Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Feb 22.
Published in final edited form as: J Consult Clin Psychol. 2015 Jul 27;83(6):1021–1032. doi: 10.1037/a0039534

Table 2.

Treatment group comparisons in alcohol dependent patients

Group Outcome N Chi-Square P OR/BETA(d) CI
Not en-gaged at 2 weeks Any Drinking 161 11.41 .0007 0.40 0.23 0.68
Any Heavy Drinking 161 14.50 .0001 0.33 0.19 0.58
% Days Drinking 161 6.74 .009 −1.08 (d= −.39) −1.87 −0.29
% Days Heavy Drinking 161 8.60 .003 −1.09 (d= −.40) −1.80 −0.39
Disengaged weeks 3–8 Any Drinking 73 2.00 .16 0.54 0.23 1.27
Any Heavy Drinking 73 0.85 .36 0.67 0.29 1.54
% Days Drinking 73 1.44 .23 −0.84 (d= −.32) −2.20 0.52
% Days Heavy Drinking 73 2.54 .10 −1.03 (d= −.39 −2.26 0.21
Disengaged at weeks 2 and 8 Any Drinking 86 0.07 .79 1.12 0.48 2.60
Any Heavy Drinking 86 0.57 .45 1.43 0.58 3.54
% Days Drinking 86 0.30 .58 −0.34 (d= −.25) −1.52 0.85
% Days Heavy Drinking 86 0.00 .97 0.02 (d= −.04) −1.10 1.14

Treatment contrasts for MI-IOP vs. MI-PC coded as MI-IOP=1; MI-PC=0. Contrasts for MI-PC vs. no further outreach coded as MI-PC=1; no further outreach= 0.

Models include binary indicators of Site (VA versus nonVA), Study (P01 versus P60), and a nominal indicator for study month.

Effect sizes are indicated by Odds Ratios (OR) for the dichotomous outcomes and BETA and Cohen’s d values for continuous outcomes. CI= confidence intervals