Table 5. Standardized factor loadings (ESEM) of the updated BMZI in sample A and B.
| Items | Factors | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contact | Competition/Performance | Distraction/Catharsis | Body/Appearance | Fitness | Health | Aesthetics | ||||||||
| Sample A | Sample B | Sample A | Sample B | Sample A | Sample B | Sample A | Sample B | Sample A | Sample B | Sample A | Sample B | Sample A | Sample B | |
| con1 | .88 | .80 | ||||||||||||
| con2 | .90 | .79 | ||||||||||||
| con3 | .91 | .75 | ||||||||||||
| con4 | .60 | .67 | .22 | |||||||||||
| con5 | .60 | .58 | .21 | .20 | .21 | |||||||||
| comper1 | .79 | .88 | ||||||||||||
| comper2 | .84 | .75 | ||||||||||||
| comper3 | .70 | .46 | .21 | |||||||||||
| discat1 | .77 | .78 | ||||||||||||
| discat2 | .70 | .60 | ||||||||||||
| discat3 | .81 | .71 | ||||||||||||
| discat4 | .69 | .75 | ||||||||||||
| figapp1 | .81 | .90 | .22 | |||||||||||
| figapp2 | .90 | .88 | ||||||||||||
| figapp3 | .80 | .68 | ||||||||||||
| fit1 | .65 | .73 | ||||||||||||
| fit2 | .70 | .62 | .23 | |||||||||||
| fit3* | .70 | .63 | .22 | .26 | ||||||||||
| heal1 | .67 | .65 | ||||||||||||
| heal2* | .65 | .72 | ||||||||||||
| heal3* | .25 | .73 | .56 | |||||||||||
| aes1 | .78 | .76 | ||||||||||||
| aes2 | .84 | .80 | ||||||||||||
Loadings < .20 are not presented; CFA, Confirmatory factor analysis; ESEM, Exploratory structural equation modelling.