Table 6.
Comparison of RMS radii.
| Field | Before optimization | After optimization |
|---|---|---|
| 0.0 | 2.555 μm | 1.222 μm |
| 0.5 | 4.946 μm | 2.118 μm |
| 1.0 | 5.713 μm | 4.142 μm |
| 1.5 | 7.769 μm | 8.224 μm |
| 2.0 | 23.756 μm | 10.105 μm |
| 2.3 | 10.064 μm | 10.674 μm |
Comparison of RMS radii.
| Field | Before optimization | After optimization |
|---|---|---|
| 0.0 | 2.555 μm | 1.222 μm |
| 0.5 | 4.946 μm | 2.118 μm |
| 1.0 | 5.713 μm | 4.142 μm |
| 1.5 | 7.769 μm | 8.224 μm |
| 2.0 | 23.756 μm | 10.105 μm |
| 2.3 | 10.064 μm | 10.674 μm |