Skip to main content
. 2017 Nov 23;6(1):99–108. doi: 10.1002/mgg3.353

Table 2.

A comparison of SMA families and the general population (views on newborn screening)

Question GenPop (n = 232) UK SMA population (AwS and Families; n = 337) p‐value
Q1. Identifying SMA at birth would lead to better support for children and families (%)
Agree 215 (93) 282 (84) .001
Other 17 (7) 55 (16)
Q2. Identifying SMA at birth would extend life expectancy of SMA children (%)
Agree 118 (51) 127 (38) .001
Other 114 (49) 210 (62)
Q3. Identifying SMA at birth and not during pregnancy removes parents ability to make informed decisions about bringing SMA children into the world (%)
Agree 145 (63) 192 (57) .18
Other 87 (37) 145 (43)
Q4. Identifying SMA before symptoms emerge will prevent families and children enjoying life while they are symptom‐free (%)
Agree 60 (26) 149 (44) <.0001
Other 172 (74) 188 (56)
Q5. Identifying SMA at birth will help research by enabling more children to be enrolled into clinical trials early on (%)
Agree 209 (90) 251 (74) <.0001
Other 23 (10) 86 (26)
Q6. Identification of SMA at birth would interfere with the early bonding process (%)
Agree 30 (13) 50 (15) .52
Other 202 (87) 287 (85)
Q7. Identification of SMA at birth would make the diagnosis easier for parents to accept (%)
Agree 118 (51) 100 (30) <.0001
Other 114 (49) 237 (70)
Q8. Identifying SMA at birth would spare the difficulties associated with finding a diagnosis for a child later on (%)
Agree 185 (80) 222 (66) .0003
Other 47 (20) 115 (34)
Q9. Identifying SMA at birth is important, even if the Type cannot be determined (%)
Agree 191 (82) 225 (67) <.0001
Other 41 (18) 112 (33)
Q10. Identifying SMA at birth is important because it will enable parents to make informed decisions about future pregnancies (%)
Agree 217 (94) 272 (81) <.0001
Other 15 (6) 65 (19)
Q11. It is unethical to screen newborns for conditions that have no effective treatment (%)
Agree 15 (6) 27 (8) .48
Other 217 (94) 310 (92)
Q12. I would support a Newborn screening program for SMA (%)
Agree 196 (84) 236 (70) <.0001
Other 36 (16) 101 (30)