Skip to main content
. 2018 Jan 15;2018:9563714. doi: 10.1155/2018/9563714

Table 2.

Structural model estimates.

H IV Path DV β SE t p Results Remarks
H1a QD → Stress 0.217 0.094 2.307 0.021 Significant Supported
H2a ED → Stress 0.096 0.073 1.318 0.187 Insignificant Not supported
H3a WP → Stress −0.002 0.06 −0.028 0.978 Insignificant Not supported
H4a WFC → Stress 0.201 0.071 2.848 0.004 Significant Supported
H5a RC → Stress −0.102 0.05 −2.04 0.041 Significant Supported
H6a JI → Stress 0.095 0.044 2.142 0.032 Significant Supported
H1b QD → MAP 3.714 1.788 2.078 0.038 Significant Supported
H2b ED → MAP −1.801 1.392 −1.294 0.196 Insignificant Not supported
H3b WP → MAP −1.207 1.132 −1.066 0.286 Insignificant Not supported
H4b WFC → MAP −1.262 1.335 −0.946 0.344 Insignificant Not supported
H5b RC → MAP −0.662 0.943 −0.702 0.483 Insignificant Not supported
H6b JI → MAP 0.042 0.835 0.05 0.96 Insignificant Not supported

Note. WFC = Work-family conflict; RC = role clarity; WP = work pace; JI = job insecurity; ST = stress; QD = quantitative demands; ED = emotional demands; H = hypotheses; IV = independent variable; DV = dependent variable.