Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Dec 15.
Published in final edited form as: Clin Cancer Res. 2017 Sep 29;23(24):7512–7520. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-17-1535

Table 1.

Clinical characteristics of patients in cohorts 1 and 2 grouped by estrogen receptor status

Cohort 1 (n = 379)
Cohort 2 (n = 209)
Variable ER+
n (%)
276 (73)
ER
n (%)
103 (27)
P ER+
n (%)
185 (88)
ER
n (%)
24 (12)
P
PR
 Positive 229 (83)   4 (4) <0.001       167 (90)   8 (33) <0.001
 Negative   47 (17) 99 (96)         18 (10) 16 (67)
HER2
 Positive   42 (15) 37 (36) <0.001         27 (15) 13 (54) <0.001
 Negative 234 (85) 66 (64)       158 (85) 11 (46)
Elston—Ellis grade
 I   34 (12)   0 (0)   0.059a         54 (10)   2 (8)   0.031a
 II 144 (53) 28 (27)       103 (56)   8 (33)
 III   95 (35) 75 (73)         26 (14) 14 (59)
 Missing cases = 3 Missing cases = 2
Nodal status
 Negative 104 (38) 49 (48)   0.134       115 (64) 14 (61)   0.958
 Positive 167 (62) 54 (52)         65 (36)   9 (39)
 Missing cases = 5 Missing cases = 6
Tumor size
 <20 mm 130 (47) 37 (36)   0.069         83 (45)   7 (29)   0.214
 ≥20 mm 144 (53) 65 (64)       102 (55) 17 (71)
 Missing cases = 3
Age
 <50   46 (37) 19 (39)   0.917         35 (19)   4 (17)   0.789
 ≥50   80 (63) 30 (61)       150 (81) 20 (83)
 Missing cases = 204
Chemotherapy
 Yes 171 (62) 98 (95) <0.001         16 (9)   3 (12)   0.849
 No 105 (38)   5 (5)       163 (91) 21 (88)
Missing cases = 6
Endocrine therapy
 Yes 261 (95)   8 (8) <0.001         62 (35)   9 (37)   0.961
 No   15 (5) 95 (92)       117 (65) 15 (63)
Missing cases = 6
Ki67
 <16 166 (60) 18 (17) <0.001       131 (71)   9 (37)   0.002
 ≥16 110 (40) 85 (83)         54 (29) 15 (63)

NOTE: Correlations were calculated using χ2 test unless otherwise specified.

a

Wilcoxon/Mann–Whitney.