IκBα increases NFκB-independent transcription through binding to histone deacetylase (HDAC) 1 and HDAC3. J Biol Chem. 2003;278:46541–46548. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M306381200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Hoberg JE, et al. IκB kinase alpha-mediated derepression of SMRT potentiates acetylation of RelA/p65 by p300. Mol Cell Biol. 2006;26:457–471. doi: 10.1128/MCB.26.2.457-471.2006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Liu Y, et al. Breast cancer metastasis suppressor 1 functions as a corepressor by enhancing histone deacetylase 1-mediated deacetylation of RelA/p65 and promoting apoptosis. Mol Cell Biol. 2006;26:8683–8696. doi: 10.1128/MCB.00940-06. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Ziesché E, et al. The coactivator role of histone deacetylase 3 in IL-1-signaling involves deacetylation of p65 NF-κB. Nucleic Acids Res. 2013;41:90–109. doi: 10.1093/nar/gks916. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Wagner T, et al. Sumoylation of HDAC2 promotes NF-κB-dependent gene expression. Oncotarget. 2015;6:7123–7135. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.3344. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78.Calao M, et al. A pervasive role of histone acetyltransferases and deacetylases in an NFκB-signaling code. Trends Biochem Sci. 2008;33:339–349. doi: 10.1016/j.tibs.2008.04.015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79.Yu Z, et al. Histone deacetylases augment cytokine induction of the iNOS gene. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2002;13:2009–2017. doi: 10.1097/01.asn.0000024253.59665.f1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80.Krämer OH, et al. Acetylation of Stat1 modulates NF-κB activity. Genes Dev. 2006;20:473–485. doi: 10.1101/gad.364306. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 81.Krämer OH, et al. A phosphorylation-acetylation switch regulates STAT1 signaling. Genes Dev. 2009;23:223–235. doi: 10.1101/gad.479209. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 82.Kumar P, et al. Inhibition of HDAC enhances STAT acetylation, blocks NF-κB, and suppresses the renal inflammation and fibrosis in Npr1 haplotype male mice. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol. 2017;313:F781–F795. doi: 10.1152/ajprenal.00166.2017. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 83.Stronach EA, et al. HDAC4-regulated STAT1 activation mediates platinum resistance in ovarian cancer. Cancer Res. 2011;71:4412–4422. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-10-4111. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 84.Schneider G, et al. Cross talk between stimulated NFκB and the tumor suppressor p53. Oncogene. 2010;29:2795–2806. doi: 10.1038/onc.2010.46. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 85.Tang Z, et al. HDAC1 triggers the proliferation and migration of breast cancer cells via upregulation of interleukin-8. Biol Chem. 2017;398:1347–1356. doi: 10.1515/hsz-2017-0155. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 86.Jamaluddin M, et al. Respiratory syncytial virus-inducible BCL-3 expression antagonizes the STAT/IRF and NFκB signaling pathways by inducing histone deacetylase 1 recruitment to the interleukin-8 promoter. J Virol. 2005;79:15302–15313. doi: 10.1128/JVI.79.24.15302-15313.2005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 87.Sonnemann J, et al. Histone deacetylase inhibitors and aspirin interact synergistically to induce cell death in ovarian cancer cells. Oncol Rep. 2008;20:219–224. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 88.Yin MJ, et al. The anti-inflammatory agents aspirin and salicylate inhibit the activity of IκB kinase-β. Nature. 1998;396:77–80. doi: 10.1038/23948. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 89.Duan J, et al. NFκB p65 small interfering RNA or proteasome inhibitor bortezomib sensitizes head and neck squamous cell carcinomas to classic histone deacetylase inhibitors and novel histone deacetylase inhibitor PXD101. Mol Cancer Ther. 2007;6:37–50. doi: 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-05-0285. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 90.Zheng L, et al. Simultaneous NF-κB inhibition and E-cadherin upregulation mediate mutually synergistic anticancer activity of celastrol and SAHA in vitro and in vivo. Int J Cancer. 2014;135:1721–1732. doi: 10.1002/ijc.28810. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 91.Karthik S, et al. Blocking NF-κB sensitizes non-small cell lung cancer cells to histone deacetylase inhibitor induced extrinsic apoptosis through generation of reactive oxygen species. Biomed Pharmacother. 2015;69:337–344. doi: 10.1016/j.biopha.2014.12.023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 92.Marquardt JU, et al. Curcumin effectively inhibits oncogenic NF-κB signaling and restrains stemness features in liver cancer. J Hepatol. 2015;63:661–669. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2015.04.018. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 93.Pozdeyev N, et al. Targeting the NF-κB Pathway as a Combination Therapy for Advanced Thyroid Cancer. PLoS One doi. 2015;10(8):e0134901. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0134901. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 94.Steele CW, et al. CXCR2 Inhibition Profoundly Suppresses Metastases and Augments Immunotherapy in Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma. Cancer Cell. 2016;29:832–845. doi: 10.1016/j.ccell.2016.04.014. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 95.Morton JP, Sansom OJ. CXCR2 inhibition in pancreatic cancer: opportunities for immunotherapy? Immunotherapy. 2017;9:9–12. doi: 10.2217/imt-2016-0115. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 96.Dai Y, et al. The NFκB inhibitor parthenolide interacts with histone deacetylase inhibitors to induce MKK7/JNK1-dependent apoptosis in human acute myeloid leukaemia cells. Br J Haematol. 2010;151:70–83. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2141.2010.08319.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 97.Deng C, et al. The novel IKK2 inhibitor LY2409881 potently synergizes with histone deacetylase inhibitors in preclinical models of lymphoma through the downregulation of NF-κB. Clin Cancer Res. 2015;21:134–145. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-14-0384. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 98.Jobin C, et al. Curcumin blocks cytokine-mediated NFκB activation and proinflammatory gene expression by inhibiting inhibitory factor IκB kinase activity. J Immunol. 1999;163:3474–3483. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 99.Vancurova I, et al. HDAC/IKK inhibition therapies in solid tumors. Oncotarget. 2017;8:34030–34031. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.17512. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES