Skip to main content
. 2018 Jan 23;115(6):1376–1381. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1715997115

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1.

The PCT of CaV1.2 is crucial for the interaction with STAC3. (A–D, Upper) Cartoons showing the cytosolic domains of CaV1.2 (blue) substituted with the corresponding regions of CaV2.1 (N terminus, I-II loop, III-IV loop, PCT; red) or of the Musca channel (II-III loop; black). The CaV1.2 triad targeting sequence (yellow) is maintained in all chimeras. (Lower, Right) Representative immunofluorescence images of dysgenic myotubes expressing the indicated chimeric CaV1.2 channel and STAC3-GFP. (Scale bars, 10 μm.) (Lower, Right) Color overlay of CaVβ1a (red) and STAC3-GFP staining (green); 4× magnification of regions indicated by blue rectangle. (Scale bars, 5 μm.) The numbers indicate the percentage of myotubes in which STAC3-GFP was coclustered with the channel chimera (n = 3, n = 90). (A) STAC3-GFP showed triad targeting in the majority of the dysgenic myotubes expressing CaV1.2, CaV1.2-NTA or CaV1.2-I-IIA. CaV1.2-II-IIIM, and CaV1.2-III-IVA failed to localize in the triads of the myotubes, precluding analysis of STAC3-GFP association (n.d.). STAC3-GFP colocalized also with CaV1.2-Δ1800 (B), but not in myotubes expressing CaV1.2-PCTA (C), indicating that the PCT of CaV1.2 is crucial for the interaction with STAC proteins. (D) C-terminal chimera A was not targeted to the triads, preventing analysis of association of STAC3-GFP. Chimera B was targeted to the triads and STAC3-GFP colocalized in clusters, similarly to the control CaV1.2-Δ1800. Chimera C was targeted to the triads; however, it failed to recruit STAC3-GFP to the channel complex, indicating that amino acids 1,641–1,668 are crucial for the STAC interaction.