Skip to main content
. 2017 Mar 2;41(2):147–162. doi: 10.1177/0361684317690119

Table 2.

Between-Group Comparisons of Post-Intervention Measures of Risk Assessment and Use of Direct Resistance by Time of Coercion (First and Second).

Time of Coercion
First Coercion Second Coercion
(n = 430) (n = 430)
Measure Group (n = 421) (n = 421) p Value
Risk assessment EAAA Mean (SE) 52.2 (0.5) 60.9 (0.5) <.001
Control Mean (SE) 50.2 (0.5) 58.5 (0.5) <.001
Difference 2.0 2.4
95% CI [0.7, 3.3] [1.1, 3.7]
Cohen’s d 0.22 0.26
p Value* .002 <.001
Direct resistance EAAA Mean (SE) 28.1 (0.5) 36.3 (0.5) <.001
Control Mean (SE) 24.0 (0.5) 32.4 (0.5) <.001
Difference 4.1 3.9
95% CI [2.9, 5.4] [2.6, 5.1]
Cohen’s d 0.44 0.41
p Value* <.001 <.001

Note. SE = standard error; CI = confidence interval; EAAA = Enhanced Assess, Acknowledge, Act program.

*p Value comparing means at each time of coercion. p Value comparing first and second coercion means.