Skip to main content
. 2018 Jan 1;14(1):36–46. doi: 10.7150/ijbs.23082

Table 1.

Biochemical assessment of the LDLR-/-,PSGL-1+/+ and LDLR-/-,PSGL-1-/- mice.

Time 8w 8+8w 8+12w 8+16w
L-/-,P+/+ L-/-,P-/- L-/-,P+/+ L-/-,P-/- L-/-,P+/+ L-/-,P-/-- L-/-,P+/+ L-/-,P-/--
TC (mmol/L) 4.71±0.11 5.41±0.33 13.49±0.87 11.60±1.09 15.55 ±0.53 12.65 ±0.55** 19.87 ±1.07 16.13 ±1.54*
TG (mmol/L) 1.77±0.09 1.30±0.07 2.71±0.17 1.74±0.06*** 2.96 ±0.36 2.45 ±0.14 2.36 ±0.27 1.59 ±0.19*
HDL-c (mmol/L) 1.19±0.16 1.34±0.14 1.96±0.08 2.57±0.25* 2.05±0.09 2.46±0.28* 2.56 ±0.27 4.03 ±0.41*
LDL-c (mmol/L) 1.56±0.18 1.38±0.14 7.88±0.49 5.57±0.31** 11.76 ±1.04 9.11 ±0.38* 15.99 ±0.69 14.47 ±1.09

Note: The LDLR-/-,PSGL-1+/+ (L-/-,P+/+)mice vs. LDLR-/-,PSGL-1-/- (L-/-,P-/-) mice at 8+8 w, 8+12 w, and 8+16 w.* p<0.05, **p<0.01, *** p<0.001. Data were expressed as mean ± SEM.