. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 Mar 1.

Published in final edited form as: Proteins. 2017 Dec 17;86(Suppl 1):387–398. doi: 10.1002/prot.25431

Table 3.

Averaged ligand binding site quality scores for the servers registered as public in CAMEO during the CASP12 time frame, the underlying individual target sets may differ and thus do not represent an absolute performance measure.

Server Name	lDDT BS (all targets)
IntFOLD4-TS	67.8±24.58
IntFOLD3-TS^**	67.3±24.57
SWISS-MODEL	66.9±29.01
RaptorX	66.6±22.45
Robetta	66.5±22.51
SPARKS-X	65.0±22.98
IntFOLD2-TS^**	62.3±25.83
M4T^**	58.5±23.79
Princeton_template	56.1±20.83
HHPredB^*	56.0±24.43
Phyre2^**	55.5±30.56
NaiveBlast^**	53.2±27.49
RBO Aleph^*	40.4±25.22

method had technical problems during the CASP12 season, leading to suboptimal or missing data.

^**

Method is not reflecting the current development and shown in CAMEO for historic comparison.