Skip to main content
. 2018 Feb 22;12(2):e0006232. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0006232

Table 4. Sensitivity of different diagnostic methods for the detection of intestinal schistosomiasis considering the parasite load, as defined by egg counts of two Kato-Katz slides.

Classification by Parasite Load (EPG value)
Sensitivity (%) of each diagnostic method
Diagnostic Method Heavy
(EPG > 399)
% Sensitivity
Moderate
(EPG: 100–399)
% Sensitivity
Light
(EPG: 99–50)
% Sensitivity
(EPG: 49–12)
% Sensitivity
(EPG < 12)
% Sensitivity
SPL1 K1-K2 100 (04/04) 100 (12/12) 100 (04/04) 100 (28/28) 0 (0/70)
SPL1 K1-K6 100 (04/04) 100 (12/12) 100 (04/04) 100 (28/28) 22.6 (14/62)
SPL1 K1-K12 100 (04/04) 100 (11/11) 100 (04/04) 100 (28/28) 27.4 (17/62)
SPL1 K1-K14 100 (04/04) 100 (11/11) 100 (04/04) 100 (28/28) 27.0 (17/63)
SPL1-3 K1-K2 100 (04/04) 100 (12/12) 100 (04/04) 100 (28/28) 40.0 (24/60)
Saline Gradient 100 (04/04) 100 (06/06) 33.3 (01/03) 50.0 (11/22) 33.9 (20/59)
Helmintex 100 (03/03) 100 (11/11) 75.0 (03/04) 75.0 (18/24) 84.1 (53/63)
POC-CCA 100 (04/04) 100 (10/10) 100 (04/04) 77.8 (21/27) 50.8 (34/67)

Data show the sensitivity (%) of each diagnostic method and the number of individuals detected positive for intestinal schistosomiasis versus the total number of examined individuals (in brackets), according to parasite load classification. Individuals with a light infection were arbitrarily divided into three subgroups with egg counts of 99–50 eggs per gram of feces (EPG), 49–12 EPG, and less than 12 EPG.