Skip to main content
. 2017 Dec 26;318(24):2466–2482. doi: 10.1001/jama.2017.19344

Table 1. Characteristics of the Included Trials and Participants.

Included Trials Treatment Women, No. (%) Mean Age, y Previous Fracture Calcium Intake, mg/d Baseline 25OHD, ng/mL Treatment Duration
Calcium vs Placebo or No Treatment
Inkovaara et al, 1983
(Finland)
1.2 g/d (n = 42)
Placebo (n = 42)
69 (82) 80.1 NA NA NA 9 mo
Hansson and Roos, 1987
(Sweden)
1 g/d (n = 25)
Placebo (n = 25)
50 (100) 65.9 Yes NA NA 3 y
Reid et al, 1993
(New Zealand)
1 g/d (n = 68)
Placebo (n = 67)
135 (100) 58 No vertebral fracture 750 37.5 4 y
Recker et al, 1996
(United States)
1.2 g/d (n = 95)
Placebo (n = 102)
197 (100) 73.5 Partialc 434 25.5e 4 y
Riggs et al, 1998
(United States)
1.6 g/d (n = 119)
Placebo (n = 117)
236 (100) 66.2 No 714 30.1 4 y
Baron et al, 1999
(United States)
1.2 g/d (n = 464)
Placebo (n = 466)
258 (28) 61.0 NA 877 NA 4 y
Ruml et al, 1999
(United States)
0.8 g/d (n = 29)
Placebo (n = 34)
63 (100) 52 No 613 NA 2 y
Peacock et al, 2000
(United States)
0.75 g/d (n = 126)
Placebo (n = 135)
187 (72) 73.8 Partialc 597 25.0 4 y
Avenell et al, 2004
(United Kingdom)
1 g/d (n = 29)
No treatment (n = 35)
NAa (83) 78b Yes NA NA 3.8 y
RECORD
Grant et al, 2005
(United Kingdom)
1 g/d (n = 1311)
Placebo (n = 1332)
2241 (85) 77 Yes NA 15.2e,f 2-5 y
Prince et al, 2006
(Australia)
0.48 g/d (n = 730)
Placebo (n = 730)
1460 (100) 75.2 Partialc 915 31.0e 5 y
Reid et al, 2006
(New Zealand)
1 g/d (n = 732)
Placebo (n = 739)
1471 (100) 74.3 Partialc 857 20.7 5 y
Mitri et al, 2011
(United States)
0.8 g/d (n = 22)
Placebo (n = 24)
23 (50) 58.0 NA 923 24.5 4 mo
Aloia et al, 2013
(United States)
1.2 g/d (n = 35)
Placebo (n = 31)
66 (100) 59.3 NA 898 26.6 6 mo
Vitamin D vs Placebo or No Treatment
Inkovaara et al, 1983
(Finland)
1000 IU/d (n = 45)
Placebo (n = 42)
71 (82) 79.6 NA NA NA 9 mo
Lips et al, 1996
(The Netherlands)
400 IU/d (n = 1291)
Placebo (n = 1287)
1916 (74) 80.0 No hip fracture 868 10.6e 3-4 y
Trivedi et al, 2003
(United Kingdom)
100 000 IU every 4 mo (n = 1345)
Placebo (n = 1341)
649 (24) 74.8 NA 742 NA 5 y
Avenell et al, 2004
(United Kingdom)
800 IU/d (n = 35)
No treatment (n = 35)
NAa (83) 78b Yes NA NA 3.8 y
NONOF
Harwood et al, 2004
(United Kingdom)
300 000 IU once (n = 38)
No treatment (n = 37)
75 (100) 80.5 Yes NA 11.6 1 y
RECORD
Grant et al, 2005
(United Kingdom)
800 IU/d (n = 1343)
Placebo (n = 1332)
2264 (85) 77 Yes NA 15.2e,f 2-5 y
Smith et al, 2007
(United Kingdom)
300 000 IU every year (n = 4727)
Placebo (n = 4713)
5086 (54) 79.1 Partialc 625d 22.6e 3 y
Vital D
Sanders et al, 2010
(Australia)
500 000 IU every year (n = 1131)
Placebo (n = 1127)
2258 (100) 76.1 Partialc 976 19.8e 3-5 y
Mitri et al, 2011
(United States)
2000 IU/d (n = 23)
Placebo (n = 24)
25 (53) 58.0 NA 926 25.3 4 mo
Glendenning et al, 2012
(Australia)
150 000 IU every 3 mo (n = 353)
Placebo (n = 333)
686 (100) 76.7 NA 864 26.3e 9 mo
TIDE
Punthakee et al, 2012
(Canada)
1000 IU/d (n = 607)
Placebo (n = 614)
499 (41) 66.6 Partialc NA NA 4 mo
Aloia et al, 2013
(United States)
4000 IU/d (n = 47)
Placebo (n = 31)
78 (100) 59.3 NA 881 26.1 6 mo
VitDISH
Witham et al, 2013
(United Kingdom)
100 000 IU every 3 mo (n = 80)
Placebo (n = 79)
77 (49) 76.8 NA 1125 18.0 1 y
VitaDial
Massart et al, 2014
(Belgium)
25 000 IU every week (n = 26)
Placebo (n = 29)
21 (38) 64.1 NA 881 17.8 3 mo
DEX
Uusi-Rasi et al, 2015
(Finland)
800 IU/d (n = 102)
Placebo (n = 102)
204 (100) 73.9 NA 1082 26.7 2 y
BEST-D
Hin et al, 2017
(United Kingdom)
4000 IU/d (n = 102)
2000 IU/d (n = 102)
Placebo (n = 101)
150 (49) 71.7 Partialc 710 20.1 1 y
ViDA
Khaw et al, 2017
(New Zealand)
200 000 IU followed by 100 000 IU monthly (n = 2558)
Placebo (n = 2550)
2139 (42) 65.9 Partialc 810d 25.2 3.4 y
Calcium Plus Vitamin D vs Placebo or No Treatment
Inkovaara et al, 1983
(Finland)
Calcium (1.2 g/d) + D3 (1000 IU/d) (n = 46)
Placebo (n = 42)
69 (78) 79.0 NA NA NA 9 mo
Dawson-Hughes et al, 1997
(United States)
Calcium (0.5 g/d) + D3 (700 IU/d) (n = 187)
Placebo (n = 202)
213 (54) 71.1 NA 729 29.6e 3 y
Avenell et al, 2004
(United Kingdom)
Calcium (1 g/d) + D3 (800 IU/d) (n = 35)
No treatment (n = 35)
NAa (83) 78b Yes NA NA 3.8 y
NONOF
Harwood et al, 2004
(United Kingdom)
Calcium (1g/d) + D2 (300 000 IU once) (n = 36)
Calcium (1 g/d) + D3 (800 IU/d) (n = 39)
No treatment (n = 37)
112 (100) 81.7 Yes NA 11.9 1 y
Porthouse et al, 2005
(United Kingdom)
Calcium (1 g/d) + D3 (800 IU/d) (n = 1321)
No treatment (n = 1993)
3314 (100) 76.8 Partialc 1080 NA 1.5-3.5 y
RECORD
Grant et al, 2005
(United Kingdom)
Calcium (1 g/d) + D3 (800 IU/d) (n = 1306)
Placebo (n = 1332)
2232 (85) 77.5 Yes NA 15.2e,f 2-5 y
WHI
Jackson et al, 2006
(United States)
Calcium (1 g/d) + D3 (400 IU/d) (n = 4015)
Placebo (n = 3957)
7972 (100) 62.4 Partialc 1151 18.9e 7 y
Bolton-Smith et al, 2007
(United Kingdom)
Calcium (1 g/d) + D3 (400 IU/d) (n = 62)
Placebo (n = 61)
123 (100) 68.6 NA 1073 23.9 2 y
OSTPRE-FPS
Salovaara et al, 2010
(Finland)
Calcium (1g/d) + D3 (800 IU/d) (n = 1718)
No treatment (n = 1714)
3432 (100) 67.3 Partialc 957 19.8e 3 y
Mitri et al, 2011
(United States)
Calcium (0.8 g/d) + D3 (2000 IU/d) (n = 23)
Placebo (n = 24)
25 (53) 58.0 NA 979 23.3 4 mo
Aloia et al, 2013
(United States)
Calcium (1.2 g/d) + D3 (4000 IU/d) (n = 46)
Placebo (n = 31)
77 (100) 58.0 NA 900 27.3 6 mo
Liu et al, 2015
(China)
Calcium (1.5 g/d) + D3 (600 IU/d) (n = 50)
Placebo (n = 48)
98 (100) 62.1 No 1500 NA 1 y
Xue et al, 2017
(China)
Calcium (0.6 g/d) + D3 (800 IU/d) (n = 139)
Placebo (n = 173)
312 (100) 63.6 Partialc NA 30.8 1 y

Abbreviation: 25OHD, 25-hydroxyvitamin D.

a

Women accounted for 83% of total participants in this trial, but detailed data not available for each group.

b

Mean age is 78 y for total participants in this trial, but detailed data not available for each group.

c

This trial reported partial participants with fracture history.

d

Partial participants were assessed for dietary calcium intake.

e

Partial participants received measurement of baseline 25OHD concentrations.

f

The RECORD trial reported that the mean baseline 25OHD concentrations for a sample of 60 participants was 15.2 ng/mL, but detailed data were not available for each group.