. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 Mar 1.

Published in final edited form as: Proteins. 2017 Dec 17;86(Suppl 1):387–398. doi: 10.1002/prot.25431

Table 2.

CAMEO lDDT based ranking for the time frame 2016-05-01 - 2016-07-30. Only “public” servers at the time are shown, the underlying individual target sets may differ and thus cannot result in an absolute performance measure.

Server Name	lDDT (all Targets)
Robetta	65.3 ±16.45
RaptorX	63.8±16.57
IntFOLD3-TS^**	62.2±17.53
IntFOLD4-TS	62.0 ±16.32
SWISS-MODEL	56.5±22.49
SPARKS-X	56.3±18.25
Princeton_template	55.6±15.68
IntFOLD2-TS^**	55.1±17.47
HHpredB^*	47.6±17.41
M4T^**	45.1±16.74
Phyre2^**	44.5 ±23.135
NaiveBLAST^**	43.3±25.59
RBO Aleph^*	38.6±16.28

method had technical problems during the CASP12 season, leading to suboptimal or missing data.

^**

Method is not reflecting the current development and shown in CAMEO for historic comparison.