Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Feb 21.
Published in final edited form as: J Am Chem Soc. 2017 Oct 9;139(41):14757–14766. doi: 10.1021/jacs.7b08714

Table 1.

EXAFS Simulation of 6a

Path CN R, Å σ2, Å2 E0 F, %
Fe–Npyrrole 2 1.987(8) 0.0003(6) −7.61 29.5
Fe–Cl 1 2.222(5) 0.0011(4)
Fe–Niminyl 1 1.761(6) 0.0004(7)
a

EXAFS were fit in OPT using paths calculated by FEFF7. Coordination numbers (CN) were held constant while distances (R) and Debye–Waller factors (σ2) were allowed to float. Parenthetical values correspond to fitting errors in R and σ2 in the final significant digit. Errors in coordination number are estimated at 25%. Fits were performed over the entire (0 to 6.0 Å) Fourier transform window. Goodness of fit is measured by F, defined as [(in[ki3(EXAFSobs-EXAFScalc)i])2/n]1/2. Additional fitting details are included in the Supporting Information.