Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 Feb 1.
Published in final edited form as: Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2017 Nov 20;168(1):107–115. doi: 10.1007/s10549-017-4583-z

Table 2.

Multivariate analysis with hazard model for nestin in the whole series and in ER+ subgroup

Multivariate Analysis for BCSS in the whole series (n=3234) Multivariate Analysis for BCSS in the ER+ subgroup (n=2323)
Variable HR (95% CI) P-value HR (95% CI) P-value
Nestin+ vs. Nestin− 1.24 (1.00–1.54) 0.05 1.39 (1.00–1.93) 0.05
Age ≥ 60 vs. < 60, years 1.13 (0.98–1.31) 0.09 1.12 (0.95–1.33) 0.18
Tumor size >2 vs. ≤2, cm 1.59 (1.37–1.84) <0.001 1.60 (1.34–1.92) <0.001
Grade {3} vs. {1,2} 1.50 (1.28–1.77) <0.001 1.50 (1.26–1.81) <0.001
Nodal status positive vs. negative 1.90 (1.61–2.23) <0.001 1.88 (1.55–2.30) <0.001
Lymphovascular Invasion positive vs. negative 1.39 (1.18–1.63) <0.001 1.28 (1.05–1.56) 0.02
ER positive vs. negative 0.82 (0.70–0.97) 0.02 ---- ----
Her2 positive vs. negative 1.37 (1.14–1.64) 0.001 1.27 (0.97–1.65) 0.08
ki67 {≥14%} vs. {<14%} 1.42 (1.22–1.64) <0.001 1.60 (1.33–1.9) <0.001

BCSS: Breast cancer specific survival; ER: Estrogen receptor; Her2: Human epidermal growth factor receptor-2.