Skip to main content
. 2018 Jan 13;55(3):1074–1082. doi: 10.1007/s13197-017-3022-9

Table 3.

Fatty acids profile (% of total area) of dehydrated pomegranate pomace (PomP) as affected by the drying method

Parametera ANOVA CD VMD CPD–VMFD
50 °C 60 °C 70 °C 240 W 360 W 480 W 60 °C–360 W
C16:0 NS 4.3b 4.4 4.4 4.4 4.3 4.3 4.2
C18:3 (punicic) NS 66.6 65.7 67.0 65.9 66.1 66.1 67.5
CLNAc 1 (C18:3) NS 6.6 6.7 6.6 7.0 7.1 6.8 6.7
CLNA 2 (C18:3) NS 4.5 4.9 4.7 4.9 5.1 5.3 4.7
C18:2 NS 8.2 8.1 8.1 7.7 7.9 7.9 7.6
C18:1 NS 7.2 7.6 6.4 7.4 6.9 7.1 6.6
C18:0 NS 2.7 2.8 2.8 2.8 2.7 2.57 2.6
SFAc NS 7.0 7.2 7.2 7.1 7.0 6.9 6.8
MUFAc NS 7.2 7.6 6.4 7.4 6.9 7.1 6.6
PUFAc NS 85.8 85.3 86.4 85.5 86.1 86.0 86.6

NS, not significant at p < 0.05

aThe results are expressed in % in the total fatty acid profile

bValues are the mean of 3 replicates

cCLNA, conjugated linolenic acid; SFA, saturated fatty acids (C16:0, C18:0, and C20:0); MUFA, monounsaturated fatty acids (C16:1, C18:1, and C20:1); PUFA, polyunsaturated fatty acids (C18:2, and C18:3)