Skip to main content
. 2018 Feb 22;13(2):e0193214. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0193214

Table 7. Analysis of invariance of the updated version of the BMZI across exercise levels.

Sample A: employees (n = 448) Sample B: patients (n = 853)
χ2 df CFI SRMR RMSEA (90% CI) ΔCFI ΔRMSEA χ2 df CFI SRMR RMSEA (90% CI) ΔCFI ΔRMSEA
Less active group (independent ESEM) 17.47 112 .962 .022 .068 (.046-.087) 192.32 112 .984 .013 .042 (.031-.051)
More active group (independent ESEM) 15.82 112 .990 .015 .032 (.017-.045) 179.37 112 .987 .013 .037 (.027-.047)
Configural model 294.12 224 .987 .017 .037 (.024-.049) 371.59 224 .986 .013 .040 (.032-.047)
Metric model 407.16 336 .987 .031 .035 (.018- .041) .000 .002 512.12 336 .983 .026 .035 (.029-.041) .003 .005
Scalar model 483.02 359 .977 .052 .039 (.030-.048) .010 -.002 551.61 359 .981 .031 .036 (.030-.041) .005 .004

CFA, Confirmatory factor analysis; ESEM, Exploratory structural equation modelings; CFI, Comparative Fit Index; TLI, Tucker-Lewis Index; SRMR, Standardized Root Mean Square Residual; RMSEA, Root Mean Square Error of Approximation; 90%-CI, 90-percent-confidental interval for RMSEA.