Skip to main content
. 2017 Dec 19;318(23):2325–2336. doi: 10.1001/jama.2017.18715

Table 2. Clinical Outcomes Among 30 086 Children in the Retrospective Cohort.

No. (%) Stratified Analysisa Full Matched Analysisb
Broad-Spectrum
Antibiotics
(n = 4296)
Narrow-Spectrum
Antibiotics
(n = 25 790)
Risk Difference
(95% CI), %c
P
Value
Risk Difference
(95% CI), %c
P
Value
Primary Outcomes at 14 d
Treatment failured 147 (3.4) 809 (3.1) 0 (−0.6 to 0.7) .88 0.3 (−0.4 to 0.9) .39
Adverse eventse 157 (3.7) 695 (2.7) 0.9 (0.3 to 1.6) .001 1.1 (0.4 to 1.8) <.001
Secondary Outcomes at 30 d
Treatment failured 372 (8.7) 2082 (8.1) 0.3 (2.6 to 2.8) .51 0.6 (−0.4 to 1.6) .22
Adverse eventse 189 (4.4) 849 (3.3) 1.1 (0.4 to 1.8) .001 1.2 (0.5 to 1.9) <.001
a

Comparisons were made within diagnosis and clinician strata. Risk differences were estimated using fixed-effects linear regression (first differencing method) and diagnosis and clinician strata were included as fixed effects.

b

Children prescribed narrow-spectrum antibiotics were optimally matched to children prescribed broad-spectrum antibiotics based on a propensity score estimated from patient-level and clinical-level characteristics creating matched sets of difference sizes using all children. Risk differences were estimated using weighted logistic regression with marginal standardization.

c

A risk difference of more than 0 means that broad-spectrum antibiotics had a higher risk of the adverse outcome than narrow-spectrum antibiotics.

d

Defined as having the same acute respiratory tract infection diagnosis during the in-person or telephone encounter and a new prescription for a systemic antibiotic.

e

Defined as encounters for diarrhea, vomiting, candidiasis, noncandidal rash, other or unspecified allergic reaction, and other or unspecified adverse event.