Abstract
Severe congenital neutropenias are a heterogeneous group of rare haematological diseases that are characterized by impaired maturation of neutrophil granulocytes. Patients with severe congenital neutropenia are prone to recurrent, often life-threatening infections beginning in their first months of life. The most frequent pathogenetic defects are autosomal dominant mutations in ELANE, which encodes neutrophil elastase, and autosomal recessive mutations in HAX1, whose product contributes to the activation of the granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) signalling pathway. The pathophysiological mechanisms of these conditions are the object of extensive research and are not fully understood. Furthermore, severe congenital neutropenias may predispose to myelodysplastic syndromes or acute myeloid leukaemia. Molecular events in the malignant progression include acquired mutations in CSF3R (encoding G-CSF receptor) and subsequently in other leukaemia-associated genes (such as RUNX1) in a majority of patients. Diagnosis is based on clinical manifestations, blood neutrophil count, bone marrow examination, and genetic and immunological analyses. Daily subcutaneous G-CSF administration is the treatment of choice and leads to a substantial increase in blood neutrophils count, reduction of infections and drastic improvement of quality of life. Haematopoietic stem cell transplantation is the alternative treatment. Regular clinical assessments (including yearly bone marrow examinations) to monitor treatment course and detect chromosomal abnormalities (e.g. trisomy 21, monosomy 7) as well as somatic pre-leukaemic mutations are recommended.
Graphical abstract

Introduction
The severe congenital neutropenias comprise a group of inherited disorders of haematopoiesis characterized by impaired differentiation of neutrophilic granulocytes and, as a result, severe chronic neutropenia, defined as blood absolute neutrophil counts (ANCs) < 0.5 × 109/L. Bone marrow examination in the majority of patients reveals a maturation arrest of myelopoiesis at the level of promyelocytes1, which generally leads to reduced neutrophil counts but elevated numbers of atypical promyelocytes (Figure 1). In these patients, the risk of infections such as otitis, gingivitis, skin infections, pneumonia, deep abscesses and septicaemia begins in the neonatal period,1,2 and, without proper treatment, continues throughout life. Furthermore, patients with severe congenital neutropenia have an increased risk of developing leukemia. Mutations in numerous genes have been linked to congenital neutropenia.
Figure 1. Maturation arrest of granulopoiesis in patients with severe congenital neutropenia.

A | Normal differentiation of myeloid progenitor cells into neutrophils in the bone marrow and peripheral blood. Right: In a May Grunewald Giemsa stained bone marrow smear of a healthy individual promyelocyte (black arrow) and neutrophil granulocyte (white arrow) are indicated.
B | In patients with severe congenital neutropenia, the maturation of granulocytic precursor cells arrests at the stage of promyelocytes and myelocytes, which accumulate in the bone marrow. Right: In a hematoxylin-eosin stained bone marrow smear of a patient with severe congenital neutropenia there are no mature granulocytes and elevated numbers of promyelocytes (arrow). The morphology of promyelocytes is also different: in patients with severe congenital neutropenia, promyelocytes have multiple vacuoles (white arrow), a bulked nucleus and are much bigger than promyelocytes of healthy individuals.
ST-HSC, short-term haematopoietic stem cell; MPP, multipotent progenitor; LMPP, lymphoid-primed multipotent progenitor; GMP, granulocyte-macrophage progenitor.
Although neutropenia is a hallmark shared by all of the severe congenital neutropenias, the severity of neutropenia varies, and might vary even in the same patient over time. The increasing knowledge of the mutations and the intracellular signalling pathways implicated in severe congenital neutropenias has helped us to understand the underlying disease mechanisms of aberrant molecular haematopoiesis and leukemogenesis.
In this Primer, we focus on the genetic mutations that lead to severe forms of congenital neutropenia and discuss recent advances in understanding severe congenital neutropenias, from epidemiology, genetics and pathophysiology to screening, diagnosis and management.
Epidemiology
Prevalence
Severe congenital neutropenia is a rare condition: its prevalence is estimated to be 3-8.5 cases per million individuals3,4. The establishment of registries for patients with severe chronic neutropenia has helped to identify cases and the prevalence and relative frequency of each specific condition. Prevalence depends on several factors: the success of the mother's pregnancy, the frequency of neonatal deaths from infections or other causes, the pattern of inheritance for the specific genetic disorder and the ascertainment of the diagnosis through measurement of the blood ANC early in life. The physician's awareness and availability of basic diagnostic tools are also contributing factors. Most infants worldwide do not have a complete blood cell count done at birth, and most cases of neutropenia early in life are attributable to prematurity or immunological mechanisms. For this reason, severe congenital neutropenia is usually an inferred diagnosis based on fever and recurrent infections early in life and measurement of the blood ANC associated with these events.
Inheritance
Demographics also play an important part in epidemiology. Worldwide autosomal dominant disorders appear to be more common, and, and the recessive disorders are usually diagnosed in consanguineous populations. Differences in the rate of consanguinity are probably the main reason that could explain the observed differences in the prevalence of specific neutropenia-associated mutations between Europe and North America. For example, the prevalence of severe congenital neutropenia due to HAX1 mutations in Europe is high (11%) probably owing to the large number of consanguineous families of Turkic or Arabic origin. By contrast, in the United States no patients with HAX1 mutations have been detected so far. In Israel, a unique pattern of mutations with a high prevalence of G6PC3 mutations (25%) was found5. These informations are very useful in clinical practice. When using genetic sequencing to confirm a diagnosis of severe congenital neutropenia, sequencing ELANE should be considered first, as mutations in ELANE are are most common, unless the patient's family history and clinical clues from the physical examination or general laboratory testing suggest otherwise. As targeted-next generation sequencing and exome sequencing become more widely used as diagnostic tools, we can expect that new variants associated with severe congenital neutropenia will be identified, adding to our knowledge and perhaps making diagnosis somewhat more-confusing.
Other hereditary factors are involved in determining the prevalence of congenital neutropenia. Individuals of African heritage have lower blood neutrophil counts compared with persons of white European or Asian origin6. Within the African heritage group, the presence of a specific polymorphism in DARC (encoding the Duffy antigen) has been linked with neutropenia6,7. This condition is now often referred to as “benign ethnic neutropenia”, as it is not associated with infections or evolution to myeloid malignancies. There are other forms of benign ethnic neutropenia and probably others to be discovered7. Interestingly, individuals carrying the neutropenia-associated Duffy antigen are not predisposed to develop other forms of neutropenia, as reflected by the scarcity of persons of African heritage in the Severe Chronic Neutropenia International Registry (SCNIR) or in the French Neutropenia Registry.
Mortality
The mortality rate for severe congenital neutropenia prior to the antibiotic era (1950s) was as high as 90%8, and even with antibiotics, >80% of patients would die from severe bacterial infections9. A breakthrough in the treatment of severe congenital neutropenias occurred with the availability of recombinant granulocyte-colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) for clinical use10 (Figure 2). Treatment with G-CSF resulted in an increase of neutrophils to more than 1 × 109/L 11,12,13, and a statistically significant decrease in the number and severity of infectious episodes, leading to a dramatic improvement of the quality of life14. The clinical benefits of G-CSF therapy were clearly demonstrated in a Phase III clinical trial14. Intriguingly, granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) did not lead to an increase in ANC in the majority of patients13
Figure 2. Milestones of the history of severe congenital neutropenia.
Severe congenital neutropenia was first described in 1922 (Ref146), but referred to as ”agranulocytosis“ or Schultz syndrome 8,147,148. In 1956, Rolf Kostmann described for the first time the autosomal recessive inheritance of familial agranulocytosis and named it as ”infantile genetic agranulocytosis“29 Subsequently, the term ”Kostmann syndrome” was used for many years for patients with severe congenital neutropenia. In 1959, a family with dominant inheritance of neutropenia was reported for the first time149 and in 1970 severe congenital neutropenia was first recognized as a preleukemic syndrome9. Recombinant human granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) (for example filgrastim and lenograstim became available for clinical research in 198710 and was approved by the FDA for the treatment of congenital neutropenia in 1993 (Ref14). First description of the: GFI1 gene mutation150 the CXCR4151 TCIRG1152. First description of the acquired CSF3R mutations in severe congenital neutropenia patients153
Today, G-CSF is the treatment of choice for severe congenital neutropenias. Overall survival is now estimated to exceed 80%, including patients developing malignancies15,16, although approximately 10% of patients (mainly G-CSF non-responders) still die from sepsis or severe bacterial infections3,16,17. In patients without non-haematologic involvement, survival mainly depends on their response to G-CSF treatment, whereas in the subtypes of severe congenital neutropenias that also present with extra-haematopoietic manifestations, survival depends on both the severity of neutropenia and of organ defects. For example, in Barth syndrome, a severe congenital neutropenia associated with congestive heart failure (Table 1), survival is approximately 51% at five years, and largely depends on the severity of heart failure and availability of a heart transplant.18 However, because genetic analyses of severe congenital neutropenias are relatively recent and the majority of patients are children, adolescents and young adults, there is limited data correlating age, risk factors and life expectancy for each specific aetiology of severe congenital neutropenia. Evolution to myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) or acute myeloid leukaemia (AML) are other major possible complications; data from the SCNIR indicates that the cumulative incidence of leukemia was estimated to be 22% after 10 years in a population of 374 patients with severe congenital neutropenia, regardless of their genetic diagnosis16,17. Of note, in this study the risk of leukaemia increased with the dose of G-CSF, as less responsive patients, who required higher doses of G-CSF, had a cumulative incidence of leukemia of 40% after 15 years, compared with 11% in more-responsive patients16,17. The proposed interpretation was that a poor response to G-CSF defines an ‘at risk’ population of patients with severe congenital neutropenia and predicts an adverse outcome. In the French Neutropenia registry at the time of the analysis, 13 cases of leukemia were recorded among 231 patients observed for a total of 3166 person years19. The cumulative incidence of MDS or AML was 2.7% at 10 years and 8.1% at 20 years19. In the SCNIR, 44 cases of leukemia were recorded among 374 patients observed for a total of 2043 person years.16,17 The main difference in the methodologies of these two studies was the inclusion of patients who did not receive G-CSF in the French registry, whereas all patients in the SCNIR analysis had received G-CSF. Of note, patients wits SBDS mutations (which cause Shwachman-Diamond syndrome (Table 1) the risk was comparable to that of patients with ELANE or HAX1 mutations17.
Table 1. The congenital neutropenias*.
| Gene mutated | Disease | Other haematologic abnormalities | Non-haematologic abnormalities | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Autosomal dominant inheritance | ||||
| ELANE | Severe congenital neutropenia | Monocytosis, eosinophilia and evolution to AML or MDS | Osteopenia | |
| ELANE | Cyclic neutropenia | Cyclic hematopoiesis and evolution to AML orMDS | None | |
| GFI1 | Severe congenital neutropenia | Lymphopenia, increased numbers of immature myeloid cells in the peripheral blood | None | |
| GATA2 | Congenital neutropenia | Severe monocytopenia, dendritic cells and natural killer cells deficiencies, aplastic anaemia and evolution to AML or MDS | Mycobacteria, fungi or human papilloma virus infections; pulmonary dysfunction including pulmonary alveolar proteinosis ; warts and leg lymphedema | |
| TCIRG1 | Severe congenital neutropenia | None | In some patients, prominent hemangiomas that became more-prominent during G-CSF treatment | |
| CXCR4 | Congenital neutropenia, warts, hypogammaglobulinemia, infections, and myelokathexis (WHIM) syndrome | B cell defects and hypogammaglobulinemia | Warts | |
| Autosomal recessive inheritance | ||||
| HAX1 | Severe congenital neutropenia | Evolution to AML or MDS | Neurological phenotype in patients with two specific mutations | |
| JAGN1 | Severe congenital neutropenia | None | Short stature and bone and teeth defects | |
| G6PC3 | Severe congenital neutropenia | Thrombocytopenia and evolution to AML or MDS | Cardial defects, increased superficial veins visibility, urogenital malformations, endocrine abnormalities and skin hyper-elasticity | |
| SLC37A4 | Congenital neutropenia, glycogen storage disease, type Ib (GSDIb) | None | Hypoglycemia, fasting hyper-lactacidemia, glycogen overload of the liver, colitis, pancreatitis and osteoporosis | |
| SBDS | Shwachman-Diamond syndrome | Thrombocytopenia, anemia, aplastic anemia, evolution to AML/MDS | Exocrine pancreatic insufficiency, cardiomyopathy, metaphyseal dysplasia, mental retardation and hepatic disease | |
| STK4 | Congenital neutropenia | Monocytopenia and T- and B- lymphopenia | Warts and atrial septal defects | |
| CLPB | 3-Methyglutaco-nic aciduria type VII | Evolution to AML or MDS | Psychomotor retardation, progressive brain atrophy, cataracts, 3-methylglutaconic aciduria, facial dysmorphism, cardiomyopathy or hypertrophy and hypothyroidism | |
| AP3B1 | Hermansky-Pud-lak syndrome 2 | Impaired function of T cells and natural killer cells | Oculocutaneous albinism and haemorrhagic diathesis | |
| LAMTOR2 | p14 deficiency | Accumulation of neutrophils in the bone marrow, defective cytotoxicity and lymphoid immunodeficiency | Oculocutaneous albinism and stunted growth | |
| USB1 | Clericuzio type poikiloderma | None | Poikiloderma, generalized hyperkeratosis on palms and soles, short stature and recurrent pulmonary infections | |
| VPS13B | Cohen syndrome | None | Psychomotor retardation, truncal obesity, microencephaly, skeletal dysplasia, hypotonia, myopia | |
| VPS45 | Congenital neutropenia‖ | Anisocytosis and poikilocytosis, hypergammaglobulinemia, renal extramedullary haematopoiesis, bone marrow fibrosis, progressive anaemia and thrombocytopenia | Nephromegaly, splenomegaly, osteosclerosis, neurologic abnormalities such as delayed development, cortical blindness, hearing loss and thin corpus callosum | |
| CXCR2 | Congenital neutropenia | Myelokathexis owing to impaired neutrophil release from the bone marrow to the peripheral blood | NA | |
| EIF2AK3 | Wolcott-Rallison syndrome | None | Early infancy-onset insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus, epiphyseal dysplasia, growth retardation, hepatic and renal dysfunction, developmental delay and exocrine pancreatic deficiency | |
| LYST | Chédiak-Higashi syndrome | Defective natural killer cell function; lysosomal inclusion bodies in the myeloblasts, promyelocytes and granulocytes; macrophage activation and lymphoproliferative syndrome | Oculocutaneous albinism and neurodegeneration | |
| RAB27A | Griscelli synd-rome, type 2 | Defective cytotoxicity, hypogammaglobulinemia, thrombocytopenia, anaemia and haemophagocytosis | Oculocutaneous albinism | |
| AK2 | Adenylate kinase 2 deficiency | Severe lymphopenia | Inner ear hearing loss | |
| RMRP | Cartilage-hair hypoplasia | Immunodeficiency and anaemia | Hypoplastic hair, skeletal dysplasia and cartilage hypoplasia | |
| TCN2 | Transcobalamin II deficiency | Megaloblastic anaemia and pancytopenia | Methylmalonic aciduria, failure to thrive, recurrent infections, mental retardation and neurologic abnormalities | |
| Various autosomal inheritance‡ | ||||
| CSF3R | Severe congenital neutropenia§ | None | None | |
| X-linked inheritance | ||||
| WAS | Congenital neutropenia | Monocytopenia, lymphopenia, reduced numbers of natural killer cells and abrogated phagocyte activity | None | |
| TAZ | Barth syndrome | None | Cardiomyopathy, skeletal myopathy, stunted growth, cardiolipin abnormalities and 3-methylglutaconic aciduria | |
| CD40LG | CD40 ligand deficiency, hyper-IgM syndrome type I (HIGM1) | Combined immunodeficiency; T cells, B cells and dendritic cells deficiencies; defective B cell class switch; markedly reduced levels of IgG, IgA and IgE but normal or elevated levels of IgM and reduced macrophage effector functions | Increased susceptibility to bacterial, viral and fungal infections and increased risk for developing autoimmune disorders and malignancies | |
| Mitochondrial DNA inheritance | ||||
| Mitochondrial DNA deletion | Pearson syndrome | Refractory sideroblastic anaemia and vacuolization of bone marrow precursors and macrophages | Exocrine pancreas and renal insufficiency or fibrosis, endocrine abnormalities, neuromuscular degeneration and mitochondrial myopathy | |
For completeness, all known genes that have been associated with congenital neutropenia are reported in this table, regardless of the severity of the phenotype.
dominant, homozygous recessive or compound heterozygous recessive
no response to G-CSF, good response to GM-CSF with increased granulocyte counts
poor or no response to G-CSF in some patients
AML, acute myeloid leukaemia; MDS, myelodysplastic syndrome, G-CSF, granulocyte-colony stimulating factor; GM-CSF, granulocyte-macrophage-colony stimulating factor; NA, not available
Mechanisms/pathophysiology
The establishment of the SCNIR and several national registries has enabled the performance of genetic and molecular studies in these rare disorders and prompted the identification of mutations in >20 genes that impair the neutrophil differentiation program (Figure 3).
Figure 3. Genes with germline mutations associated with severe congenital neutropenia.

Data based from 650 patients with severe congenital neutropenia registered in the European and North-American Branches of the Severe Chronic Neutropenia International Registry. *Mutations in JAGN1, LAMTOR2, GFI1, LYST, USB1 or mitochondrial DNA.
Germline mutations
ELANE mutations
The majority of patients with autosomal dominant severe congenital neutropenia harbor heterozygous ELANE mutations20,21. ELANE encodes neutrophil elastase (NE), a cytotoxic serine protease that stored in azurophil granules and is released after neutrophil activation. NE hydrolizes multiple protein substrates, including cell-surface proteins (G-CSF-Receptor, VCAM, c-kit, and CXCR4). It is also involved in the function of neutrophil extracellular traps (networks of fibers that bind pathogens) 20-22. More than 200 different ELANE mutations have been identified, randomly distributed over all exons as well as in introns 3 and 4 22,23,24. There is a substantial overlap in the mutations causing severe congenital neutropenia and those causing cyclic neutropenia, revealing that genotyping alone is not sufficient to establish a clinical diagnosis23-26. Some ELANE mutations, such as p.C151Y or p.G214R, cause a more-severe phenotype in terms of increased risk of leukemogenesis, poor G-CSF response, and risk of severe infections16. In addition, there are cases of phenotypically healthy parents with mosaicism of ELANE mutations (that is, who harbor two populations of cells, one with ELANE mutations the other with wild type ELANE) whose children have inherited neutropenia in an autosomal dominant way27,28.
HAX1 mutations
Homozygous mutations in HAX1, which encodes HCLS1-associated protein X-1 (HAX-1), can be found in patients with autosomal recessive congenital neutropenia especially in consanguineous pedigrees, such as the families in which severe congenital neutropenia was originally described 4,29,30. There are two HAX-1 splice isoforms and genotype-phenotype studies have shown that HAX1 mutations affecting both isoforms (mainly p.Q190X in the original patients and p.R86X in Japanese patients) cause severe congenital neutropenia with neurological symptoms31,32 (for example, developmental delay and epileptic seizures). Mutations affecting only one isoform (mainly p.W44X, found in consanguineous families of Turkic origin) lead to severe congenital neutropenia without neurological involvement30. HAX-1 is a ubiquitously expressed protein, but the binding partner of HAX-1, hematopoietic lineage cell-specific protein (HCLS1), is an essential adaptor protein of the G-CSF receptor (G-CSFR) signalling33,34. Indeed, mice with deletions of Hcls1 are neutropenic33. In patients with HAX1 mutations, neutropenia probably results from the abrogated activation of HCLS1 and its downstream signaling, which is essential for granulopoiesis.
Mutations causing extra-haematopoietic abnormalities
Severe congenital neutropenia could also be caused by rare mutations (Figure 3) that lead to severe neutropenia in combination with non-haematopoietic organ failures (Table 1). Examples of other affected tissues or organs include heart (G6PC335, TAZ36), urogenital system (G6PC3)35, bone (SBDS37), exocrine pancreas (SBDS), skin (LAMTOR238, RAB27A39) and liver (glycogen storage; SLC37A440,41) (Tables 1, 2). These mutations affect various functions of haematopoietic stem cells and myeloid cells (Figure 4). In patients harboring one of these mutations, the bone marrow morphology shows a great maturation clearly arrests at the level of promyelocytes21,30.
Table 2. Molecular pathological mechanisms in severe congenital neutropenias.
| Gene | Protein; functions | Pathological mechanisms | Knockout mouse model |
|---|---|---|---|
| ELANE | Neutrophil elastase; secondary granule protease | Activation of the UPR and apoptosis of myeloid progenitor cells | Normal granulopoiesis and high susceptibility to infections |
| HAX1 | HCLS1-associated protein X-1; activation of HCLS1 adaptor protein in G-CSF signalling and anti-apoptotic functions | Reduced mitochondrial membrane potential, elevated apoptosis and abrogated G-CSFR signalling | Normal granulopoiesis and neurological defects |
| JAGN1 | Protein jagunal homolog 1; early secretory pathway, cell adhesion and cytotoxicity | Aberrant N-glycosylation of multiple proteins, elevated apoptosis and poor to no G-CSF response | Normal granulopoiesis and severely impaired response to Candida albicans. |
| G6PC3 | Glucose-6-phosphatase 3; Hydrolyzation of glucose-6-phosphate to glucose and phosphate in the ER | Impaired intracellular glucose homeostasis, UPR activation and elevated apoptosis of myeloid cells | Neutropenia but no cardiac or urogenital defects |
| SLC37A4 | Glucose-6-Phosphate, exchanger; ransport of glucose-6-phosphate from the cytoplasm to the ER lumen, maintainment of glucose homeostasis and ATP-mediated calcium sequestration in the ER | Defective trans -ER transport, abnormal glycolysis and gluconeogenesis, elevated apoptosis of neutrophils and neutrophil dis-function | Lethal shortly after birth |
| WAS | Wiskott-Aldrich syndrome protein; regulation of actin rearrangement | Enhanced actin polymerization, altered cytoskeletal responses and genomic instability | NA |
| GFI1 | Zinc finger protein Gfi-1; transcriptional repressor interacting with myeloid-specific transcription factors C/EBPα, C/EBPβ and PU.1 | Diminished myeloid differentiation | Neutropenia and expansion of monocytic progenitors upon G-CSF treatment |
| STK4 | Serine/threonine protein kinase 4; upstream component of the mitogen-activated protein kinase pathway | Enhanced loss of mitochondrial membrane potential and increased susceptibility to apoptosis | Normal granulopoiesis and progressive loss of T cells and B cells |
| GATA2 | Endothelial transcription factor GATA-2; embryonic and definitive hematopoiesis and lymphatic angiogenesis | Deregulated proliferation and differentiation of HSCs and reduced numbers of HSCs pool | Embryonic lethality around day 13 owing to loss of vascular integrity |
| SBDS | Ribosome maturation protein SBDS; regulation of later steps of ribosome biogenesis and mitotic spindle stabilization | Mitotic spindle destabilization, genomic instability and enhanced apoptosis of HSCs | Embryonic lethality |
| TAZ | Tafazzin; acyltransferase in lipid metabolism and regulation of phospholipid membrane homeostasis | Destabilization of mitochondrial respiratory chain complexes and elevated apoptosis | NA |
| CXCR4 | C-X-C chemokine receptor type 4; HSCs homing and myeloid cells retention to the bone marrow | Reduced egress of HSCs and mature neutrophils from the bone marrow | Severely reduced B-lymphopoiesis and lack of bone marrow myelopoiesis |
| AP3B1 | AP-3 complex subunit beta-1; cargo protein in endosomal trafficking | Defective endosome formation and processing and endosomal or lysosomal defects in immune cells | Normal granulopoiesis |
| LAMTOR2 | Ragulator complex protein LAMTOR2; regulation of endosomal trafficking and sorting, growth factor signalling and cell proliferation | Defective MAPK and ERK signaling, diminished phagocytosis and disturbed endosomal trafficking | Normal granulopoiesis |
| USB1 | U6 snRNA Phosphodiesterase; exoribonuclease in RNA processing from pre-RNA | Diminished biogenesis of U6 small nuclear RNA and elevated apoptosis | NA |
| VPS13B | Vacuolar protein sorting-associated protein 13B; intracellular vesicle-mediated sorting and protein transport and Golgi complex integrity | Glycosylation defects of newly synthesized proteins | NA |
| LYST | Lysosomal trafficking regulator; endosomal protein trafficking. | Defective sorting of endosomal resident proteins | Normal granulopoiesis |
| RAB27A | Ras-related protein Rab-27A; protein transport, small GTPase mediated signaling and lytic granule release | Defective vesicular trafficing, protein transport, endocytic and secretory pathway. | Normal granulopoiesis and reduction in coat color intensity |
| AK2 | Adenylate kinase 2; transfer of the terminal phosphate group between ATP and AMP | Aberrant mitochondrial metabolism and regulation of apoptosis | Normal granulopoiesis |
| CD40LG | CD40 ligand; expressed on activated T cells, necessary for T cells to induce B cells to undergo Ig class-switching | Defective Ig class switch and defective in vivo clonal expansion of antigen-specific CD4+ T cells | Normal granulopoiesis, and decreased IgM response to thymus-dependent antigens |
| TCIRG1 | V-type proton ATPase 116 kDa subunit a isoform 3; pH regulation of intracellular compartments and organelles of eukaryotic cells, including neutrophil phagocytic vacuoles and T-lymphocyte activation and immune response | Possible defective bone marrow nich regulation of granulopoiesis owing to osteopetrosis or osteoclasts activation or direct effects on promyelocyte differentiation | Osteopetrosis, granulopoiesis not studied yet |
| CSF3R | G-CSF receptor | no G-CSF response owing to the absent expression of G-CSFR on the cell surface | Mice with a neo cassette replacing exons 3-8 of Csf3r have a decreased number of circulating neutrophils and a 50% decrease of hematopoietic stem cells, myeloid progenitor cells and granulocytes in bone marrow |
| VPS45 | Vacuolar protein sorting-associated protein 45; regulation of assembly of the SNARE (soluble N ethylma-leimide sensitive factor attachment protein receptor) complex, which plays an essential part in the trafficking and recycling of proteins through lysosomes, other endosomes and trans-Golgi complex | Degradation of key components of the SNARE complex and defective transport of proteins from the trans-Golgi network to endosomes, impaired cell motility, increased apoptosis, NADPH-oxidase dysfunction and diminished superoxide production by neutrophils and lack of surface expression of β1 integrin | NA |
| CXCR2 | C-X-C hhemokine receptor type 2; chemotaxis of neutrophils to the site of inflammation and migration from the bone marrow to peripheral blood | Abolished IL8-induced Erk1/2 phosphorylation and chemotaxis | Neutrophils are preferentially retained in the bone marrowand have a severe defect in migration to sites of inflammation |
| EIF2AK3 | Eukaryotic translation initiation factor 2-alpha kinase 3;phosphorylation and inactivation of eIF2A; type I ER membrane protein induced by ER stress owing to misfolded proteins | Failure in translational initiation and repression of global protein synthesis and mitochondrial functions | Progressive loss of insulin-secreting beta cells and development of diabetes mellitus followed by loss of glucagon-secreting alpha cells, skeletal dysplasia at birth (including deficient mineralization, osteoporosis, and abnormal compact bone development) and postnatal growth retardation. Haematopoiesis was not studied |
| TCN2 | Transcobalamin-2; transport of cobalamin (vitamin B12) from the blood stream to the cells | Defective plasma transport of Vitamin B12 resulting in B12 deficiency | NA |
UPR, unfolded protein response; HCLS1, haematopoietic lineage cell-specific protein; G-CSFR, granulocyte-colony stimulating factor receptor; NA, not available; ER, endoplasmic reticulum, HSC, haematopoietic stem cell.
Figure 4. Main cellular localization of proteins mutated in patients with congenital neutropenia.

Mutant proteins are distributed throughout different cellular compartments, including azurophil granules (neutrophil elastase (NE)), plasma membrane (granulocyte-colony stimulating factor receptor (G-CSFR) and C-X-C chemokine receptor type 4 (CXCR4)), endosomes and lysosomes (AP-3 complex subunit beta-1 (AP3B1), lysosomal-trafficking regulator (LYST), Ras-related protein Rab-27A (RAB27A) and ragulator complex protein LAMTOR2 (p14)), mitochondria (HCLS1-associated protein X-1 (HAX-1), tafazzin (TAZ), adenylate kinase 2 (AK2)), endoplasmic reticulum (glucose-6-phosphate exchanger SLC37A4 (G6PT1), glucose-6-phosphatase 3 (G6PC3), protein jagunal homolog 1 (JAGN1) and vacuolar protein sorting-associated protein 13B (VPS13B)), ribosomes (ribosome maturation protein SBDS (SBDS)), nucleus (zinc finger protein Gfi-1 (GFI1) and endothelial transcription factor GATA-2 (GATA2)) and cytoskeleton (Wiskott-Aldrich syndrome protein (WAS) and HCLS1-associated protein X-1 (HAX-1)). The functions of these proteins are described in Table 2.
Multigenic mutations
Intriguingly, some patients with severe congenital neutropenia harbour inherited mutations in more than one neutropenia-associated gene. Combinations of G6PC3 and ELANE or HAX1 and ELANE mutations have been reported42. In the latter combination, the influence of each mutation is hard to analyze, as both mutations lead to severe neutropenia. In combinations of G6PC3 with ELANE or HAX1, patients may show symptoms of both inherited mutations42. The additional mutation besides the driving monoallelic autosomal or biallelic recessive mutations may have an influence on the disease severity. Next generation sequencing-based evaluation of all known neutropenia-causing mutations will probably reveal more cases of digenic or even multigenic mutations and lead to a better understanding of the influence of each mutation.
Germline CSF3R mutations
Of note, germline bi-allelic CSF3R mutations affecting the extracellular part of G-CSFR and leading to reduced or completely abrogated G-CSF signal transduction have been reported in rare cases of severe congenital neutropenia43-45. The pattern of inheritance of these mutations is: one mutated allele from the mother, the other mutated allele from the father (Table 1) Interestingly, some patients with germline bi-allelic CSF3R mutations respond to GM-CSF43.
Pathological mechanisms
The dysregulated molecular pathways that underlie the arrest of granulopoiesis at the promyelocyte stage can vary based on the different genetic aetiologies. However, some pathological mechanisms are shared by different mutations. We will focus our discussion on the mechanisms that are better characterized, owing to the larger numbers of patients with a common aetiology.
Endoplasmic reticulum stress and apoptosis of myeloid cells
Mutant neutrophil elastase could not be properly folded, processed, secreted or degraded in myeloid cells of patients with severe congenital neutropenia associated with ELANE mutations, depending on which elastase domain was affected by the mutation30,46,47. Also, a neutropenia-associated ELANE mutation that disrupts the translational start generates a shorter form of neutrophil elastase, which leads to aberrant localization of the mutated protein48. Intracellular accumulation and mislocalization of the mutant neutrophil elastase induces endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stress and activates the unfolded protein response (UPR)49-52, leading to increased apoptosis associated with up-regulation of the master ER chaperone 78 kDa glucose-regulated protein (GRP-78), XBP1 mRNA splicing and activation of ATF649-52. The magnitude of UPR activation varies with different ELANE mutations49-52. Interestingly, drastically diminished levels of ELANE mRNA in promyelocytes and neutrophil elastase in plasma of patients with severe congenital neutropenia have been reported53,54, a finding that questions how these low levels of mutated protein could induce the UPR. It is also not clear why the same ELANE mutations activate the UPR in patients with severe congenital neutropenia but not in patients with cyclic neutropenia. Patients with severe congenital neutropenia have diminished levels of anti-leukoproteinase (SLPI), the natural inhibitor of neutrophil elastase, in promyelocytes and plasma55. SLPI might regulate the extent of UPR triggered by mutant neutrophil elastase and, therefore, a deficiency in SLPI might explain how even low levels of neutrophil elastase can induce UPR. Patients with cyclic neutropenia have normal levels of SLPI, and this could protect cells from UPR. Expression of the ER-stress related proteins GRP-78 and phosphorylated eukaryotic translation initiation factor 2A (eIF-2A) are also increased in neutrophils from patients with G6PC3 mutations35.
Elevated apoptosis was observed in the bone marrow myeloid progenitor cells of patients with severe congenital neutropenia with ELANE or HAX1 mutations47,56,57. Diminished expression of anti-apoptotic proteins apoptosis regulator Bcl-2 (Bcl-2), Bcl2-associated agonist of cell death (Bcl-xL) and baculoviral IAP repeat-containing protein 5 (survivin), but elevated expression of Bcl-2-related protein A1 (BFL-1) and induced myeloid leukaemia cell differentiation protein Mcl-1 (mcl1/EAT) was detected56,57. HAX-1 is also expressed in mitochondria, functioning as an anti-apoptotic protein; mutated HAX1 causes apoptosis of myeloid progenitors by loss of mitochondrial function30. Furthermore, mitochondrial release of cytochrome c was also increased in myeloid progenitors from patients with HAX1 mutations but not in controls35,47. Interestingly, these patients had elevated survivin levels in myeloid cells58. Morphologic studies and laboratory evidence suggest that apoptosis and removal of the weakened cells by marrow macrophages is the final step in this pathway. Neutrophils from patients with JAGN1 mutations also revealed increased apoptosis59. An aberrant glycosylation of neutrophil proteins (for example, NADPH oxidase) was reported in patients with G6PC3 and SLC37A4 mutations, which led to increased ER stress and apoptosis35,60.
Deregulated transcription factors expression
In addition to neutropenia, the majority of patients with severe congenital neutropenia have increased levels of monocytes and eosinophils (2- to 4-fold above normal)61. Monocytosis could be explained as a compensatory mechanism of innate immunological defense in the absence of neutrophils. It might also be a consequence of the deregulated signalling of the transcription factors that are responsible for the commitment of the myeloid progenitors toward neutrophils or monocytes 62,63. In patients with severe congenital neutropenia, expression of the granulopoiesis-activating protein CCAAT/enhancer binding protein alpha (C/EBPα) is severely diminished and expression of monopoiesis-activating transcription factor PU.1 (PU.1) is unaffected or slightly elevated64,65. Thus, disturbed C/EBPα:PU.1 expression ratio with a strong shift toward PU.1 expression might have a decisive role in the dysregulation of myelopoiesis in severe congenital neutropenia. An increased blood and bone marrow eosinophil counts is also a common finding in severe congenital neutropenia patients61. Constitutive expression of the transcription factor, Inhibitor of DNA binding 1, (Id1) in human hematopoietic cells modestly enhanced neutrophilic differentiation and inhibited eosinophilic development66. G-CSF upregulates Id1 in myeloid progenitor cells of healthy individuals, but not in CN patients. Therefore, defective Id1 expression may cause eosinophilia and may contribute to the lack of neutrophilic granulocytes in CN patients65.
G-CSFR signal transduction
The G-CSF signalling pathway is altered in patients with severe congenital neutropenia due to the mutations in the genes involved in the G-CSF signalling. This explains why therapy with a very high therapeutical dose of G-CSF is effective in most cases. Severe congenital neutropenia patients have no defects in G-CSF production or G-CSFR expression (their serum contains increased G-CSF levels67 and myeloid cells express increased numbers of G-CSFR68). The dysregulation in the G-CSFR signal transduction occurs at the level of effector proteins downstream in the pathway, leading to the severe deregulation of the transcription of genes that promote myeloid cell proliferation or differentiation (Figure 5)65,69-73. The consequence of this altered protein expression profile is diminished or absent neutrophil differentiation.
Figure 5. G-CSFR downstream signalling pathways.

Main intracellular pathways involving key signalling molecules activated upon binding of granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) to G-CSF receptor (G-CSFR). Tyrosine-protein kinase JAK2 (JAK-2), which is hyperactivated in myeloid cells of patients with severe congenital neutropenia69, leads to phosphorylation and activation of the signal transducer and activator of transcription (STAT) 3 and STAT5A, promoting proliferation of haematopoietic stem cells over granulocytic differentiation; sustained activation of STAT5A has been shown in patients with severe congenital neutropenia70. Tyrosine-protein phosphatase non-receptor type 11 (SHP-2) is another component of G-CSF signal transduction; SHP-2 induces dephosphorylation and, thereby, activation of tyrosine-protein kinase Lyn, which in turn in association with another tyrosine kinase Syk phosphorylates and activates haematopoietic lineage cell-specific protein (HCLS1), inducing myeloid differentiation of hematopoietic cells 33,34,71,72. Substantially increased levels of SHP-2 have been observed in neutrophils from patients with severe congenital neutropenia73. In addition, lymphoid enhancer-binding factor 1 (LEF-1) a transcription factor member of the Wnt signalling pathway, is severely diminished in myeloid progenitors of patients with severe congenital neutropenia64. LEF-1 activates the granulocyte-specific transcription factor CCAAT/enhancer binding protein alpha (C/EBPα) and its target genes cyclin D1 and c-MYC, as well as anti-apoptotic factor baculoviral IAP repeat-containing protein 5 (survivin)64. Expression of all these proteins is severely diminished in myeloid cells of patients with severe congenital neutropenia, along with reduced activity of phosphatidylinositol 3-kinases (PI3K), serine/threonine-protein kinases (Akt), HCLS1-associated protein X-1 (HAX-1) and haematopoietic lineage cell-specific protein (HCLS1)33,34. As a consequence G-CSF therapy activates NAMPT and by this the compensatory emergency granulopoiesis pathway: NAMPT converts nicotinamide (NA) into nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide (NAD+), activating NAD+-dependent protein deacetylases, sirtuins (SIRTs), which in turn activate C/EBPβ75. Upregulated pathways are shown in red, downregulated in blue.
Mechanisms of G-CSF therapy
By increasing the stimulation of G-CSFR signalling, G-CSF therapy induces compensatory mechanisms of granulopoiesis in patients with severe congenital neutropenia. The enzyme nicotinamide phosphoribosyltransferase (NAMPT) is necessary for the activation of NAD-dependent protein deacetylase sirtuin-1 (SIRT1), which in turn activates transcription factors C/EBPα and C/EBPβ in healthy individuals. C/EBPα is responsible for steady-state granulopoiesis, whereas C/EBPβ is crucial for “emergency” granulopoiesis74, which is normally required in situations such as infections. In patients with severe congenital neutropenia, G-CSF treatment activates the NAMPT- and SIRT1-induced C/EBPβ-dependent granulopoiesis (Figure 5)75 The levels of NAMPT and SIRT1 were markedly elevated in myeloid cells and in plasma from G-CSF treated patients, as compared to healthy individuals 75.
Interestingly, Nicotinamid (Vitamin B3), the substrate of NAMPT, is capable of increasing the ANC in healthy individuals75 and is considered for clinical use in severe congenital and cyclic neutropenia patients.
Leukaemic progression
Severe congenital neutropenia should be regarded as a preleukaemic condition whereby a substantial proportion of patients develop leukaemia9,16,17,19,76-80, predominantly AML (undifferentiated (M0), myeloblastic (M1) or myelomonocytic (M4), but acute lymphoblastic leukaemia (ALL)81 and chronic myelomonocytic leukaemia (CMML)82 have also been reported. Leukaemic progression is not restricted to patients with ELANE-associated severe congenital neutropenia. In the European branch of the SCNIR, 17 of the 118 patients with ELANE mutations (11%) and 6 of the 41 patients harbouring HAX1 mutations have developed leukaemia (12,7%). Of the 88 patients with Shwachman-Diamond syndrome, 7 developed leukaemia (9%). However, the number of patients in most other genetic subgroups of congenital neutropenias is too small to make any reliable statement about leukaemia risk. Studies on individual patients, regardless of their genotype, including a patient with cyclic neutropenia83, have reported leukaemic progression.
CSF3R mutations
A major risk factor for leukaemogenesis in patients with severe congenital neutropenia is the presence of somatic (acquired) CSF3R mutations (mostly C-to-T nonsense mutations that convert glutamine codons into premature stop codons) that result in the truncation of approximately 100 amino acids of the cytoplasmic domain of G-CSFR (figure 6). Functional studies in murine myeloid cell lines showed that these truncated G-CSFRs blocked G-CSF-induced neutrophil differentiation and maturation in these cell line models84,85. This observation fueled the concept that the membrane-distal C-terminal region of G-CSFRs harbored a “differentiation domain” from which specific differentiation signals emanated84-86. Extended mutation analysis has shed further light on the crucial functions of the G-CSFR C-terminus, which have been reviewed in detail elsewhere87,88. G-CSFR truncation mutants show prolonged half-life at the plasma membrane and, therefore, act dominantly over the wild type receptors89, resulting in an elevated G-CSF-induced proliferative response and sustained activation of STAT5 in myeloid progenitors90,91, which could promote the clonal expansion of hematopoietic stem cells and progenitor cells92.
Figure 6. Dominant action of G-CSFR truncation mutants leads to sustained proliferation and survival signaling.
The native mature G-CSFR protein consists of 836 amino acids, whereas the truncated forms of the CSF3R protein usually vary between 715 and 790 amino acids in length. Truncated G-CSFRs lack the ability to undergo endocytosis, owing to the deletion of a di-leucine motif essential for internalization 154. Furthermore, they are hampered in endosomal trafficking and lysosomal degradation, owing to the loss of (phospho-tyrosine Y729, the binding site of suppressor of cytokine signalling 3 (SOCS3), which mediates ubiquitination of a critical membrane-proximal lysine residue87. G-CSFR forms dimers upon activation by G-CSF. Both wild type G-CSFR homodimers and wild type-truncation mutant G-CSFR heterodimers are subject to normal internalization and lysosomal degradation, whereas the homodimeric truncation mutants accumulate at the plasma membrane. Owing to their prolonged half-life and residence time at the plasma membrane, the G-CSFR truncation mutants act dominantly over the wild type G-CSFR89, resulting in an elevated G-CSF-induced proliferative response and sustained activation of signal transducer and activator of transcription 5A (STAT5A) and phosphatidylinositol 3-kinases (PI3K)- serine/threonine-protein kinases (Akt) in myeloid progenitors90,91. Sustained activation of STAT5 appeared essential for the clonal expansion of haematopoietic stem cells and progenitor cells in mice harbouring the CSF3R-d715 truncation mutation92, whereas prolonged PI-3K-Akt activation resulted in the increased production of intracellular reactive oxygen species (ROS), particularly hydrogen peroxide (H2O2), in murine myeloid progenitors via activation of the NADPH oxidase complex 2 (Ref91). Increased H2O2 levels inactivate oxidation sensitive phosphatases (such as tyrosine-protein phosphatase non-receptor type 1 (PTPN1) and phosphatidylinositol 3,4,5-trisphosphate 3-phosphatase and dual-specificity protein phosphatase PTEN (PTEN)) that might negatively control G-CSF signalling and cause oxidative damage to proteins, lipids and nucleotides.
The presence of acquired CSF3R nonsense truncating mutations has been shown in the leukaemic haematopoietic clones of patients with severe congenital neutropenia who progress to MDS or AML89,93,94,95. The frequency of CSF3R mutations in patients with severe congenital neutropenia was estimated at around 30-35% in the non-leukaemic patients, compared with approximately 80% in those who also had AML or MDS, supporting the association between the acquisition of CSF3R mutations and leukaemic transformation78. Importantly, multiple haematopoietic clones with distinct CSF3R mutations frequenlty coexist in the same patient, indicating a strong selective pressure favouring the expansion of such clones78. The time between the first detection of clones with CSF3R mutations and signs of malignant transformation is highly variable: some patients progressed to MDS or AML within a few months78,95, whereas others did not develop leukaemia for many years, even if they had high numbers of mutated haematopoietic clones, indicating that additional cooperating events are involved in malignant transformation78,96-99.
A crucial question that emerged from the discovery of hematopoietic clones harboring somatic CSF3R mutations was whether, and if so how, G-CSF treatment has an effect on the proliferation of such clones. Data from long-term follow-up studies of patients with severe congenital neutropenia (in whom CSF3R mutant clones were detected receiving G-CSF indicated that the percentage of CSF3R mutant clones did not systematically increase, and sometimes even temporarily declined during G-CSF treatment78,97. However, this decline does not necessarily mean that these clones have disappeared entirely, as it might simply be a matter of the sensitivity of detection method. Recently, next-generation deep sequencing has been established as a highly sensitive analysis technology that enables detection of haematopoietic stem cells clones harbouring CSF3R mutations that occur with a frequency <1%97,98. We have hypothesized that if one of these clones is hit by a second leukemia-associated mutations, it will acquire a proliferative advantage that would ultimately lead to overt leukaemia97,98.
Acquisition of a second leukaemia-associated mutation
In a collaborative study involving patients from different registries, the patterns of acquisition of leukaemia-associated mutations in haematopoietic stem cell clones were investigated using next-generation sequencing97,98. Of the 31 patients who had progressed to MDS or AML, 20 (64.5%) had clones with mutations in RUNX1 and these mutations mostly occurred in clones which had already acquired CSF3R mutations. This pattern was seen in severe congenital neutropenia associated with mutations in ELANE, HAX1, G6PT, GFI1 and WAS97.
The time course between acquisition of one or more leukemia-associated mutations and development of leukaemia varies considerably96,97. Thus, CSF3R and RUNX1 mutation analyses cannot be used for diagnostic purposes, but can be helpful to screen for the risk of malignant transformation. The presence of these mutations is a strong predictor of later leukemic development and, therefore, should result in a more intensive diagnostic monitoring to evaluate the growth of pre-leukaemic cell clones. Screening for CSF3R, RUNX1 and other (less frequent) mutations associated with secondary malignancies, such as mutations in ASXL1, SUZ12, EP300, FIZ1 internal tandem duplication and NPM1, is advised96,97. The high frequency of cooperating RUNX1 and CSF3R mutations in patients with severe congenital neutropenia suggests a novel and unique molecular pathway of leukaemogenesis, not seen thus far in any other type of adult or paediatric malignancy97 (Figure 7). Independent from the genetic subtypes, leukaemic progression in patients with severe congenital neutropenia is often preceded by one or more chromosomal abnormalities, such as monosomy 7 and trisomy 2197.
Figure 7. Model of leukaemogenesis in severe congenital neutropenia.
The development of leukaemia is a multistep process characterized by a series of genetic changes that predispone haematopoietic cells with inherited severe congenital neutropenia-associated mutations to malignant transformation. Prolonged exposure of these cells to high dosages of G-CSF might result in the acquisition of CSF3R mutations that generate truncated G-CSFRs, thereby leading to hypersensitivity to G-CSF, defective G-CSFR signal transduction and clonal proliferation. Subsequently, the acquisition of additional leukemia-associated mutations (for example in RUNX1) or chromosomal aberrations, such as trisomy 21 and monosomy 7, ultimately lead to leukaemogenic transformation97.
Diagnosis, screening and prevention
Diagnosis
Presenting signs and symptoms
Severe congenital neutropenia is usually diagnosed by early childhood. In neonates, a diagnostic clue could be an acute and severe umbilical infection, which can occur within the first days of life. During the first weeks of life, the child might begin to have fevers associated with respiratory symptoms, including signs of pneumonia13. A few weeks or months later cellulitis or deep tissue abscesses might present. Severe gingivitis and periodontitis (Figure 8) can develop within the first two years100.
Figure 8. Severe gingivitis and periodontitis in patients with severe congenital neutropenia.

Photographs of buccal cavities of two patients with severe congenital neutropenia caused by ELANE mutations show hypertrophic inflamed reddened gingiva and periodontitis. Peridontitis is common in severe congenital neutropenia patients155.
There are often long delays between the first symptoms and the confirmation of the diagnosis. Children presenting with fever and symptoms of a respiratory or skin infection do not routinely receive a white blood cell count with differential count to discover neutropenia, in most cases these common problems are not caused by severe congenital neutropenia. Furthermore, neutropenia in early childhood is commonly an autoimmune disorder 101,102, which usually remits spontaneously over the first 3 or 4 years of life, so low ANCs is often dismissed as unconcerning. Early diagnosis of severe congenital neutropenia depends upon a skillful clinician recognizing that recurrent fevers and infections suggest an underlying haematological or immunological problem. The most relevant clue often is that the patient is more severely ill than it would be expected. Recurrent and painful mouth sores or teeth or gums problems are other important clues to prompt blood cell counts (Figure 8).
When neutropenia is one of the manifestations of a syndrome (Tables 1 and 2), the other features, such as organ failures, diarrhoea, malabsorption, failure to thrive etc., are often recognized first and the diagnosis of severe congenital neutropenia follows. It cannot be over emphasized that a careful physical examination is the critical starting point for the diagnosis of severe congenital neutropenia. In addition, the family history is extremely important to determine whether there are multiple persons in the same family with the same or similar medical problems and if the patient's parents are consanguineous.
Blood neutrophil counts
Patients with severe congenital neutropenia have chronically reduced ANCs, but the blood counts are first measured when the patient has a fever and infections, and, therefore, in this occasion the ANC might be a little higher or even lower than it would be usual for this specific patient. The stress of inflammation might mobilize all of the available neutrophils from the bone marrow reserves, thereby raising the ANC, but the stress of infection could also exhaust the supply, thereby leading to a more-extreme degree of neutropenia. For instance, ANCs > 0.5 × 109/L without G-CSF treatment are quite rarely seen in patients with severe congenital neutropenia not even during infection due to mutations in ELANE, HAXI or G6PC3 13,14,35, whereas patients with autoimmune neutropenia can have ANCs > 1.0 × 109/L during bacterial infections101. Patients with SBDS mutations might initially have normal ANCs that would drop to second over time103. For these reasons, it is very helpful to obtain a series of blood counts once or twice a week for 2-3 weeks in patients suspected of having severe congenital neutropenia.
Bone marrow examination
If severe congenital neutropenia is suspected, bone marrow examination is useful as an early step in diagnosis. At the initial examination, biopsies as well as aspirates are helpful to rule out (or confirm) leukaemia, aplastic anemia or myelodysplasia. Typical findings in the bone marrow of patients with severe congenital neutropenia are elevated numbers of promyelocytes and myelocytes and a paucity of metamyelocytes, band cells and mature neutrophils104, indicating maturation arrest of granulopoiesis. Quantitatively, the bone marrow can be described with the myeloid to erythroid cell ratio and the immature to mature myeloid cell ratio. To obtain results that are representative of the baseline conditions, it is important to do the bone marrow examination when the patient is in a reasonably stable condition (that is, after treatment is given for an acute infection). In most patients, the morphology of the myeloid cells is not indicative of the cause of neutropenia104. Cytogenetics tests to exclude chromosomal aberrations are done on the initial bone marrow sample, although the result is almost always normal at the time of diagnosis. It is very useful to save some unstained slides and a frozen sample of the patient's bone marrow cells for future testing, whenever possible.
Genetic analyses
The pattern of inheritance can assist in confirming the diagnosis. For example, autosomal dominant mutations in ELANE20-22 are the most common cause of cyclic neutropenia and severe congenital neutropenia. (Table 1, Box 1) Mutations in ELANE should be suspected and might be recognized in the first months of life if a child is ill and a family member already has the diagnosis of severe congenital neutropenia associated with ELANE mutations. On the other hand, the diseases inherited in a recessive manner, for example, severe congenital neutropenia due to mutations in HAX130, G6PC335, JAGN159 or SBDS37 among others, are usually recognized as the first case in a family. Severe congenital neutropenias associated with mutations in TAZ36 (which cause Barth syndrome) or WAS105 have X-linked inheritance.
Box 1. Cyclic neutropenia.
Cyclic neutropenia (a type of congenital neutropenia, is an autosomal dominant disorder that is characterized by oscillating levels of blood neutrophils, monocytes, platelets, reticulocytes and lymphocytes, usually with a 21-day periodicity12,134,135,136,137. Family studies later confirmed the inheritance pattern and the absence of associated hematological and non-hematological malignancies138. Mutations in ELANE can cause both cyclic neutropenia and other types of severe congenital neutropenia21,23 and, although there is some overlap, genotype-phenotype correlations indicate that there is a cluster of mutations that are more likely to be associated with cyclic neutropenia22,23,24. Cyclic neutropenia has a lower risk of evolution to myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) and acute myeloid leukaemia (AML) and milder morbidity23. However, when neutrophil counts are at the lowest point, patients regularly have painful mouth ulcers, respiratory symptoms, cellulitis, abscesses and severe, even fatal, infections12.
The central pathophysiological mechanism of cyclic neutropenia is failure of the bone marrow to maintain a consistent production of mature neutrophils20,21,139. When granulocytopoiesis stops, early myeloid progenitors accumulate, then leave the bone marrow and can be observed in the blood. Severe neutropenia recurs when the bone marrow supply is exhausted. This process then repeats regularly. Researchers have puzzled over the mechanisms of the cycling of neutrophils; several mathematicians have proposed explanations139-145. The first model, by Michael Mackey, postulates that the production of neutrophils is governed by long-range stimulatory factors in a long feedback loop that has a built-in time delay in the maturation of promyelocytes to fully differentiated neutrophils. Cell loss early in this process (at the promyelocyte stage) would be associated with oscillations in blood neutrophil counts143,144,145. Furthermore, if such cell loss were very severe, there might be no apparent oscillations, because neutrophil counts would remain continuously extremely low. Intriguingly, G-CSF treatment in patients with cyclic neutropenia does not abrogate cycling, but increases ANC, shortens the cycle periodicity from the usual 21 days to about 14 days and prevents serious infections12.
Genetic testing is playing an increasingly central role in diagnosing severe congenital neutropenia. Germline mutations can be identified by DNA sequencing of blood, saliva or another tissue samples. Clinical clues pointing to a syndrome matching the patient's presentation can help to determine which gene should be tested first (Table 1). For instance, in an infant with neutropenia who also presents gastrointestinal symptoms, short stature and failure to thrive (common manifestations of Shwachman-Diamond syndrome) SBDS should be sequenced. Similarly, a young boy with neutropenia, shortness of breath and symptoms of heart failure (indications of Barth syndrome) should first have TAZ sequenced first or a patient with severe neutropenia, urogenital or heart deformities should be sequenced for G6PC3.
When there are no congenital organ anomalies or other clinical clues, the standard approach for children who present with severe neutropenia and whose bone marrow examination shows maturation arrest is sequencing candidate genes that have been associated with severe congenital neutropenia. It is reasonable to sequence ELANE first, as it is the most common mutation. Because ELANE mutations can cause severe congenital neutropenia or cyclic neutropenia22,23,24 sequential blood counts at regular intervals, best every day or ever other day, are needed to make the diagnosis of cyclic neutropenia with greatest confidence. If a heterozygous mutation in ELANE is found, most clinicians do no further genetic testing. If ELANE sequencing is negative, other individual genes could be analysed, based on family history and available resources. In consanguineous families, search for autosomal recessive mutations would be recommended (starting with HAX1). If these tests are also negative, sequencing of a panel of neutropenia-associated genes or whole exome sequencing would be recommended. The panel sequencing approach is being used increasingly as first choice and could be ultimately less expensive and more-informative, as it can also uncover multi-gene mutations.104
Genetic testing is becoming increasingly precise, but the mechanisms whereby the mutated protein causes the patient's specific disease features are still poorly understood. Different neutropenia-associated ELANE mutations have consequences of different severity16,17. Longitudinal records of the SCNIR show that no cases of MDS or AML have occurred in patients with some specific ELANE mutations in many patient-years of observation23, and careful statistical analysis shows highly significant genotype-phenotype correlations for these mutations.23 It should not be surprising that mutations associated with more-benign phenotypes are prevalent. Longitudinal follow-up of patients to determine the clinical significance and prognostic importance of specific neutropenia-associated mutations is a vital function of patient registries.
A common problem with genetic diagnosis is the finding of novel variants of unknown clinical significance. An initial step to determine the significance of the genetic variant is to map it through an extensive family study, to rule out family segregation. Whole exome sequencing would be a reasonable next step, if available, using global databases as control to identify common non-pathogenic variants; this approach can lead to the discovery of new causes for neutropenia.106 It is usually best to review genetic findings in light of a registry and repository focused on the neutropenia-causing genes. In the European branch of the SCNIR, in 22 % (118/537) of the registered patients a genetic diagnosis could not be obtained.
Immunological diagnostics
Young children with neutropenia are commonly tested for anti-neutrophil auto-antibodies101. These tests are useful to support a suspected diagnosis of autoimmune neutropenia, but they are not definitive. In a substantial proportion, probably at least one-third, of children with presumed autoimmune neutropenia, test results are negative even with repeated testing. Anti-neutrophil antibodies have also been reported in patients with severe congenital neutropenia. 107, 108.
When evaluating patients presenting with fever, infections and neutropenia, it is good practice to take an initially broad approach to assess the immunological status: lymphocyte counts, lymphocytes subsets numbers and immunoglobulin levels should be measured. Most patients with severe congenital neutropenia have normal or even elevated lymphocyte counts61, increased blood monocyte counts61 and normal or increased immunoglobulin levels, whereas patients with immunodeficiency syndromes usually also have lymphocytopenia and immunoglobulin deficiencies, and they might have severe neutropenia. Warts, hypogammaglobulinemia, infections and myelokathexis (WHIM) syndrome is a unique condition that should be considered in patients with warts, severe lymphocytopenia and severe neutropenia, who often have a total white cell count < 1.0 × 109/L.
Screening
It is not routine practice to perform blood cell counts in infants at birth or in the first week of life. The incidence of severe congenital neutropenias is considered too low to justify this practice. Blood counts are not routinely done when children present with febrile illnesses either, again because these illnesses are common in the general population.
Prevention
Prevention of these genetic disorders is challenging. Genetic counseling that clearly presents all the options for diagnosis and management is the mainstays for excellent care, and the body of evidence on which couselling is based is rapidly evolving. Prenatal genetic diagnosis (through amniocentesis) is possible for the autosomal dominant disorders, whereas, for the recessive disorders, DNA sequencing of the potential parents in addition to genetic counselling might help parents understand the risk of having affected offspring. Genetic testing should also be offered to relatives of patients with recessive disorders, especially if they are eligible as a HSC donor for the affected family member.
Another important aspect is prevention of the consequences of neutropenia. In addition to early G-CSF treatment, maintaining excellent oral hygiene, good nutritional status and healthy living patterns can help reduce the risk of infections, whereas there is no substantial evidence supporting the benefit of prophylactic antibiotics. The use of myeloid growth factors is a preventive strategy (see below). As discussed, the risk of leukaemic transformation can be managed with regular screening for somatic mutations or karyotype anomalies.
Management
Initiation of G-CSF therapy at diagnosis
G-CSF is the first choice treatment in almost all patients with severe congenital neutropenia or cyclic neutropenia (Figure 9), who require G-CSF treatment to achieve and maintain blood ANCs > 1.0 × 109/L11-14. In general, at the beginning of treatment, G-CSF is given daily subcutaneously; by starting with a low (1–3 μg/kg per day) or moderate dose (5 μg/kg per day) in patients with cyclic neutropenia or severe congenital neutropenia, respectively, the adverse effects (bone pain, headache and myalgias) can be generally avoided. The dose is gradually increased in some patients at about 10-14 day intervals until the patient consistently maintains an ANC >1 × 109/L 100, a threshold that is usually sufficient to ameliorate the symptoms. The genetic subtype does not correlate with the G-CSF dose needed to raise the ANC to this level109. G-CSF treated patients should receive blood counts at least several times per year to assure proper treatment. The patient is considered a “non-responder” at G-CSF dosages >50 μg/kg per day and ANCs < 0.5 × 109/L, but some experts use a lower threshold (25 μg/kg per day) for defining a non-responder or poor responder www.depts.washington.edu/registry110 and www.scnir.org111 These patients should be at least considered as candidates for haematopoietic stem cell transplantation, based on data of the SCNIR111. G-CSF is most effective as a preventative treatment, but patients with severe congenital neutropenia presenting with infections should start receiving a combination of G-CSF and antibiotics as soon as possible.
Figure 9. Algorithm for the management of patients with severe congenital neutropenia based on response to granulocyte-colony stimulating factor therapy.
More than 90% of patients with severe congenital neutropenia respond well to the G-CSF treatment and reach a sustained absolute neutrophil count >1.0 × 109/L. G-CSF, granulocyte-colony stimulating factor; AML, acute myeloid leukaemia; MDS, myelodysplastic syndrome, abnormalities typical of AML or MDS: trisomy 21, monosomy 7, typical BM morphology.
Long-term management
Because of the variety of genetic subtypes of severe congenital neutropenia, most with additional clinical features (Tables 1 and 2), the long-term management of patients usually requires the cooperation of a team of specialists who see the patient on a regular basis. G-CSF therapy can correct the neutropenia in Shwachman-Diamond syndrome and Barth syndrome but it does not alter most of the other manifestations of these conditions.
Most patients on G-CSF treatment can maintain a normal or near normal ANC, but they may still experience some infections and develop gingivitis and periodontitis. Failure to comply with the need for continuous treatment is the most common reason for treatment failures. Consistent dental care is particularly important because once the integrity of the dental-gingival barrier to prevent bacterial penetration below the border of the enamel is destroyed it usually does not recover. Periodontal disease then develops and can last for a lifetime. G-CSF treatment can reverse the quantitative deficiency of neutrophils, but the full functions of these cells in patients with severe congenital neutropenia may not be completely restored. Neutrophils from patients have shown defective generation of oxygen radicals and reduced in vitro chemotaxis.112 CYBB, a gene coding for a key component of NADPH-oxidase, is downregulated in patients with severe congenital neutropenia113. Neutrophil dysfunction could also be due to specific defects in the neutrophils bactericidal proteins (for example, deficient antibacterial peptide LL-37)114-117. However, G-CSF treatment has many effects to enhance the functions of neutrophils. It primes the metabolic burst associated with phagocytosis and stimulates production of a number of neutrophil antibacterial proteins, and thereby mediate a net increase in the functional activity of neutrophils.118
The risk of long-term haematological complications, such as the risk of developing AML or MDS, varies considerably across the spectrum of genetic aetiologies of severe congenital neutropenia. The specific risk for each gene or mutation is difficult to determine, because the number of known cases worldwide is too small and the duration of follow-up is too short to draw strong conclusions. In patients (both children and adults) with subtypes with a known high risk, (for example, mutations in ELANE, HAX1 or SBDS), monitoring with annual bone marrow evaluations including cytogenetic analyses and CSF3R mutational screenings is recommended110,111. As karyotype aberrations or leukemia associated mutations such as Runx1 occur prior to leukaemia97, their detection might suggest to initiate bone marrow transplantation before overt leukaemia develops.
The development of early-onset osteopenia and osteoporosis has been reported in approximately 40% of patients with severe congenital neutropenia, based on bone density measurements119. The underlying pathological mechanisms are still unclear, and fortunately fractures are very infrequent events. The development of osteopenia and osteoporosis appears independent from the underlying genetic defect, but further genotype-phenotype correlation analyses are required.
Stem cell transplantation
Owing to the efficacy of G-CSF therapy, haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) is no longer essential for saving the lives of patients with severe congenital neutropenia. However, there are two conditions in which HSCT is the only currently available treatment option: patients who do not respond to G-CSF treatment120,121-123 and patients who develop AML or MDS120. In the former case, following successful transplantation, patients normalize their peripheral blood counts and do not require further G-CSF treatment. Deciding when the optimal time point for HSCT is in patients who do not respond to G-CSF is very difficult, as HSCT could still be too toxic to be recommend in some patients. In the case of patients who develop MDS or AML, the chances of survival are dramatically reduced without HSCT. Before 2000, all patients who received standard chemotherapy for AML without HSCT died, and those treated with chemotherapy followed by HSCT had very poor outcomes: most succumbed from transplant-related infectious complications, for example fungal infections and graft versus host disease120. Since 2001, only mild chemotherapy instead of standard chemotherapy are used to lower the leukemic blast load followed by conditioning for HSCT. Therefore, prognosis for these patients has improved substantially, primarily owing to the practice of anticipating HSCT when possible (for example, as soon as the patient develops AML or MDS, without waiting for progression to AML)124, avoiding anti-leukaemic chemotherapy prior to HSCT and modifications in the preparative regimens. Low-dose ara-C and thioguanine can be used to reduce peripheral blast counts and treat organomegaly. Chemotherapy regimens similar to those used to treat AML are only warranted in patients who do not respond to this milder treatment and have peripheral blast counts that cannot be maintained below 5 × 109/L or who have a rapidly progressing disease or organ involvements – especially pulmonary involvement. The improved evaluation of the HSC donor might also play a part.
Regardless of the reason for HSCT, 5-year survival is approximately 80% for patient enrolled in the European branch of the SCNIR124. However, HSCT-related morbidity owing to acute or chronic graft versus host disease, bacterial or viral infections and the increased risk for AML and secondary malignancies after chemotherapy or irradiation are still major risks to be considered. With current transplant regimens, the AML relapse rate is low: in an analysis of 136 patients by the European Bone Marrow Transplant group, 3-year event free survival was 71% overall121. Of note, the authors of this study state that “in a precancerous disease like congenital neutropenia full donor chimerism (all hematopoietic cells are donor derived) is very important to achieve in order to prevent the re-emergence of predisposed clones121.”
Pregnancy
The number of patients with severe congenital neutropenia who reach adulthood and wish to have children is increasing. Based on two observational studies, administration of G-CSF throughout pregnancy is safe and well tolerated125,126. No noticeable adverse effects have been reported. No major differences in pregnancy outcome, complications in the newborn baby and infections in the mother were seen between treated and untreated women125. Thus, continuation of G-CSF treatment throughout pregnancy in women with severe congenital neutropenia is recommended.
Quality of life
The availability of G-CSF therapy drastically changed the quality of life for patients with severe chronic neutropenia and their families127. Both life expectancy and the ability to participate in normal life activities improved substantially, owing to decreased risk and fear of dying from infections. The majority of children with severe congenital neutropenia and stable ANCs have no physical limitations that prevent them from participating in all aspects of daily life, such as attending kindergarten or school, practicing sports, meeting with friends, etc 110,111. (Bolyard AA et al, http://www.depts.washington.edu/registry, Understanding severe chronic neutropenia: A handbook for patients and their families. February 2010.)110 Regardless of their genetic subtype, the majority of patients with severe congenital neutropenia now reach adulthood110.111. Many patients desire family planning, and are prepared to accept the substantial risk of transmitting the neutropenia-causing mutation to their offspring. Most adults are in good conditions with long-term G-CSF treatment, but data is limited so far to about 25 years of G-CSF injections. The risk of developing a haematological malignancy at any time can negatively influence quality of life. However, with improving long-term survival and decreasing transplant related morbidity, outcomes for stem cell transplantation are steadily improving120,121,124.
Outlook
Since the late 1980s11, substantial progress has been made in the diagnosis, understanding of the molecular and genetic heterogeneity, pathophysiology and treatment. Early detection of severe congenital neutropenia already in the first months of life, G-CSF therapy and HSCT have contributed to survival rates of >80%. However, regular genetic screening is needed to detect and monitor the molecular events associated with leukaemogenesis128.
To reduce the risk of leukemogenesis, treatment strategies using low dose or no G-CSF need to be investigated. In inducible pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs) obtained from patients harboring ELANE mutations, the neutrophil elastase inhibitor sivelestat promotes the differentiation of promyelocytes into mature neutrophils129 (although the mechanism is still unclear). Thus, sivelestat could be an alternative or adjuvant treatment. Furthermore, the use of nicotinamide (Vitamin B3) in addition to G-CSF treatment to stimulate emergency granulopoiesis by activating the NAMPT/SIRT pathway75 might enable to reduce G-CSF dosages and, therefore, reduce the risk of acquisition of CSF3R mutations and leukemogenesis.
iPSCs have been generated from somatic cells of patients with either ELANE or HAX1 mutations129-131. With the establishment of efficient protocols for in vitro haematopoietic and myeloid differentiation of iPSCs cells132,133, these cells could be used as an experimental model to study the pathophysiology of disease. Successful restoration of defective granulopoiesis in vitro has been achieved by lentivirus- or CRISPR/Cas9-based correction of mutated ELANE or HAX1 in iPSCs129-131. Thus, correction of the underlying gene mutation ex vivo with the CRISPR/Cas9 technology followed by autologous stem cell transplantation is a promising future therapeutic option.
The discovery of > 20 mutated neutropenia-causing genes responsible for severe congenital neutropenia within the last 20 years was only possible owing to the improvement of next-generation sequencing technologies. However, in a substantial number of patients with severe congenital neutropenia no mutations could be detected so far. Careful anamnestic inquiries, genetic counselling and tailored next-generation sequencing and bioinformatic analysis might help to detect mutations in these patients, especially in those who acquired CSF3R mutation, as this event is exclusive of severe congenital neutropenia and, therefore, a further confirmation of the diagnosis.
Acknowledgments
This manuscript is dedicated to the late Dr. Laurence Boxer, a pioneer of neutropenia research.
The work was supported by grants from National Institute of Health (NIH), Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG), Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung (BMBF), Deutsche Jose-Carreras Leukämie-Stiftung e.V., Amgen Foundation.
Footnotes
Competing interests: D.C.D. is a consultant and receives research support from Amgen; Inc., a manufacturer of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) used to treat neutropenia. All other authors declare no competing interests.
Author contributions: Introduction (K.W. and D.C.D.); Epidemiology (D.C.D., J.S.); Mechanisms/pathophysiology (J.S., I.P.T. and K.W.); Diagnosis, screening and prevention (D.C.D., K.W. and J.S.); Management (C.Z., K.W. and J.S.); Quality of life (C.Z. and K.W.); Outlook (K.W.); Overview of the Primer (K.W.)
References
- 1.Welte K, Zeidler C, Dale DC. Severe congenital neutropenia. Semin Hematol. 2006;43:189–195. doi: 10.1053/j.seminhematol.2006.04.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Skokowa J, Germeshausen M, Zeidler C, Welte K. Severe congenital neutropenia: inheritance and pathophysiology. Curr Opin Hematol. 2007;14:22–28. doi: 10.1097/00062752-200701000-00006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Donadieu J, Beaupain B, Mahlaoui N, Bellanne-Chantelot C. Epidemiology of congenital neutropenia. Hematol Oncol Clin North Am. 2013;27:1–17. doi: 10.1016/j.hoc.2012.11.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Carlsson G, et al. Incidence of severe congenital neutropenia in Sweden and risk of evolution to myelodysplastic syndrome/leukaemia. Br J Haematol. 2012;158:363–369. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2141.2012.09171.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Lebel A, Yacobovich J, Krasnov T, et al. Genetic analysis and clinical picture of severe congenital neutropenia in Israel. Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2015;62:103–108. doi: 10.1002/pbc.25251. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Grann VR, et al. Duffy (Fy), DARC, and neutropenia among women from the United States, Europe and the Caribbean. Br J Haematol. 2008;143:288–293. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2141.2008.07335.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Denic S, et al. Prevalence of neutropenia in children by nationality. BMC Hematol. 2016;16:15. doi: 10.1186/s12878-016-0054-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Chown G, Gelfand AS. Agranulocytosis. Can Med Assoc J. 1933;29:128–134. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Gilman PA, Jackson DP, Guild HG. Congenital agranulocytosis: prolonged survival and terminal acute leukemia. Blood. 1970;36:576–585. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Souza LM, et al. Recombinant human granulocyte colony-stimulating factor: effects on normal and leukemic myeloid cells. Science. 1986;232:61–65. doi: 10.1126/science.2420009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Bonilla MA, et al. Effects of recombinant human granulocyte colony-stimulating factor on neutropenia in patients with congenital agranulocytosis. N Engl J Med. 1989;320:1574–1580. doi: 10.1056/NEJM198906153202402. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Hammond WP, Price TH, Souza LM, Dale DC. Treatment of cyclic neutropenia with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor. N Engl J Med. 1989;320:1306–1311. doi: 10.1056/NEJM198905183202003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Welte K, et al. Differential effects of granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor in children with severe congenital neutropenia. Blood. 1990;75:1056–1063. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Dale DC, et al. A randomized controlled phase III trial of recombinant human granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (filgrastim) for treatment of severe chronic neutropenia. Blood. 1993;81:2496–2502. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Donadieu J, Fenneteau O, Beaupain B, Mahlaoui N, Chantelot CB. Congenital neutropenia: diagnosis, molecular bases and patient management. Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2011;6:26. doi: 10.1186/1750-1172-6-26. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Rosenberg PS, et al. Stable long-term risk of leukaemia in patients with severe congenital neutropenia maintained on G-CSF therapy. Br J Haematol. 2010;150:196–199. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2141.2010.08216.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Rosenberg PS, et al. The incidence of leukemia and mortality from sepsis in patients with severe congenital neutropenia receiving long-term G-CSF therapy. Blood. 2006;107:4628–4635. doi: 10.1182/blood-2005-11-4370. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Rigaud C, et al. Natural history of Barth syndrome: a national cohort study of 22 patients. Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2013;8:70. doi: 10.1186/1750-1172-8-70. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Donadieu J, et al. Analysis of risk factors for myelodysplasias, leukemias and death from infection among patients with congenital neutropenia. Experience of the French Severe Chronic Neutropenia Study Group. Haematologica. 2005;90:45–53. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Horwitz M, Benson KF, Person RE, Aprikyan AG, Dale DC. Mutations in ELA2, encoding neutrophil elastase, define a 21-day biological clock in cyclic haematopoiesis. Nat Genet. 1999;23:433–436. doi: 10.1038/70544. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Dale DC, et al. Mutations in the gene encoding neutrophil elastase in congenital and cyclic neutropenia. Blood. 2000;96:2317–2322. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Horwitz MS, et al. Neutrophil elastase in cyclic and severe congenital neutropenia. Blood. 2007;109:1817–1824. doi: 10.1182/blood-2006-08-019166. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Makaryan V, et al. The diversity of mutations and clinical outcomes for ELANE-associated neutropenia. Curr OpinHematol. 2015;22:3–11. doi: 10.1097/MOH.0000000000000105. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Germeshausen M, et al. The spectrum of ELANE mutations and their implications in severe congenital and cyclic neutropenia. Hum Mutat. 2013;34:905–914. doi: 10.1002/humu.22308. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Newburger PE, et al. Cyclic neutropenia and severe congenital neutropenia in patients with a shared ELANE mutation and paternal haplotype: evidence for phenotype determination by modifying genes. Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2010;55:314–317. doi: 10.1002/pbc.22537. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Boxer LA, Stein S, Buckley D, Bolyard AA, Dale DC. Strong evidence for autosomal dominant inheritance of severe congenital neutropenia associated with ELA2 mutations. J Pediatr. 2006;148:633–636. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2005.12.029. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Germeshausen M, Schulze H, Ballmaier M, Zeidler C, Welte K. Mutations in the gene encoding neutrophil elastase (ELA2) are not sufficient to cause the phenotype of congenital neutropenia. Br J Haematol. 2001;115:222–224. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2141.2001.03069.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Benson KF, Horwitz M. Possibility of somatic mosaicism of ELA2 mutation overlooked in an asymptomatic father transmitting severe congenital neutropenia to two offspring. Br JHaematol. 2002;118:923. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2141.2002.03631_3.x. author reply 932-924. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Kostmann R. Infantile genetic agranulocytosis; agranulocytosis infantilis hereditaria. Acta Paediatr Suppl. 1956;45:1–78. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Klein C, et al. HAX1 deficiency causes autosomal recessive severe congenital neutropenia (Kostmann disease) Nat Genet. 2007;39:86–92. doi: 10.1038/ng1940. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Germeshausen M, et al. Novel HAX1 mutations in patients with severe congenital neutropenia reveal isoform-dependent genotype-phenotype associations. Blood. 2008;111:4954–4957. doi: 10.1182/blood-2007-11-120667. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Matsubara K, et al. Severe developmental delay and epilepsy in a Japanese patient with severe congenital neutropenia due to HAX1 deficiency. Haematologica. 2007;92:e123–125. doi: 10.3324/haematol.11973. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Skokowa J, et al. Interactions among HCLS1, HAX1 and LEF-1 proteins are essential for G-CSF-triggered granulopoiesis. Nat Med. 2012;18:1550–1559. doi: 10.1038/nm.2958. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Skokowa J, Welte K. Defective G-CSFR signaling pathways in congenital neutropenia. Hematol Oncol Clin North Am. 2013;27:75–88. doi: 10.1016/j.hoc.2012.11.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Boztug K, et al. A syndrome with congenital neutropenia and mutations in G6PC3. N Engl J Med. 2009;360:32–43. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0805051. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Bione S, et al. A novel X-linked gene, G4.5. is responsible for Barth syndrome. Nat Genet. 1996;12:385–389. doi: 10.1038/ng0496-385. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Boocock GR, et al. Mutations in SBDS are associated with Shwachman-Diamond syndrome. Nat Genet. 2003;33:97–101. doi: 10.1038/ng1062. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Bohn G, et al. A novel human primary immunodeficiency syndrome caused by deficiency of the endosomal adaptor protein p14. Nat Med. 2007;13:38–45. doi: 10.1038/nm1528. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Menasche G, et al. Mutations in RAB27A cause Griscelli syndrome associated with haemophagocytic syndrome. Nat Genet. 2000;25:173–176. doi: 10.1038/76024. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Marcolongo P, et al. Structure and mutation analysis of the glycogen storage disease type 1b gene. FEBS Lett. 1998;436:247–250. doi: 10.1016/s0014-5793(98)01129-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Veiga-da-Cunha M, et al. A gene on chromosome 11q23 coding for a putative glucose- 6-phosphate translocase is mutated in glycogen-storage disease types Ib and Ic. Am J Hum Genet. 1998;63:976–983. doi: 10.1086/302068. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Germeshausen M, et al. Digenic mutations in severe congenital neutropenia. Haematologica. 2010;95:1207–1210. doi: 10.3324/haematol.2009.017665. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Klimiankou M, et al. GM-CSF stimulates granulopoiesis in a congenital neutropenia patient with loss-of-function biallelic heterozygous CSF3R mutations. Blood. 2015;126:1865–1867. doi: 10.1182/blood-2015-07-661264. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Ward AC, et al. Novel point mutation in the extracellular domain of the granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) receptor in a case of severe congenital neutropenia hyporesponsive to G-CSF treatment. J Exp Med. 1999;190:497–507. doi: 10.1084/jem.190.4.497. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Triot A, et al. Inherited biallelic CSF3R mutations in severe congenital neutropenia. Blood. 2014;123:3811–3817. doi: 10.1182/blood-2013-11-535419. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Li FQ, Horwitz M. Characterization of mutant neutrophil elastase in severe congenital neutropenia. J Biol Chem. 2001;276:14230–14241. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M010279200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Aprikyan AA, et al. Cellular and molecular abnormalities in severe congenital neutropenia predisposing to leukemia. Exp Hematol. 2003;31:372–381. doi: 10.1016/s0301-472x(03)00048-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Tidwell T, et al. Neutropenia-associated ELANE mutations disrupting translation initiation produce novel neutrophil elastase isoforms. Blood. 2014;123:562–569. doi: 10.1182/blood-2013-07-513242. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Grenda DS, et al. Mutations of the ELA2 gene found in patients with severe congenital neutropenia induce the unfolded protein response and cellular apoptosis. Blood. 2007;110:4179–4187. doi: 10.1182/blood-2006-11-057299. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Nanua S, et al. Activation of the unfolded protein response is associated with impaired granulopoiesis in transgenic mice expressing mutant Elane. Blood. 2011;117:3539–3547. doi: 10.1182/blood-2010-10-311704. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Kollner I, et al. Mutations in neutrophil elastase causing congenital neutropenia lead to cytoplasmic protein accumulation and induction of the unfolded protein response. Blood. 2006;108:493–500. doi: 10.1182/blood-2005-11-4689. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Nustede R, et al. ELANE mutant-specific activation of different UPR pathways in congenital neutropenia. Br J Haematol. 2016;172:219–227. doi: 10.1111/bjh.13823. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Skokowa J, Fobiwe JP, Dan L, Thakur BK, Welte K. Neutrophil elastase is severely down-regulated in severe congenital neutropenia independent of ELA2 or HAX1 mutations but dependent on LEF-1. Blood. 2009;114:3044–3051. doi: 10.1182/blood-2008-11-188755. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Kawaguchi H, et al. Dysregulation of transcriptions in primary granule constituents during myeloid proliferation and differentiation in patients with severe congenital neutropenia. J Leukoc Biol. 2003;73:225–234. doi: 10.1189/jlb.0902427. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Klimenkova O, et al. A lack of secretory leukocyte protease inhibitor (SLPI) causes defects in granulocytic differentiation. Blood. 2014;123:1239–1249. doi: 10.1182/blood-2013-06-508887. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Carlsson G, et al. Kostmann syndrome: severe congenital neutropenia associated with defective expression of Bcl-2, constitutive mitochondrial release of cytochrome c, and excessive apoptosis of myeloid progenitor cells. Blood. 2004;103:3355–3361. doi: 10.1182/blood-2003-04-1011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Cario G, et al. Heterogeneous expression pattern of pro- and anti-apoptotic factors in myeloid progenitor cells of patients with severe congenital neutropenia treated with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor. Br J Haematology. 2005;129:275–278. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2141.2005.05428.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Carlsson G, et al. Survivin expression in the bone marrow of patients with severe congenital neutropenia. Leukemia. 2009;23:622–625. doi: 10.1038/leu.2008.258. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Boztug K, et al. JAGN1 deficiency causes aberrant myeloid cell homeostasis and congenital neutropenia. Nat Genet. 2014;46:1021–1027. doi: 10.1038/ng.3069. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Hayee B, et al. G6PC3 mutations are associated with a major defect of glycosylation: a novel mechanism for neutrophil dysfunction. Glycobiology. 2011;21:914–924. doi: 10.1093/glycob/cwr023. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Bonilla MA, et al. Long-term safety of treatment with recombinant human granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (r-metHuG-CSF) in patients with severe congenital neutropenias. Br J Haematol. 1994;88:723–730. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2141.1994.tb05110.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Radomska HS, et al. CCAAT/enhancer binding protein alpha is a regulatory switch sufficient for induction of granulocytic development from bipotential myeloid progenitors. Mol Cell Biol. 1998;18:4301–4314. doi: 10.1128/mcb.18.7.4301. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Rosenbauer F, Tenen DG. Transcription factors in myeloid development: balancing differentiation with transformation. Nat Rev Immunol. 2007;7:105–117. doi: 10.1038/nri2024. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Skokowa J, et al. LEF-1 is crucial for neutrophil granulocytopoiesis and its expression is severely reduced in congenital neutropenia. Nat Med. 2006;12:1191–1197. doi: 10.1038/nm1474. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Skokowa J, Welte K. Dysregulation of myeloid-specific transcription factors in congenital neutropenia. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2009;1176:94–100. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.2009.04963.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Buitenhuis M, et al. Differential regulation of granulopoiesis by the basic helix-loop-helix transcriptional inhibitors Id1 and Id2. Blood. 2005;105:4272–4281. doi: 10.1182/blood-2004-12-4883. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Mempel K, Pietsch T, Menzel T, Zeidler C, Welte K. Increased serum levels of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor in patients with severe congenital neutropenia. Blood. 1991;77:1919–1922. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Kyas U, Pietsch T, Welte K. Expression of receptors for granulocyte colony-stimulating factor on neutrophils from patients with severe congenital neutropenia and cyclic neutropenia. Blood. 1992;79:1144–1147. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Rauprich P, Kasper B, Tidow N, Welte K. The protein tyrosine kinase JAK2 is activated in neutrophils from patients with severe congenital neutropenia. Blood. 1995;86:4500–4505. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70.Gupta K, et al. Bortezomib inhibits STAT5-dependent degradation of LEF-1, inducing granulocytic differentiation in congenital neutropenia CD34(+) cells. Blood. 2014;123:2550–2561. doi: 10.1182/blood-2012-09-456889. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71.Futami M, et al. G-CSF receptor activation of the Src kinase Lyn is mediated by Gab2 recruitment of the Shp2 phosphatase. Blood. 2011;118:1077–1086. doi: 10.1182/blood-2009-12-261636. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72.Zhu QS, Robinson LJ, Roginskaya V, Corey SJ. G-CSF-induced tyrosine phosphorylation of Gab2 is Lyn kinase dependent and associated with enhanced Akt and differentiative, not proliferative, responses. Blood. 2004;103:3305–3312. doi: 10.1182/blood-2003-06-1861. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73.Tidow N, Kasper B, Welte K. SH2-containing protein tyrosine phosphatases SHP-1 and SHP-2 are dramatically increased at the protein level in neutrophils from patients with severe congenital neutropenia (Kostmann's syndrome) Exp Hematol. 1999;27:1038–1045. doi: 10.1016/s0301-472x(99)00036-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74.Hirai H, et al. C/EBPbeta is required for ‘emergency’ granulopoiesis. Nat Immunol. 2006;7:732–739. doi: 10.1038/ni1354. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75.Skokowa J, et al. NAMPT is essential for the G-CSF-induced myeloid differentiation via a NAD(+)-sirtuin-1-dependent pathway. Nat Med. 2009;15:151–158. doi: 10.1038/nm.1913. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 76.Freedman MH. Safety of long-term administration of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor for severe chronic neutropenia. Curr Opin Hematol. 1997;4:217–224. doi: 10.1097/00062752-199704030-00011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 77.Welte K, Dale D. Pathophysiology and treatment of severe chronic neutropenia. Ann Hematol. 1996;72:158–165. doi: 10.1007/s002770050156. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 78.Germeshausen M, Ballmaier M, Welte K. Incidence of CSF3R mutations in severe congenital neutropenia and relevance for leukemogenesis: Results of a long-term survey. Blood. 2007;109:93–99. doi: 10.1182/blood-2006-02-004275. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 79.Ancliff PJ, Gale RE, Liesner R, Hann I, Linch DC. Long-term follow-up of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor receptor mutations in patients with severe congenital neutropenia: implications for leukaemogenesis and therapy. Br J Haematol. 2003;120:685–690. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2141.2003.04160.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 80.Carlsson G, et al. Neutrophil elastase and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor receptor mutation analyses and leukemia evolution in severe congenital neutropenia patients belonging to the original Kostmann family in northern Sweden. Haematologica. 2006;91:589–595. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 81.Germeshausen M, et al. Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor receptor mutations in a patient with acute lymphoblastic leukemia secondary to severe congenital neutropenia. Blood. 2001;97:829–830. doi: 10.1182/blood.v97.3.829. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 82.Germeshausen M, et al. An acquired G-CSF receptor mutation results in increased proliferation of CMML cells from a patient with severe congenital neutropenia. Leukemia. 2005;19:611–617. doi: 10.1038/sj.leu.2403663. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 83.Klimiankou M, et al. Two cases of cyclic neutropenia with acquired CSF3R mutations, with 1 developing AML. Blood. 2016;127:2638–2641. doi: 10.1182/blood-2015-12-685784. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 84.Dong F, et al. Distinct cytoplasmic regions of the human granulocyte colony-stimulating factor receptor involved in induction of proliferation and maturation. Mol Cell Biol. 1993;13:7774–7781. doi: 10.1128/mcb.13.12.7774. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 85.Fukunaga R, Ishizaka-Ikeda E, Nagata S. Growth and differentiation signals mediated by different regions in the cytoplasmic domain of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor receptor. Cell. 1993;74:1079–1087. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(93)90729-a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 86.Ziegler SF, et al. Distinct regions of the human granulocyte-colony-stimulating factor receptor cytoplasmic domain are required for proliferation and gene induction. Mol Cell Biol. 1993;13:2384–2390. doi: 10.1128/mcb.13.4.2384. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 87.Palande K, Meenhuis A, Jevdjovic T, Touw IP. Scratching the surface: signaling and routing dynamics of the CSF3 receptor. Front Biosci (Landmark Ed) 2013;18:91–105. doi: 10.2741/4089. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 88.Touw IP, van de Geijn GJ. Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor and its receptor in normal myeloid cell development, leukemia and related blood cell disorders. Front Biosci. 2007;12:800–815. doi: 10.2741/2103. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 89.Dong F, et al. Mutations in the gene for the granulocyte colony-stimulating–factor feceptor in patients with acute myeloid leukemia preceded by severe congenital neutropenia. N Engl J Med. 1995;333:487–493. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199508243330804. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 90.Hermans MH, et al. Sustained receptor activation and hyperproliferation in response to granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) in mice with a severe congenital neutropenia/acute myeloid leukemia-derived mutation in the G-CSF receptor gene. J Exp Med. 1999;189:683–692. doi: 10.1084/jem.189.4.683. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 91.Zhu QS, et al. G-CSF induced reactive oxygen species involves Lyn-PI3-kinase-Akt and contributes to myeloid cell growth. Blood. 2006;107:1847–1856. doi: 10.1182/blood-2005-04-1612. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 92.Liu F, et al. Csf3r mutations in mice confer a strong clonal HSC advantage via activation of Stat5. J Clin Invest. 2008;118:946–955. doi: 10.1172/JCI32704. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 93.Dong F, et al. Mutations in the granulocyte colony-stimulating factor receptor gene in patients with severe congenital neutropenia. Leukemia. 1997;11:120–125. doi: 10.1038/sj.leu.2400537. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 94.Germeshausen M, Skokowa J, Ballmaier M, Zeidler C, Welte K. G-CSF receptor mutations in patients with congenital neutropenia. Curr Opin Hematol. 2008;15:332–337. doi: 10.1097/MOH.0b013e328303b9f6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 95.Tidow N, et al. Clinical relevance of point mutations in the cytoplasmic domain of the granulocyte colony-stimulating factor receptor gene in patients with severe congenital neutropenia. Blood. 1997;89:2369–2375. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 96.Beekman R, et al. Sequential gain of mutations in severe congenital neutropenia progressing to acute myeloid leukemia. Blood. 2012;119:5071–5077. doi: 10.1182/blood-2012-01-406116. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 97.Skokowa J, et al. Cooperativity of RUNX1 and CSF3R mutations in severe congenital neutropenia: a unique pathway in myeloid leukemogenesis. Blood. 2014;123:2229–2237. doi: 10.1182/blood-2013-11-538025. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 98.Klimiankou M, Mellor-Heineke S, Zeidler C, Welte K, Skokowa J. Role of CSF3R mutations in the pathomechanism of congenital neutropenia and secondary acute myeloid leukemia. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2016;1370:119–125. doi: 10.1111/nyas.13097. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 99.Tschan CA, Pilz C, Zeidler C, Welte K, Germeshausen M. Time course of increasing numbers of mutations in the granulocyte colony-stimulating factor receptor gene in a patient with congenital neutropenia who developed leukemia. Blood. 2001;97:1882–1884. doi: 10.1182/blood.v97.6.1882. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 100.Zeidler C, Boxer L, Dale DC, et al. Management of Kostmann syndrome in the G-CSF era. Br J Haematol. 2000;109:490–5. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2141.2000.02064.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 101.Bux JB, G, Jaeger G, Welte K. Diagnosis and clinical course of autoimmune neutropenia in infancy: analysis of 240 cases. Blood. 1998;91:6. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 102.Farruggia P, et al. Autoimmune neutropenia of infancy: Data from the Italian neutropenia registry. Am J Hematol. 2015;90 doi: 10.1002/ajh.24187. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 103.Myers KC, et al. Variable Clinical Presentation of Shwachman-Diamond Syndrome: Update From the North-American Shwachman-Diamond Syndrome Registry. J Pediatr. 2014;164:866–870. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2013.11.039. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 104.Ghemlas I, et al. Improving diagnostic precision, care and syndrome definitions using comprehensive next-generation sequencing for the inherited bone marrow failure syndromes. J Med Genet. 2015;52 doi: 10.1136/jmedgenet-2015-103270. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 105.Ancliff PJ, et al. Two novel activating mutations in the Wiskott-Aldrich syndrome protein result in congenital neutropenia. Blood. 2006;108:2182–2189. doi: 10.1182/blood-2006-01-010249. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 106.Gauthier-Vasserot A, et al. Application of whole-exome sequencing to unravel the molecular basis of undiagnosed syndromic congenital neutropenia with intellectual disability. Am J Med Genet A. 2017;173:62–71. doi: 10.1002/ajmg.a.37969. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 107.Boxer LA, et al. Is there a role for anti-neutrophil antibody testing in predicting spontaneous resolution of neutropenia in young children. Blood. 2015;126:2211. [Google Scholar]
- 108.Lee WI, et al. Identifying patients with neutrophil elastase (ELANE) mutations from patients with a presumptive diagnosis of autoimmune neutropenia. Immunobiology. 2013;218:828–33. doi: 10.1016/j.imbio.2012.09.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 109.Zeidler C, Germeshausen M, Klein C, Welte K. Clinical implications of ELA2-, HAX1-, and G-CSF-receptor (CSF3R) mutations in severe congenital neutropenia. Br J Haematol. 2008;144:459–67. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2141.2008.07425.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 110.www.depts.washington.edu/registry
- 111.www.SCNIR.org
- 112.Elsner J, Roesler J, Emmendorffer A, Lohmann-Matthes ML, Welte K. Abnormal regulation in the signal transduction in neutrophils from patients with severe congenital neutropenia: relation of impaired mobilization of cytosolic free calcium to altered chemotaxis, superoxide anion generation and F-actin content. Exp Hematol. 1993;21:38–46. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 113.Koch C, et al. GM-CSF treatment is not effective in congenital neutropenia patients due to its inability to activate NAMPT signaling. Ann Hematol. 2017;96:345–353. doi: 10.1007/s00277-016-2894-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 114.Donini M, et al. G-CSF treatment of severe congenital neutropenia reverses neutropenia but does not correct the underlying functional deficiency of the neutrophil in defending against microorganisms. Blood. 2007;109:4716–4723. doi: 10.1182/blood-2006-09-045427. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 115.Karlsson J, et al. Low plasma levels of the protein pro-LL-37 as an early indication of severe disease in patients with chronic neutropenia. Br J Haematol. 2007;137:166–169. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2141.2007.06530.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 116.Pütsep K, Carlsson G, Boman HG, Andersson M. Deficiency of antibacterial peptides in patients with morbus Kostmann: an observation study. Lancet. 2002;360:1144–1149. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(02)11201-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 117.Ye Y, et al. The antimicrobial propeptide hCAP-18 plasma levels in neutropenia of various aetiologies: a prospective study. Sci Rep. 2015;5:11685. doi: 10.1038/srep11685. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 118.Allen RC, Stevens PR, Price TH, Chatta GS, Dale DC. In vivo Effects of recombinant human granulocyte colony-stimulating factor on neutrophil oxidative functions in normal human volunteers. J Infect Dis. 1997;175:1184–1192. doi: 10.1086/595866. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 119.Yakisan E, et al. High incidence of significant bone loss in patients with severe congenital neutropenia (Kostmann's syndrome) J Pediatr. 1997;131:592–597. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3476(97)70068-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 120.Zeidler C, et al. Stem cell transplantation in patients with severe congenital neutropenia without evidence of leukemic transformation. Blood. 2000;95:1195–1198. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 121.Fioredda F, et al. Stem cell transplantation in severe congenital neutropenia: an analysis from the European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation. Blood. 2015;126:1885–1892. doi: 10.1182/blood-2015-02-628859. quiz 1970. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 122.Oshima K, et al. Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in patients with severe congenital neutropenia: an analysis of 18 Japanese cases. Pediatr Transplant. 2010;14:657–663. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-3046.2010.01319.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 123.Ferry C, et al. Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in severe congenital neutropenia: experience of the French SCN register. Bone Marrow Transplant. 2005;35:45–50. doi: 10.1038/sj.bmt.1704718. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 124.Zeidler C, Nickel A, Sykora KW, Welte K. Improved outcome of stem cell transplantation for severe chronic neutropenia with or without secondary leukemia: a long-term analysis of European data for more than 25 years by the SCNIR. Blood. 2013;122:3347. [Google Scholar]
- 125.Zeidler C, et al. Outcome and management of pregnancies in severe chronic neutropenia patients by the European Branch of the Severe Chronic Neutropenia International Registry. Haematologica. 2014;99:1395–1402. doi: 10.3324/haematol.2013.099101. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 126.Boxer LA, et al. Use of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor during pregnancy in women with chronic neutropenia. Obstet Gynecol. 2015;125:197–203. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000000602. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 127.Jones E, Bolyard AA, Dale DC. Quality of life in patients receiving granulocyte colony stimulating factor for treatment of severe chronic neutropenia. JAMA. 1993;270:1132–1133. doi: 10.1001/jama.270.9.1132. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 128.Touw IP. Game of clones: the genomic evolution of severe congenital neutropenia. Hematology Am Soc Hematol Educ Program. 2015;2015:1–7. doi: 10.1182/asheducation-2015.1.1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 129.Nayak RC, et al. Pathogenesis of ELANE-mutant severe neutropenia revealed by induced pluripotent stem cells. J Clin Invest. 2015;125:3103–3116. doi: 10.1172/JCI80924. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 130.Morishima T, et al. Genetic correction of HAX1 in induced pluripotent stem cells from a patient with severe congenital neutropenia improves defective granulopoiesis. Haematologica. 2014;99:19–27. doi: 10.3324/haematol.2013.083873. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 131.Hiramoto T, et al. Wnt3a stimulates maturation of impaired neutrophils developed from severe congenital neutropenia patient-derived pluripotent stem cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013;110:3023–3028. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1217039110. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 132.Morishima T, et al. Neutrophil differentiation from human-induced pluripotent stem cells. J Cell Physiol. 2011;226:1283–1291. doi: 10.1002/jcp.22456. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 133.Lachmann N, et al. Large-scale hematopoietic differentiation of human induced pluripotent stem cells provides granulocytes or macrophages for cell replacement therapies. Stem Cell Reports. 2015;4:282–296. doi: 10.1016/j.stemcr.2015.01.005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 134.Dale DC, Welte K. Cyclic and chronic neutropenia. Cancer Treat Res. 2011;157:97–108. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4419-7073-2_6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 135.Engelhard D, et al. Cycling of peripheral blood and marrow lymphocytes in cyclic neutropenia. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1983;80:5734–5738. doi: 10.1073/pnas.80.18.5734. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 136.Leale M. Reccurent furunculosis. JAMA. 1910;54 [Google Scholar]
- 137.Reimann HA. Periodic disease; a probable syndrome including periodic fever, benign paroxysmal peritonitis, cyclic neutropenia and intermittent arthralgia. JAMA. 1948;136:6. doi: 10.1001/jama.1948.02890210023004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 138.Palmer SE, Stephens K, Dale DC. Genetics, phenotype, and natural history of autosomal dominant cyclic hematopoiesis. Am J Med Genet. 1996;66:413–422. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1096-8628(19961230)66:4<413::AID-AJMG5>3.0.CO;2-L. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 139.Dingli D, Antal T, Traulsen A, Pacheco JM. Progenitor cell self-renewal and cyclic neutropenia. Cell Prolif. 2009;42:330–338. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2184.2009.00598.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 140.Schmitz S, Franke H, Wichmann HE, Diehl V. The effect of continuous G-CSF application in human cyclic neutropenia: a model analysis. Br J Haematol. 1995;90:41–47. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2141.1995.tb03378.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 141.Schmitz S, Franke H, Loeffler M, Wichmann HE, Diehl V. Model analysis of the contrasting effects of GM-CSF and G-CSF treatment on peripheral blood neutrophils observed in three patients with childhood-onset cyclic neutropenia. Br J Haematology. 1996;95:616–625. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2141.1996.d01-1948.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 142.Østby I, Winther R. Stability of a model of human granulopoiesis using continuous maturation. J Math Biol. 2004;49:501–536. doi: 10.1007/s00285-004-0274-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 143.Lei J, Mackey MC. Multistability in an age-structured model of hematopoiesis: Cyclical neutropenia. J Theor Biol. 2011;270:143–153. doi: 10.1016/j.jtbi.2010.11.024. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 144.Lei J, Mackey MC. Understanding and treating cytopenia through mathematical modeling. Adv Exp Med Biol. 2014;844:279–302. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4939-2095-2_14. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 145.Dale DC, Mackey MC. Understanding, treating and avoiding hematological disease: better medicine through mathematics? Bull Math Biol. 2015;77:739–757. doi: 10.1007/s11538-014-9995-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 146.Schultz W. Gangräneszierende prozesse und defekt des granulozytensystems. Dtsch Med Wochensch. 1922;48 [Google Scholar]
- 147.Friedemann V. Agranulocytic angina. Med Klin. 1923;19 [Google Scholar]
- 148.Prendergast D. A Case of agranulocytic angina. Can Med Assoc J. 1927;17:446–447. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 149.Hitzig WH. Familial neutropenia with dominant hereditary factor and hypergammaglobulinemia. Helv Med Acta. 1959;26:779–784. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 150.Person RE, et al. Mutations in proto-oncogene GFI1 cause human neutropenia and target ELA2. Nat Genet. 2003;34:308–312. doi: 10.1038/ng1170. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 151.Hernandez PA, et al. Mutations in the chemokine receptor gene CXCR4 are associated with WHIM syndrome, a combined immunodeficiency disease. Nat Genet. 2003;34:70–74. doi: 10.1038/ng1149. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 152.Makaryan V, et al. TCIRG1-associated congenital neutropenia. Hum Mutat. 2014;35:824–827. doi: 10.1002/humu.22563. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 153.Dong F, et al. Identification of a nonsense mutation in the granulocyte-colony-stimulating factor receptor in severe congenital neutropenia. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1994;91:4480–4484. doi: 10.1073/pnas.91.10.4480. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 154.Ward AC, van Aesch YM, Schelen AM, Touw IP. Defective internalization and sustained activation of truncated granulocyte colony-stimulating factor receptor found in severe congenital neutropenia/acute myeloid leukemia. Blood. 1999;93:447–458. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 155.Carlsson G, et al. Periodontal disease in patients from the original Kostmann family with severe congenital neutropenia. J Periodontol. 2006;77:744–751. doi: 10.1902/jop.2006.050191. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]




