Table 1.
The relative amount of different repeat classes in the reads’ set estimated by comparison with reads mapping (Bowtie2)
| ChrmC % | wgHTS % | Reference genome % | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ERV | All | 8.8 | 12.7 | 12.3 | |
| ERV3 | 3.2 | 5.9 | 6.1 | ||
| ERV2 | All | 5.1 | 5.9 | 5 | |
| IAP | 2.2 | 0.8 | 1 | ||
| ERV1 | 0.5 | 0.9 | 1.2 | ||
| LINE | 10.9 | 17.1 | 19.9 | ||
| SINE | 2.1 | 5.2 | 8.3 | ||
| DNA transposons | 0.6 | 1.2 | 1.2 | ||
| TR | MaSat | 66.2 | 13.0 | * | |
| MiSat | 4.4 | 0.6 | * | ||
| Other | 0.9 | 0.9 | * | ||
| Tel** | 0.1 | 0.1< | * | ||
| All | 93.7 | 50.8 | – | ||
* - poorly annotated in the reference genome, content < 0,1%; ** - telomeres, the actual amount in wgHTS is 0.04%; the figures up to the second decimal place shown in the table