Skip to main content
. 2018 Feb 21;9:743. doi: 10.1038/s41467-018-03207-x

Table 1.

Photovoltaic parameters of the PSCs based on PTQ10: IDIC

Devices Voc (V) Jsc (mA cm−2) FF (%) PCE (%)
As-casta 0.995 (0.995 ± 0.003)d 16.07 (15.70 ± 0.16) 65.10 (64.89 ± 0.45) 10.41 (10.14 ± 0.14)
TAa 0.972 (0.962 ± 0.004) 16.61 (16.61 ± 0.22) 72.13 (71.55 ± 0.71) 11.65 (11.43 ± 0.10)
TA + SAa 0.969 (0.962 ± 0.005) 17.81 (17.44 ± 0.30) 73.60 (73.26 ± 0.63) 12.70 (12.29 ± 0.18)
TA + SAb 0.960 (0.960 ± 0.003) 19.65 (19.69 ± 0.27) 64.29 (63.55 ± 1.30) 12.13 (12.01 ± 0.10)
TA + SAc 0.96 20.12 62.1 12.0

aTraditional structured PSCs with donor:acceptor weight ratio of 1:1

bInverted structured PSCs with a device structure of ITO /ZnO /PTQ10: IDIC /MoO3 /Ag and with donor:acceptor weight ratio of 1:1.5

cConfirmed photovoltaic performance of the inverted PSCs by NIM

dData in parentheses are average values calculated from more than 20 devices