. 2017 Apr 13;18(1):127–137. doi: 10.1037/emo0000306

Table 1. WM Performance across Depressive State and Condition.

	Experiment 1		Experiment 2		Experiment 3
	<BDI-II cutoff n = 83	>BDI-II cutoff n = 40	Never depressed n = 14	MDD n = 13	Never depressed n = 19	Current MDD n = 25	Remitted MDD n = 24
Note. Neutral = proportion of words recalled correctly in the context of neutral sentences; depressogenic = proportion of words recalled correctly in the context of depressogenic sentences; < BDI-II cutoff = individuals scoring 14 or lower on the BDI-II; > BDI-II cutoff = individuals scoring 15 or higher on the BDI-II; never depressed = individuals with no history of MDD; current MDD = individuals currently suffering from MDD; remitted MDD = individuals in remission from MDD; valence = effect comparing negative versus neutral trials; group = effect of group on WMC; Valence × Group = interaction between valence and group.
^a Effect size comparing never depressed vs. combined remitted and MDD for comparison with Experiment 1 and 2. For effect sizes across all three groups, please see main text.
Neutral M (SD)	.53 (.17)	.48 (.13)	.50 (.15)	.43 (.17)	.56 (.15)	.48 (.16)	.53 (.16)
Depressogenic M (SD)	.56 (.19)	.52 (.16)	.53 (.22)	.47 (.19)	.60 (.13)	.51 (.17)	.53 (.19)
aWMC	.03 (.09)	.04 (.08)	.03 (.12)	.04 (.09)	.04 (.12)	.04 (.09)	.00 (.10)
Effect sizes (η_p²)
Valence	η_p² = .15		η_p² = .13		η_p² = .06
Group	η_p² = .02		η_p² = .04		η_p² = .01
Valence × Group^a	η_p² = .01		η_p² = .02		η_p² = .01
	Bayes factor in support of null hypothesis (BF₀₁) and posterior probability for the experimental hypothesis p(H1, D)
Valence	BF₀₁ = 4.53⁻⁴; p(H1, D) = 1		BF₀₁ = .58; p(H1, D) = .63		BF₀₁ = .88; p(H1, D) = .52
WMC: Group	BF₀₁ = 1.87; p(H1, D) = .35		BF₀₁ = 1.87; p(H1, D) = .35		BF₀₁ = 1.13; p(H1, D) = .47
Valence × Group	BF₀₁ = 3.25; p(H1, D) = .23		BF₀₁ = 2.61; p(H1, D) = .28		BF₀₁ = 3.26; p(H1, D) = .23