Skip to main content
editorial
. 2018 Feb 15;197(4):423–426. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201711-2306ED

Table 1.

A Summary of Clinical Study Data Demonstrating the Adverse Functional Consequences of Resting Pulmonary Artery Pressure Levels below the Current Diagnostic Threshold for Pulmonary Hypertension

Study (Reference) Patients (N) Clinical Phenotype PA Pressure (mm Hg) Diagnostic Modality Outcome Measure  
Weitzenblum et al., 1981 (12) 175 COPD mPAP: ≤20 vs. >20 RHC ↑Unadj. mortality  
7-yr survival, 56% vs. 29%; P < 0.01  
Gladwin et al., 2004 (5) 195 SCD TR jet velocity: <2.5 vs. ≥2.5 m/s ECHO ↑Adj. mortality  
RR, 10.1 (2.2–47.0)  
P < 0.001  
Hamada et al., 2007 (6) 68 IPF mPAP: <17 vs. >17 RHC ↑Unadj. mortality  
Relative risk, 2.20 (1.40–3.45); P < 0.001  
Lam et al., 2009 (13) 2,042 Random sample, Olmsted County PASP: 15–23 vs. 24–25; 26–29; 30–32 ECHO ↑Adj. mortality  
HR, 1.46/10 mm Hg ↑PASP; P = 0.017  
Kovacs et al, 2009 (10) 29 Scleroderma-PAH/-lung disease mPAP: <17 vs. >17 RHC ↓pVo2  
↓6-MWD  
Mutlak et al., 2012 (14) 1,054 Post-MI PASP: ≤35 vs. >35 ECHO ↑Heart failure admission  
HR, 3.10 (1.87–5.14); P < 0.0001  
Heresi et al., 2013 (15) 1,491 Referral population at risk for PH mPAP: 10–20 vs. 21–24 RHC ↑Mortality  
Kimura et al., 2013 (16) 101 IPF mPAP: ≤20 vs. >20 RHC ↑Adj. mortality  
HR, 1.064 (1.015–1.116); P = 0.010  
Valerio et al., 2013 (17) 228 Scleroderma mPAP: ≤20 vs. 21–24 RHC ↑Progression to resting PH  
Damy et al., 2016 (18) 1,780 SCD or β-thalassemia TR jet velocity: <2.5 vs. ≥2.5 m/s ECHO ↑Mortality  
Kovacs et al., 2016 (19) 141 Referral population at risk for PH mPAP: <21 vs. 21–24 RHC, iCPET ↑PVR  
↑mPAP/CO  
↑TPG/CO  
↓pVo2  
↓6-MWD  
Lau et al., 2016 (20) 290 Referral population with unexplained dyspnea or PH risk mPAP: <21 vs. 21–24 RHC, iCPET ↓Exercise workload  
↓6-MWD  
↑PVR at peak exercise  
↑mPAP at peak exercise  
Maron et al., 2016 (7) 21,727 Referral population Veterans Affairs mPAP: ≤18 vs. 19–24 RHC ↑Adj. mortality  
HR, 1.23 (1.12–1.36); P < 0.0001  
↓Adj. Event-free survival  
HR Hosp., 1.07 (1.01-1.12); P = 0.0149  
Assad et al., 2017 (8) 4,343 Referral population at risk for PH mPAP: ≤18 vs. 19–24 RHC ↑Adj. mortality  
HR, 1.31 (1.04–1.65)  
P = 0.001  
↑Progression to resting PH  
Women have ↑HR for mortality for given mPAP  
↑PVR  
↑PAWP  
↓PA capacitance  
Douschan et al., 2017 (3) 547 Referral population at risk for PH mPAP: ≤17.3 vs. 20.6–24.9 RHC ↑Adj. mortality  
HR, 2.37 (1.14–4.97); P = 0.022  
↓6-MWD  
Lamia et al., 2017 (21) 44 Borderline PH, PAH, healthy controls Matched healthy controls vs. patients with mPAP ≥20–24 on RHC ECHO ↑RV dyssynchrony  
Oliveira et al., 2017 (22) 312 Referral population at risk for PH mPAP: <13, 13–16, 17–20, 21–24 RHC, iCPET ↓pVo2  
↑mPAP at peak exercise  
↑PVR at rest and peak exercise  
↓PA capacitance at rest  
↓CI at peak exercise  

Definition of abbreviations: 6-MWD = 6-minute-walk distance; Adj. = adjusted; CI = cardiac index; CO = cardiac output; COPD = chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; ECHO = echocardiography; Hosp. = hospitalization; iCPET = invasive cardiopulmonary exercise test; HR = hazard ratio; IPF = idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis; MI = myocardial infarction; mPAP = mean pulmonary artery pressure; PA = pulmonary artery; PAH = pulmonary arterial hypertension; PASP = pulmonary artery systolic pressure; PAWP = pulmonary artery wedge pressure; PH = pulmonary hypertension; pVo2 = peak volume of oxygen consumption; PVR = pulmonary vascular resistance; RHC = right heart catheterization; RR = rate ratio; RV = right ventricle; SCD = sickle cell disease; TPG = transpulmonary gradient; TR = tricuspid regurgitation; Unadj. = unadjusted.

Outcome measure data may include RR, HR, or relative risk (95% confidence interval). Modified from Reference 11.