Table 3. Factor loadings of the original BMZI in sample B.
| Items | Factors | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contact | Competition/Performance | Distraction/Catharsis | Body/Appearance | Fitness/Health | Activation/Enjoyment | Aesthetics | ||||||||
| CFA | ESEM | CFA | ESEM | CFA | ESEM | CFA | ESEM | CFA | ESEM | CFA | ESEM | CFA | ESEM | |
| con1 | .87 | .90 | ||||||||||||
| con2 | .90 | .92 | ||||||||||||
| con3 | .94 | .94 | ||||||||||||
| con4 | .73 | .61 | ||||||||||||
| con5 | .73 | .62 | ||||||||||||
| comper1 | .83 | .81 | ||||||||||||
| comper2 | .89 | .88 | ||||||||||||
| comper3 | .67 | .76 | ||||||||||||
| comper4 | .49 | .35 | ||||||||||||
| discat1 | .73 | .78 | ||||||||||||
| discat2 | .73 | .76 | ||||||||||||
| discat3 | .87 | .76 | .21 | |||||||||||
| discat4 | .79 | .63 | .21 | |||||||||||
| figapp1 | .79 | .82 | ||||||||||||
| figapp2 | .92 | .92 | ||||||||||||
| figapp3 | .84 | .84 | ||||||||||||
| fit1 | .71 | .67 | ||||||||||||
| fit2 | .74 | .76 | ||||||||||||
| heal1 | .47 | .43 | ||||||||||||
| actenj1 | .23 | .73 | .52 | |||||||||||
| actenj2 | .57 | .37 | .33 | |||||||||||
| actenj3 | .84 | .93 | ||||||||||||
| aes1 | .84 | .88 | ||||||||||||
| aes2 | .80 | .72 | ||||||||||||
Loadings < .20 are not presented; CFA, Confirmatory factor analysis; ESEM; Exploratory structural equation modelings.