Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Feb 22.
Published in final edited form as: J Magn Reson Imaging. 2011 Oct 14;35(1):204–210. doi: 10.1002/jmri.22639

Figure 5.

Figure 5

Tibial/femoral cartilage images of a healthy subject at high-resolution 0.28 mm (a) and higher resolution 0.14 mm (b). The magnified views (a1,b1) are corresponding to the dashed box regions in (a,b) respectively. The higher resolution in (b1) illustrates details inside the cartilage or on the cartilage/bone interface (arrows) more effectively than the high resolution in (a1). (3T scanner, 8-channel knee coil, AWSOS sequence, FOV = 140 mm, TE/TR = 0.6/80 msec, θ = 30°, matrix size = 512, and slice thickness = 2 mm, or TE/TR = 0.6/60 msec, θ = 18°, matrix size = 1024, and slice thickness = 3 mm.)