Table 3.
Effective coverage of skilled birth attendance in a facility ready to provide BEmONC, Mayuge district, using individual- and ecological-linking methods*
| A† Individual linking method: (gold standard) | B‡ Ecological-linking method (1): (no adjustment for facility level) | A–B Absolute difference (%) | C§ Ecological-linking method (2): (adjusted for facility level) | A–C Absolute difference (%) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Effective coverage of births with a skilled attendant in a health facility ready to provide: |
% (95% CI) |
% (95% CI) |
% (95% CI) |
||
| Infrastructure |
31.09 (25.08, 37.11) |
15.61 (7.20, 24.02) |
+15.48 |
25.44 (7.71, 43.17) |
+5.65 |
| Infection prevention |
37.29 (31.46, 43.14) |
32.78 (23.34, 42.21) |
+ 4.51 |
36.56 (18.91, 54.21) |
–0.73 |
| Monitoring labour |
16.48 (11.66, 21.30) |
7.80 (1.34, 14.27) |
+8.68 |
19.24 (4.16, 34.33) |
–2.76 |
| Essential drugs |
26.42 (20.41, 32.44) |
14.05 (5.64, 22.46) |
+12.37 |
29.11 (11.38, 46.84) |
–2.69 |
| Neonatal resuscitation |
30.08 (25.17, 34.98) |
20.29 (11.24, 29.34) |
+9.79 |
34.49 (24.38, 44.60) |
–4.41 |
| Clean cord care |
39.08 (32.44, 45.72) |
26.53 (17.07, 36.00) |
+12.55 |
35.38 (21.92, 48.83) |
+3.70 |
| All components | 9.86 (3.21, 16.50) | 4.68 (21.37, 31.69) | +5.18 | 11.02 (3.85, 18.19) | –1.16 |
CI – confidence interval
*Total number of births as shown in Figure 2: N = 1177; of these, number that occurred in a health facility with a skilled attendant present (linked for effective coverage): n = 643 (55%).
†Direct individual-linking between named facility of birth or home birth (Table 1, household) and readiness status in that exact facility (Table 2, facility).
‡Applying distribution of facility or home births (Table 1, household) to facility readiness for all facilities in the district combined (Table 2, facility).
§Applying distribution of facility level of birth or home births (Table 1, household) to facility readiness by level of facility (Table 2, facility).