Table 4.
Statistics table
| Data structure | Type of test | Power | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Figure 1B2 | Not assumed * | KW tests with Bonferroni correction ** | TII vs TIb, p = 6.60 × 10−15
TII vs TIs, p = 6.31 × 10−18 |
| Figure 1B3 | Not assumed | KW tests with Bonferroni correction | TII vs TIs, p = 6.31 × 10−8
TIs vs TIb, p = 3.40 × 10−13 |
| Figure 1B4 | Not assumed | KW tests with Bonferroni correction | TII vs TIb, p = 5.90 × 10−13
TIs vs TIb, p = 1.41 × 10−14 |
| Figure 2C | Not assumed | KW tests with Bonferroni correction | 10 Hz, TII vs TIb, p = 0.000835 10 Hz, TII vs TIs, p = 3.08 × 10−5 20 Hz, TII vs TIb, p = 0.000835 20 Hz, TIs vs TIb, p = 0.00706 40 Hz, TII vs TIb, p = 0.000835 40 Hz, TIs vs TIb, p = 0.00706 |
| Figure 2D | Not assumed | KW tests with Bonferroni correction | 2 Hz, TII vs TIb, p = 0.0628 10 Hz, TIs vs TIb, p = 0.0489 10 Hz, TII vs TIb, p = 0.0271 20 Hz, TIs vs TIb, p = 0.0489 40 Hz, TIs vs TII, p = 0.0628 |
| Figure 4B | Not assumed | KW tests with Bonferroni correction | TIs, eag Sh vs control, p = 2.78 × 10−5
TIs, 4-AP vs control, p = 0.0177 TII, TEA vs control, p = 0.00942 TII, eag Sh vs control, p = 0.0302 |
| Figure 4D | Not assumed | KW tests with Bonferroni correction | TII, TEA vs control, p = 0.131 TIs, 4-AP vs control, p = 0.0177 TIs, Sh vs control, p = 0.00228 TIs, eag Sh vs control, p = 4.29 × 10−5 |
| Figure 10B | Not assumed | KW tests with Bonferroni correction | TII, 2 Hz, bss1 vs control, p = 0.0337 TII, 10 Hz, para vs control, p = 0.0441 TII, 20 Hz, para vs control, p = 0.0335 |
| Figure 13B | Normal | t tests | TIb, 80 Hz, pH 8.8 vs pH 7.2, p = 0.00665 TIs, 40 Hz, pH 8.8 vs pH 7.2, p = 0.00222 TIs, 80 Hz, pH 8.8 vs pH 7.2, p = 0.000524 TII, 10 Hz, pH 8.8 vs pH 7.2, p = 0.000585 TII, 20 Hz, pH 8.8 vs pH 7.2, p = 0.0283 TII, 40 Hz, pH 8.8 vs pH 7.2, p = 0.0232 |
| Figure 13C | Normal | t tests | TIb, 80 Hz, pH 8.8 vs pH 7.2, p = 0.00665 TIs, 40 Hz, pH 8.8 vs pH 7.2, p = 0.0463 |
| Figure 13D | Normal | t tests | TIb, 40 Hz, pH 8.8 vs pH 7.2, p = 0.00665 TII, 10 Hz, pH 8.8 vs pH 7.2, p = 0.0358 |
| Figure 13E | Normal | ANOVA and Fisher’s LSD tests | Across all boutons and frequencies, Group a vs group b and c, p < 0.001 Group b vs group c, p < 0.05 |
| Figure 14D | Not assumed | KW tests with Bonferroni correction | TIb, 20 Hz, 60 vs 20 min, p = 0.013 TIb, 40 Hz, 60 vs 20 min, p = 8.78 × 10−9 TIb, 40 Hz, 60 min vs NoDNP, p = 9.11 × 10−9 TIs, 10 Hz, 60 vs 20 min, p = 7.54 × 10−7 TIs, 20 Hz, 60 min vs NoDNP, p = 3.12 × 10−8 TIs, 20 Hz, 60 vs 20 min, p = 0.00206 TIs, 40 Hz, 60 min vs NoDNP, p = 2.43 × 10−8 TIs, 40 Hz, 60 vs 20 min, p = 6.14 × 10−8 TII, 10 Hz, 20 min vs NoDNP, p = 0.0126 TII, 20 Hz, 20 min vs NoDNP, p = 1.34 × 10−7 TII, 40 Hz, 20 min vs NoDNP, p = 2.61 × 10−10 |
| Figure 14E | Not assumed | KW tests with Bonferroni correction | TIb, 40 Hz, 60 min vs NoDNP, p = 7.24 × 10−5
TIb, 40 Hz, 60 vs 20 min, p = 4.39 × 10−4 TIs, 20 Hz, 60 min vs NoDNP, p = 0.00141 TIs, 40 Hz, 60 min vs NoDNP, p = 0.000198 TII, 20 Hz, 20 min vs NoDNP, p = 7.23 × 10−7 TII, 40 Hz, 20 min vs NoDNP, p = 7.86 × 10−8 |
| Figure 14F | Not assumed | KW tests with Bonferroni correction | TIb, 10 Hz, 60 min vs NoDNP, p = 2.66 × 10−4
TIb, 10 Hz, 60 vs 20 min, p = 8.05 × 10−5 TIb, 20 Hz, 60 vs 20 min, p = 2.02 × 10−8 TIb, 20 Hz, 60 min vs NoDNP, p = 1.65 × 10−8 TIb, 20 Hz, 20 min vs NoDNP, p = 2.23 × 10−9 TIb, 40 Hz, 60 vs 20 min, p = 8.88 × 10−4 TIb, 40 Hz, 60 min vs NoDNP, p = 9.80 × 10−10 TIb, 40 Hz, 20 min vs NoDNP, p = 1.27 × 10−9 TIs, 10 Hz, 60 min vs NoDNP, p = 4.15 × 10−5 TIs, 10 Hz, 20 min vs NoDNP, p = 8.53 × 10−6 TIs, 20 Hz, 60 min vs NoDNP, p = 0.000114 TIs, 20 Hz, 20 min vs NoDNP, p = 0.00312 TII, 40 Hz, 20 min vs NoDNP, p = 1.83 × 10−11 |
| Figure 15 | Normal | t tests with Bonferroni correction | TIb vs TIs, p = 0.044 TIb vs TII, p = 3.73 × 10−13 TIs vs TII, p = 9.46 × 10−6 |
*
KW tests do not assume that the data structure is normal.
**
All p values involving Bonferroni correction have been multiplied with the number of comparisons within the same group of data, whereas the significance levels are set at 0.05, 0.01, and 0.001 for clarity of display in the figures.