Table 1. Summary of the five rules of thumb for making surveillance colonoscopy decisions in older adults.
Rules of thumb | Rationale | Example |
---|---|---|
1. Know the data | Knowing the data on CRC* risk and colonoscopy-related harms is essential if we are to make sound recommendations and have meaningful discussions with our patients. | Know the lifetime risk of CRC in patients with LRAs versus HRAs. |
2. Get the full history | Incomplete information on prior colonoscopy quality and findings creates unnecessary ambiguity. | Obtain prior colonoscopy and pathology reports. |
3. Individualize benefits and harms | Benefits and harms vary widely between patients, especially as they get older. | Use decision support tools (e.g., www.screeningdecision.com) and validated life expectancy calculators (e.g., ePrognosis). |
4. Engage the patient | Understanding patients' perspectives can guide decision-making, especially in cases that are not clear cut. | Ask patients about their preferences and values, including worry about cancer and the burdens of colonoscopy. |
5. Work with your colleagues | PCPs* know their patients' current medical and functional status and often have greater insight into their values and preferences. | Act as a consultant, providing clear guidance with appropriate qualifications that provide the PCP with flexibility. |
CRC, colorectal cancer; HRA, high-risk adenoma; LRA, low-risk adenoma; PCP, primary care provider.