Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 Mar 1.
Published in final edited form as: Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2018 Jan 6;235(3):607–626. doi: 10.1007/s00213-017-4825-0

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Effects of CGS 19755 on delay discounting. (a) Mean (±SEM) raw proportion of responses for the large magnitude reinforcer as a function of delay. (b and c) Mean (±SEM) A and k parameter estimates derived from the hyperbolic discounting function and exponential discounting function, respectively. (d) Mean (±SEM) AUC values. *p < .05, relative to vehicle. These graphs were derived from data previously published (Yates et al. 2017a).