Skip to main content
. 2017 Oct 5;7(1):e00537. doi: 10.1002/mbo3.537

Table 1.

Comparisons of short‐chain fatty acids (SCFAs) concentrations and gains between goats without exposure to the antibiotic and goats with antibiotic treatment

SCFAs MC group (mM) LC group (mM) Mean gains (%)
NST_MC ST_MC p valuea NST_LC ST_LC p valueb NST [(MC‐LC)/LC] ST [(MC‐LC)/LC]
Acetate 135.49 + 1.14 77.41 + 2.98 .01* 89.02 + 4.97 50.06 + 0.76 .03* 52.2% 54.6%
Propinate 22.15 + 0.51 17.31 + 1.38 .04* 17.60 + 1.14 12.77 + 0.69 .02* 25.9% 35.6%
Isobutyrate 1.03 + 0.06 0.91 + 0.04 .06 0.88 + 0.02 0.80 + 0.02 .13 17.0% 13.8%
Butyrate 8.65 + 0.48 7.24 + 0.53 .24 8.02 + 0.55 5.84 + 0.68 .19 7.9% 24.0%
Isovalerate 1.05 + 0.15 0.96 + 0.02 .54 0.84 + 0.06 0.83 + 0.02 .89 25.0% 15.7%
Valerate 0.82 + 0.10 0.80 + 0.06 .85 0.76 + 0.01 0.69 + 0.02 .12 7.9% 15.9%
Total SCAFA 166.29 + 0.55 101.96 + 3.72 .01* 114.65 + 6.09 68.67 + 0.61 .03* 45.0% 48.5%
a

p value indicated the significance of paired t‐test between goats without exposure to the antibiotic receiving a MC diet during the dietary modulation experiment (NST_MC) group and goats with antibiotic treatment receiving a MC diet during the dietary modulation experiment (ST_MC) group.

b

p value indicated the significance of paired t‐test between goats without exposure to the antibiotic receiving a LC diet during the dietary modulation experiment (NST_LC) group and goats with antibiotic treatment receiving a LC diet during the dietary modulation experiment (ST_LC) group.

*indicated the p value <.05