Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 Sep 1.
Published in final edited form as: Br J Sports Med. 2017 Jul 22;52(18):1179–1190. doi: 10.1136/bjsports-2016-096551

Table 1.

Study Characteristics

First Author Year Study Design Sample Size (Control Sample Size) Age in years (Controls age in years) Time to return to sport in days (Controls return to sport time)
Anzalone 91 2017 Prospective cohort study 167 15 ± 2 19.9 ± 13.4
Baker 92 2016 Retrospective cohort study 147 15.4 ± 1.5 16.5
Black 64 2017 Retrospective chart review 759 19.34 ± 1.81 Median = 11
Broglio 93 2016 Prospective cohort study 24 (21) 16.7 ± 2.5 (17.1 ± 2.9) 26.2 ± 42.8
Brooks 51 2016 Retrospective cohort study 75 (182) 19.3 ± 1.3 (19.9 ± 1.3) 21.0
Brown 90 2014 Prospective cohort study 335 15 ± 2.6 43 ± 53
Buckley 47 2015 Prospective cohort study 25 (25) 19.8 ± 1.2 (19.4 ± 1.3) 6.8 ± 4.6 (7.2 ± 5.8)
Clausen 41 2016 Prospective experimental study 6 (13) 23 ± 6 (21 ± 3) Not mentioned
Collins 48 2006 Prospective cohort study 1173 (968)* 16.3 ± 1.1 (15.9 ± 1.3) 10.9 (13.0)
Corwin 89 2015 Retrospective cohort study 200 (47) 14 (range= 7–18) 106 (29)
Crowe 42 2016 Prospective cohort study 10 14.6 (range= 11–17) 30 (except 1 case)
Darling 35 2014 Retrospective chart review 117 15.5 ± 1.6 16 ± 15
Elbin 53 2016 Prospective cohort study 35 (34) 15.35 ± 1.73 (15.61 ± 1.65) 44.4 ± 36.0 (22.0 ± 18.7)
Field 94 2003 Case control study HS: 19 (20), college: 35 (18) HS= 15.9 (range= 14–18), college= 19.9 (range= 17 – 25) HS did not recover by 7, college recovered by 3
Gill 54 2017 Prospective cohort study 46 (37) 19.1 ± 1.18 (18.7 ± 0.67) 21.68 ± 42.99
Henry 37 2015 Prospective cohort study 66 16.5 ± 1.9 21 to 28
Hutchison 55 2016 Prospective cohort study 26 (26) 21 ± 2.5 34.7 ± 37.7
Iverson 95 2007 Prospective cohort study 114 (55 simple, 59 complex) 16.2 ± 1.2 (13 – 16) “Simple”= 4.5 ± 2.1, “Complex”= 18.9 ± 8.6
Kontos 49 2013 Prospective cohort study 138 15.96 ± 1.18 63% < 7 days, 37% >21
Kriz 57 2016 Prospective cohort study 145 15.4 ± 1.5 44.5 ± 48.7
Lau 32 2011 Prospective cohort study 107 16.02 ± 1.22 13.26 ± 9.05
Lax 96 2015 Prospective cohort study 25 11.8 ± 1.44 20.13 ± 31.2
Lovell 97 2003 Case control study 64 (24) Not mentioned Return to sport for most: 4 – 7
Lovell 59 2007 Case control Study 28 (13) 16.6 ± 4 (18.3 ± 3.5) 33.3 ± 33.8
Lynall 60 2016 Retrospective cohort study 34 18.38 ± 0.78 Not mentioned
Maerlender 40 2015 Randomized control trial 13 (15) Not mentioned Median = 15 (median = 13)
Makdissi 61 2010 Prospective cohort study 78 Median= 22 4.8
Maugans 81 2012 Prospective cohort study 12 (12) 13.4 (13.4) 14
Mautner 44 2015 Case control study 70 (70) 15.5 (15.7) 16.5 (13.5)
McClincy 62 2006 Prospective cohort study 104 16.11 ± 2.22 63% recovered by 14 days
McDevit 98 2015 Prospective cohort study 87 19.47 ± 6.02 55.73 ± 85.79
Mcgrath 45 2013 Retrospective cohort study 54 15.46 ± 1.48 13.33 ± 8.87
Meehan 50 2013 Prospective cohort study 182 15 ± 3.04 73.6% recovered in ≤28
Miller 99 2016 Case control study 294
Morgan 100 2015 Case control study 40 (80) 14.9 ± 2.1 (14.8 ± 2.0) Control recovered ≤3 weeks
Murugavel 56 2014 Prospective cohort study 21 (21) 20.19 ± 1.03 (19.9 ± 1.67) All were recovered 2 months post-injury
Nelson 65 2016 Prospective cohort study HS = 405 (89)
College = 213 (61)
HS = 16.04 ± 0.99 (16.24 ± 0.73)
College = 19.72 ± 1.47 (19.27 ± 1.46)
Resolved by 7 days
Newsome 66 2016 Prospective cohort study 13 (13) 16± 1.1 (16.4 ± 1.3) All recovered by day 30
Ono 101 2016 Prospective cohort study 176 range= 10–18 Not mentioned
Ransom 63 2015 Cross-sectional study 349 13.72 (range= 5 – 18) 68.8% recovered ≤28
Slobounov 84 2007 Prospective cohort study 160 Male= 20.95, female= 21.42 All recovered by day 10
Slobounov 82 2012 Prospective cohort study 49 range= 18 – 25 10
Terwilliger 67 2016 Case control study 21 (21) 14.9 ± 0.89 (14.9 ± 0.89) Not mentioned

Level of Evidence details: Level 2: evidence from one well-designed randomized control trial, Level 3: well-designed controlled trial without randomization, Level 4: well-designed case-control or cohort study, Level 6: single descriptive qualitative study.

*

= Athlete exposure from 2002 to 2004