Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Feb 21.
Published in final edited form as: Environ Res. 2017 Jul 17;158:625–648. doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2017.06.029

Table 8.

Quality criteria for the evaluation of design and data analysis in epidemiologic studies of proximity to contaminated areas and kidney function biomarkers.

All Studies Prospective Case control, cross-sectional, ecological



Study Exposure
assessed at
individual
level
Exposure
assessed
using
biomarker
Standardized
biomarkers used
Internal
comparisons
presented
Response
rate ≥ 70%
from source
population
Same exclusion
criteria applied
to all
participants
Control for
relevant
confounders
Data collected in
similar manner
between
exposed and
unexposed
Loss to follow-up
independent of
exposure
Interviewer
blinded with
respect to case or
exposure status
Noncases would
have been cases
had they
developed
disease (CC only)
Cases and
controls/exposed
interviewed over
same time period
D’Andrea et al., 2015 No No Yes Yes NR NR No Yes - - - NR
Lagutina et al., 1979 No No Yes Yes NR NR No NR - - - NR
Ignatova et al., 1996 No No No Yes NR NR No NR - NR Yes NR
Rakhmanin et al., 2004 NR No Yes Yes NR NR No NR - - - NR

CC: case-control study, NR: not reported in the text of the study.

Standardized kidney biomarkers: use of albumin/creatinine ratio, GFR, eGFR, or biomarkers of kidney damage such as β2MG, NAG, AAP, A2M, or RBP.

RBP: retinol binding protein, eGFR: estimated glomerular filtration rate, GFR: glomerular filtration rate, β2MG: β-2-microglobulin, A2M: α-2-microglobulin, NAG: N-acetyl-β-D-glucosaminidase,