Skip to main content
. 2018 Feb 21;9:731. doi: 10.1038/s41467-018-03087-1

Fig. 6.

Fig. 6

Mesoaccumbens but not mesocortical activation attenuates the effect of punishment on responding for sucrose. a Task design. b After saline treatment, foot shock punishment robustly diminished responding (Sidak’s multiple comparisons test, ‘0.3 mA saline’ versus ‘no punishment saline’, all p < 0.001). This effect was abolished by activation of the mesoaccumbens, but not the mesocortical, pathway (Sidak’s test, ‘0.3 mA CNO’ versus ‘no punishment saline’ in the mesoaccumbens group, p = 0.9995; in mesocortical group, p = 0.0002; in control group, p < 0.0001); n = 9 control, n = 9 mesoaccumbens group, n = 10 mesocortical group. c Foot shock punishment evoked a decrease in DA neuron activity, measured using fiber photometry in TH::Cre rats (one-sample t-test, p = 0.0074, n = 9 rats). d No modulation of nociception by mesoaccumbens or mesocortical activation in the tail withdrawal test (2-way repeated measures ANOVA; main effect of CNO, p = 0.75; group×CNO interaction, p = 0.99); n = 8 control, n = 9 mesoaccumbens group, n = 9 mesocortical group. Data are shown as mean ± standard error of the mean; ns not significant, ****p < 0.0001, ***p < 0.001