Skip to main content
. 2017 Oct 24;318(16):1569–1580. doi: 10.1001/jama.2017.7219

Table 3. Secondary End Points by Treatment Group.

End Point No./Total No. (%) Unadjusted Risk Difference (95% CI), % Adjusted Odds Ratio (95% CI)a P Value
Conventional Laparoscopic Surgery Robotic-Assisted Laparoscopic Surgery
CRM+b 14/224 (6.3) 12/235 (5.1) 1.2 (−3.1 to 5.4) 0.78 (0.35 to 1.76) .56
Mesorectal area = mesorectal plane 173/223 (77.6) 178/233 (76.4) 1.2 (−6.5 to 8.9) 0.94 (0.56 to 1.57) .14
Intraoperative complication 34/230 (14.8) 36/236 (15.3) −0.5 (−6.0 to 7.0) 1.02 (0.60 to 1.74) .94
Postoperative complication within 30 d of operation 73/230 (31.7) 78/236 (33.1) −1.3 (−9.8 to 7.2) 1.04 (0.69 to 1.58) .84
Postoperative complication >30 d and ≤6 mo after operation 38/230 (16.5) 34/236 (14.4) 2.1 (−4.5 to 8.7) 0.72 (0.41 to 1.26) .25
Mortality within 30 d of operationc 2/230 (0.9) 2/236 (0.8) 0.02 (−1.7 to 1.7) NA NA

Abbreviations: CRM+, circumferential resection margin positivity; NA, not applicable.

a

Adjusted for sex, body mass index class, preoperative radiotherapy, intended procedure, and operating surgeon.

b

Defined as tumor cells within 1 mm of the circumferential resection margin on histological analysis.

c

Adjusted analysis was not performed for mortality within 30 days of operation due to the small number of events.