Table 2.
Reference and Country | Age, % male | Study Design | N | Outcome Ascertainment | Biomarker Assessment | Exposure Levels | Effect size (95% CI) | Adjustment factors |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Studies of Cadmium exposures | ||||||||
Weaver et al., 2014 Mexico |
Mean age of 14.0 years, 51.2% male | Cross-sectional | 512 | eGFR using serum creatinine and cystatin C measurement | Urine Cadmium Thallium Uranium (ICPMS) |
Mean (SD) μg/L: Cadmium: 0.34 (0.37) Thallium: 0.35 (0.20) Uranium: 0.07 (0.14) |
Mean difference in creatinine eGFR per doubling of: Cadmium: 3.1 (1.4, 4.8) Thallium: 3.6 (1.8, 5.3) Uranium: 1.1 (−0.2, 2.3) |
Age, sex, BMI, maternal education, income, smoking, systolic BP, blood lead, urine creatinine |
Swaddiwudhipong et al., 2015 Thailand |
Mean age of 9.3 years, 48.3% male | Cross-sectional | 594 | Urine β2MG levels and total protein levels | Urine and blood cadmium (AAS) | Geometric mean: 0.54 μg/g creatinine | OR of β2MG ≥ 200 μg/g: Middle/low tertile of urine cadmium: 2.06 (1.15, 3.68) High/low tertile of urine cadmium: 2.28 (1.28, 4.04) OR of urine protein ≥ 100 μg/g: Middle/low tertile of urine cadmium: 1.25 (0.82, 1.92) High/low tertile of urine cadmium: 1.39 (0.91–2.13) |
Age, sex, blood lead |
De Burbure et al., 2006 France, Poland, Czech Republic |
Age range 8.5–12.3 years, 49.2% male | Cross-sectional | 804 | Urine RBP, β2MG, and NAG levels | Blood and urine cadmium and mercury (AAS) | Geometric mean (SD) of blood cadmium in Unexposed males in France: 0.46 (1.40) μg/L Exposed males in France: 0.52 (1.40) μg/L Unexposed females in France: 0.47 (1.38) μg/L Exposed females in France: 0.5 (1.25) μg/L Unexposed males in Poland: 0.07 (1.85) μg/L Exposed males in Poland: 0.19 (2.36) μg/L Unexposed females in Poland: 0.08 (2.25) μg/L Exposed females in Poland: 0.19 (2.58) μg/L Unexposed males in Czech Republic 0.20 (1.47) μg/L Exposed males in Czech Republic: 0.29 (1.73) μg/L Unexposed females in Czech Republic: 0.20 (1.43) μg/L Exposed females in Czech Republic: 0.24 (1.62) μg/L Geometric mean (SD) of urine mercury in of Unexposed males in France: 0.99 (4.93) μg/g Exposed males in France: 0.92 (6.60) μg/g Unexposed females in France: 0.89 (5.20) μg/g Exposed females in France: 1.19 (5.78) μg/g Unexposed males in Poland: 0.06 (1.51) μg/g Exposed males in Poland: 0.06 (1.61) μg/g Unexposed females in Poland: 0.05 (1.59) μg/g Exposed females in Poland: 0.06 (1.53) μg/g Unexposed males in Czech Republic 0.26 (2.81) μg/g Exposed males in Czech Republic: 0.13 (3.59) μg/g Unexposed females in Czech Republic 0.32 (3.14) μg/g Exposed females in Czech Republic: 0.18 (2.50) μg/g |
Mean difference (p-value) in urine RBP per unit increase in blood Cd: 0.06 (< 0.001) Mean difference in urine NAG per increase in blood Cd: 0.053 (0.004) Mean difference (p-value) in urine RBP per unit increase in urine Cd: 0.097 (< 0.001) Mean difference in urine NAG per increase in urine Cd: 0.017 (< 0.03) Mean difference (p-value) in serum B2MG per unit increase in urine Hg: −0.023 (0.02) Mean difference in urine NAG per increase in urine Hg: 0.215 (0.03) |
Models for cadmium: Urine creatinine, blood lead x urine mercury, urine mercury x blood cadmium, urine mercury Models for mercury: Urine creatinine, blood lead x urine mercury, urine mercury x blood cadmium, blood cadmium |
Chan et al., 2012 China (Hong Kong)a |
Age range 1–21 years, 48.5% male | Cross-sectional | 2209 | Urine albumin levels | Blood and urine lead and cadmium (ICPMS) | Range of urine cadmium: < 0.30–29.26 nmol/L Range of blood cadmium: Smokers: < 0.27–39.27 nmol/L Non-smokers: < 0.27–36.94 nmol/L |
Correlation coefficient between urine albumin and blood cadmium: −0.014 Correlation coefficient between urine albumin and urine cadmium: 0.119 |
None |
Hossny et al., 2001 Egypt |
Age range: 0–18 years 49.3% male |
Cross-sectional | 405 | Urine A1M | Blood cadmium (AAS) | Geometric mean (SD) of blood cadmium in Neonates: 0.92 (1.9) μg/L Infants: 1.33 (1.5) μg/L Preschool: 1.11 (1.6) μg/L Primary school: 1.34 (1.6) μg/L Adolescents: 1.24 (1.5) μg/L |
In primary school aged children and adolescents, those who were A1M positive had higher blood Cd than those without A1M (p > 0.05 in school aged children and p < 0.01 in adolescents) | Age |
Fels et al., 1998 Polandb |
Mean age of 9.9 years in unexposed, 10.6 years in exposed, 64.2% male | Cross-sectional | 112 | Urine total protein, albumin, NAG, RBP, and β2MG levels | Blood and urine lead and cadmium (AAS) | Mean (SD) of blood cadmium in unexposed: 0.55 (0.18) μg/L Mean (SD) of blood cadmium in exposed: 0.69 (0.23) μg/L Mean (SD) of urine cadmium in unexposed: 0.40 (0.24) μg/L Mean (SD) of urine cadmium in exposed: 0.49 (0.35) μg/L |
Median (Range) of urine NAG in unexposed: 2.1 (0.9, 4.8) U/g Median (Range) of urine NAG in exposed: 1.9 (0.6, 8.1) U/g Median (Range) of urine β2MG in unexposed: 37 (4, 764) μg/g Median (Range) of urine β2MG in exposed: 89 (5, 1145) μg/g Median (Range) of urine RBP in unexposed: 42 (11, 207) μg/g Median (Range) of urine RBP in exposed: 46 (7, 183) μg/g Median (Range) of urine total protein in unexposed: 34 (0, 127) mg/g Median (Range) of urine total protein in exposed: 34 (0, 212) mg/g Median (Range) of urine albumin in unexposed: 6 (0.1, 35) mg/g Median (Range) of urine albumin in exposed: 7 (0.3, 47) mg/g |
None |
Noonan et al., 2002c United States |
Age range of 6–17 years, 55.3% male | Cross-sectional | 159 | NAG, AAP, albumin, and β2MG levels | Urine cadmium (AAS) | Geometric mean (95% confidence interval) of urine cadmium in females: 0.08 (0.07, 0.10) μg/g creatinine Geometric mean (95% confidence interval) of urine cadmium in females: 0.07 (0.06, 0.08) μg/g creatinine |
Spearman correlation coefficients (95% confidence interval) between urine cadmium and NAG (U/L): 0.09 (−0.07, 0.24) Spearman correlation coefficients (95% confidence intervals) between urine cadmium and albumin (mg/L): 0.03 (−0.12, 0.19) Spearman correlation coefficients (95% confidence intervals) between urine cadmium and AAP (U/L): 0.15 (0.00, 0.30, 0.19) Spearman correlation coefficients (95% confidence intervals) between urine cadmium and β2MG(mg/L) −0.01 (−0.20, 0.19) |
Urine creatinine, age, sex |
Studies of Mercury exposures | ||||||||
DeRouen et al., 2006 Woods et al., 2008 Geier et al., 2013 Portugal |
Age range 8–12 years at baseline, 54% male Mean (SD) age 10.09 (1.0) and 58% male |
Randomized trial (amalgam vs composite) | 507 Geier: 344/447d |
Urine albumin levels (Woods et al) Grier: urine GST-α and GST-π levels |
Urine Mercury (AAS) Geier et al. score derived from number of amalgams, BMI, age, gender |
Mean urine mercury of 1.8 μg/g at baseline, 3.2 μg/g after 2 years Mercury levels significantly higher in amalgam group Geier et al. mean (SD) urine mercury of 8.51 (9.5) |
No significant difference in creatinine adjusted urine albumin by treatment year (DeRouen et al., 2006) Mean difference in urine albumin per log-increase in mercury: 1.29 (1.15, 1.45) (Woods et a 2008) Grier: Mean difference (SE) in urine GST-α per increase in restorations: 0.0047 (0.002) Mean difference (SE) in urine GST-π per increase in restorations: 0.0042 (0.002) |
Age, gender, race, age at baseline, urine creatinine (Woods et al., 2008) Grier: urine mercury, porphyrin measures, gender, race, blood lead, and GST-α and GST-π levels |
Bellinger et al., 2006 Barregard et al., 2008 United States |
Mean (SD) age of 7.9 (1.3) years and 50.9% male in amalgam group Mean (SD) age of 7.9 (1.4) years and 41.6% male in amalgam group |
Randomized trial (amalgam vs composite) | 534 | Urine albumin levels (Bellinger et al., 2006) Urine albumin, γ-GT, A1M, NAG levels (Barregard et al., 2008) |
Urine and hair mercury (AAS) | Mean (SD) hair mercury of 0.4(0.5) μg/g in amalgam group at baseline Mean (SD) hair mercury of 0.4(0.5) μg/g in composite group at baseline |
Adjusted OR (95%CI) of albuminuria comparing amalgam to composite group: 1.8 (1.1, 2.9) (Barregard et al., 2008) | Randomization stratum, age, sex, race, socioeconomic status, basiline hair mercury, baseline blood lead, lean body mass, time of urine collection, creatinine concentration, storage time |
Studies of Arsenic exposures | ||||||||
Hawkesworth et al., 2013 Skroder et al., 2015 Bangladesh |
Mother-child pairs 52.7% male Mean age mothers 26.7 y |
Cohort (children assessed at 4.5 years) Cross-sectional (Skroder et al) |
2012: 1334 2015: 1106 |
eGFR levels via Cystatin-C formulae | Urine Arsenic (Hydride generation atomic absorption) Urine Arsenic, Cadmium, Selenium (ICP-MS) |
Median (10th, 90th) maternal urine As (μg/l) 80 (24, 383) at 8 weeks of pregnancy Median (5th, 95th) of child urine arsenic: 51 (16, 364) μg/L urine cadmium: 0.22 (0.08, 0.63) μg/L urine selenium: 13(6.0–26) μg/L |
Mean difference in child’s eGFR −14.2 (−32.2, 3.7) per unit increase in maternal As; Mean difference in child’s eGFR −0.29 (−0.86, 0.28) per 100 μg/L increase in arsenic Mean difference in child’s eGFR −1.8 (−3.4, −0.071) per 0.5 μg/L increase in cadmium Mean difference in child’s eGFR 0.34 (−0.76, 1.4) per 10 μg/L increase in selenium |
Age, sex, parental wealth index, height at age 4.5, season of birth Age, sex, birth weight, season of birth, weight for age z-score, maternal BMI, parity, SES, arsenic, cadmium and selenium (depending on model) |
Studies of Manganese exposures | ||||||||
Nascimento et al., 2016 Brazil |
Mean (SD) age 8.6 (0.3) in rural and 10.4 (0.3) in urban, 50.7% male | Cross-sectional (urban vs rural) | 63 | Urine albumin and NAG levels | Blood, hair, drinking water manganese (ICPMS) | Median (min, max) Manganese in rural children: blood: 32.0 (28.0, 44.0) μg/L hair 1.5 (0.19, 11.5) μg/g drinking water: 6.0 (1.0, 16.7) μg/L Urban children: blood: 19.0 (14.0, 31.0) μg/L hair 1.5 (0.09, 0.98) μg/g drinking water 1.0 (1.0, 3.0) μg/L |
Significant difference in mean (SE) in urine albumin levels between rural and urban children 11.3 (1.5)mg/g in rural children and 7.0 (1.4) mg/g in urban children P < 0.05 Significant difference in mean (SE) of urine NAG levels between rural and urban children 5.2 (0.4) mg/g in rural children and 3.4 (0.2) mg/g in urban children P < 0.05 |
None |
RBP: retinol binding protein, eGFR: estimated glomerular filtration rate, GFR: glomerular filtration rate, β2MG: β-2-microglobulin, A1M: α-1-microglobulin, NAG: N-acetyl-β-D-glucosaminidase, AAP: alanine aminopeptidase, ASV: Anodic Stripping Voltammetry, AAS: atomic absorption spectroscopy, ICPMS: inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry
Footnote about Chan et al. (2012): study also measures lead – see Table 1 for lead results.
Footnote about Fels et al. (1998): study also measures lead – see Table 1 for lead results.
Noonan et al., results only reported for individuals aged 6–17 years.
N = 344 for GSTα, N = 447 for GSTπ.
Formula from Grubb et al., “Simple cystatin C-based prediction equations for glomerular filtration rate compared with the modification of diet in renal disease prediction equation for adults and the Schwartz and the Counahan-Barratt prediction equations for children.” Clin Chem 2005 51:1420–31.