Skip to main content
. 2018 Feb 21;13(2):e0192342. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0192342

Table 2. Treatments used in the present study.

Treatment group Expected atmosphere O2 transmission rate of pouch (mL m−2 d−1 atm−1) CO2 absorberd
1 Normoxia 1.2 × 106 a
2 Anoxia 8.0 b
3 Anoxia without CO2 8.0 b +
4 Anoxia 64.0 c

aMicro-perforated polypropylene pouch (thickness, 30 μm; P-plus; Sumitomo Bakelite Co. Ltd., Tokyo, Japan).

bHigh-barrier laminated (nylon/polyethylene) pouch (thickness, 118 μm; Lamizip®; As One Co., Ltd., Osaka, Japan).

cHigh-barrier laminated (nylon/polyethylene) pouch (thickness, 40 μm; P-plus; Sumitomo Bakelite Co. Ltd., Tokyo, Japan).

dAgeless C® (Mitsubishi Gas Chemical Co. Inc., Tokyo, Japan).